Hi,
I'm working on the index/search project recently and i found solr which is
very fascinating to me.
I followed the test successful from the tutorial page. Starting up jetty and
run adding new xml (user:~/solr/example/exampledocs$ *java -jar post.jar
*.xml*) so far so good at this stage.
Now i
They are two web applications running on a single Tomcat instance.
Thanks
Madu
-Original Message-
From: findbestopensource [mailto:findbestopensou...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 14 May 2010 4:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Deployment Question
Please explain how y
On 16.05.2010, at 21:01, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent can give you
min and max values.
Sorry my bad, I just tested StatsComponent with tdate field. And it
is not working for date typed fields. Wiki says it is for numeric
fields.
ok thx for checking. i
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent can give you
> min and max values.
Sorry my bad, I just tested StatsComponent with tdate field. And it is not
working for date typed fields. Wiki says it is for numeric fields.
Hello,
For reference, I've posted about this before (but have new information now):
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Connection-reset-errors-during-commits-optimize-td484058.html#a484058
and have seen other similar posts as well:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-on-Solr-Distributed-
> Now I also want to offer a slider to define the range to
> include in the result set. However here I do not want to do
> faceting, instead I just want to find out the min and max
> date values in the result (without any of the facet filters
> applies) so I know the start and end points for the s
You might want to look at ngrams and/or shingles. In this
case I suspect that ngrams are better suited, I don't
think shingles applies with the direction you stated, but
your problem description is so short I thought I'd mention
it.
Although your collection of words can work (think synonyms) if yo
On 5/14/10 8:08 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: It looks like SnapPuller.java doesn't allow for the possibility of the
: slave having a later index version than the master. It only checks
: whether the versions are equal.
:
: It's easy enough to add that check and prevent the index fetch when
: the
I get no match when searching for "helloworld", even though I have "hello
world" in my index. How do people usually deal with this? Write a custom
analyzer, with help from a collection of all dictionary words?
thanks for suggestions/comments.
__
Sorry for hijacking the thread, but I have an additional question
Is there a way to achieve similar performance (SUSS like) when targeting
extract request handler (/update/extract)?
I guess one way can be to extract content on the client side and then use
SUSS to send update request but then extrac
Forget what I said about the second case.
The second case is a simple sort on your field.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/sort-by-function-tp814380p821252.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can you please do some math to show the principle?
Do you want to do something like this:
finalScore = score * rank
finalScore = rank
???
If the first is the case, than it is done by default (have a look at the
wiki-example for making more recent documents more relevant).
If the second is the
12 matches
Mail list logo