Non-prefix, hierarchical autocomplete? Would SOLR-1316 work? Solritas?

Hi, I've seen some posts on using SOLR-1316 or Solritas for autocomplete. Wondered what is the best solution for my use case: 1) I would like to have an hierarchical autocomplete. For example, I have a Country dropdown list and a City textbox. A user would select a country from the dropdown

Re: Non-prefix, hierarchical autocomplete? Would SOLR-1316 work? Solritas?

Forgot to add, I would like to order the autocomplete suggestions for tags/cities based on how many times they are present in the documents. --- On Sat, 6/19/10, Andy angelf...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Andy angelf...@yahoo.com Subject: Non-prefix, hierarchical autocomplete? Would SOLR-1316

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

Hey Erik, I am currently sorting by a multiValued. It apears a feature tha't you may not know wich of the fields of the multiValued field makes the document be in that position. This is good for me, I don't care for my tests. What I need to know if there is any performance issue in all of this.

Specifiying multiple mlt.fl fields

Hi, I read the wiki and tried about a dozen variations such as: ...mlt.fl=field1mlt.fl=field2 and ...mlt.fl=field1,field2... to specify more than one MLT field and it won't take. What's the trick? Also, how to do it with SolrJ? Nothing I try works. Solr 4.0 nightly build. Any tips, very

Re: Specifiying multiple mlt.fl fields

Hi Darren, try mlt.fl=field1 field2 Best, Sascha Darren Govoni wrote: Hi, I read the wiki and tried about a dozen variations such as: ...mlt.fl=field1mlt.fl=field2 and ...mlt.fl=field1,field2... to specify more than one MLT field and it won't take. What's the trick? Also, how to do it

Re: Specifiying multiple mlt.fl fields

It works! Thanks Sascha. I swear I tried that combination. Hehe. On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 21:19 +0200, Sascha Szott wrote: Hi Darren, try mlt.fl=field1 field2 Best, Sascha Darren Govoni wrote: Hi, I read the wiki and tried about a dozen variations such as:

Use of EmbeddedSolrServer

Hi, is there a best practice for use of EmbeddedSolrServer? Knows someone a good link besides http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj # EmbeddedSolrServer Regards, Robert

Re: Tips on recursive xml-parsing in dataConfig

The case changed to not using those xml-files at all, i ended up using some other datafiles as sources, witch had everything flat, so no recursion was needed afterall. But thanks for the input! :) Best regards On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Geert-Jan Brits gbr...@gmail.com wrote: my bad, it

Re: Autocompletion with Solritas

Hi Erik, On Jun 18, 2010, at 6:58pm, Erik Hatcher wrote: Have a look at suggest.vm - the name field is used in there too. Just those two places, layout.vm and suggest.vm. That was the missing change I needed. Thanks much! -- Ken And I had already added a ## TODO in my local

Re: federated / meta search

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote: Lance, which project in Solr are you referring to? Thanks, Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search ::

Re: Indexing HTML files in SOLR

Ah! You need a SolrJ program that uses Tika to parse the files and upload the text. I think there is such a program already but do not know where it is. Lance On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:13 AM, seesiddharth seesiddha...@yahoo.com wrote: Thank you so much for the reply...The link suggested by you

Minor bug in Solritas with post-facet search

I ran into one minor problem, where if I clicked a facet, and then tried a search, I'd get a 404 error. I think the problem is with the fqs Velocity macro in VM_global_library.vm, where it's missing the #else to insert a '?' into the URL: #macro(fqs $p)#foreach($fq in

Minor bug with Solritas and price data

I noticed that my prices weren't showing up, even though I've got a price field. I think the issue is with this line from hit.vm: pb#field('name')/b $! number.currency($doc.getFieldValue('price'))/p The number.currency() function needs to get passed something that looks like a number,

Re: Minor bug in Solritas with post-facet search

Fixed. form action URLs really shouldn't have query string parameters on them anyway, nor do they appear to work if so, so I moved the fq's to hidden input fields. Adding the ? into the URLs gets tricky, and doing it in #fqs isn't the right place, as those are often tacked on after other

Re: Minor bug with Solritas and price data

That's not a bug with the example schema, as price is a single-valued field. getFirstValue will work, yes, but isn't necessary when it's single valued. If you've got multiple prices, you probably want something like: #foreach($price in $doc.getFieldValue('price'))$!