Re: solr benchmarks
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 03:06 +0100, Tri Nguyen wrote: I remember going through some page that had graphs of response times based on index size for solr. Anyone know of such pages? Sorry, no. Some small scale tests with our corpus showed that response times suffered less than proportionally to index size, with regard to the raw searches: Doubling the index size did not halve the response time. On the other hand, faceting time was proportional to the index size. As always, your mileage will vary. Internally, we have some requirements for response times and I'm trying to figure out when to shard the index. If you discover that your searches are primarily IO-bound, which is often the case, and if you're still using spinning disks, I highly recommend that you upgrade to SDD's. They are very cheap compared to RAM, you don't need to change your code or workflow and they work beautifully with Lucene/SOLR: They gave us 2-4 times speedup, compared to 2 * 15.000 RPM harddisks in RAID 1. Compared to holding the index fully in RAM (with a 14GB index) they gave us 80% on a dual core machine - more CPU cores might benefit more from the RAM solution.
Unable to build the SolrCloud branch - SOLR-1873
Hi, I am trying out SolrCloud by following the instructions on the wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud I checked out the branch from https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/cloud/ When I run ant example in the folder. The build fails with the following log messages BUILD FAILED /home/student/Solr/cloud/common-build.xml:361: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/student/Solr/cloud/common-build.xml:219: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/student/Solr/cloud/contrib/clustering/build.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/student/Solr/cloud/build.xml:129: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/student/Solr/cloud/common-build.xml:159: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details. Am I missing something over here? Also do I need to know to check out some older stable revision in this branch for building SolrCloud. Thank You. Siddharth -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Unable-to-build-the-SolrCloud-branch-SOLR-1873-tp2180635p2180635.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Unable to build the SolrCloud branch - SOLR-1873
I seemed to have figured out the problem. I think it was an issue with the JAVA_HOME being set. The build was failing while compiling the module solrj -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Unable-to-build-the-SolrCloud-branch-SOLR-1873-tp2180635p2180800.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
uuid, COMB uuid, distributed farms
Planning ahead here. Anyone have experience with UUIDs, COMB UUIDs (sequential) in large, internatiionally distributed Solr/Database project. Dennis Gearon Signature Warning It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501tag=nl.e036' EARTH has a Right To Life, otherwise we all die.
Apply a patch
Hi guys would someone please explain to me how to apply a patch to solr lets say for example SOLR-2129-version3.patch i'm Running Solr Trunk apache-solr-4.0-2011-01-02_08-06-03 on Windows environment
Re: Apply a patch
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Darx Oman darxo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys would someone please explain to me how to apply a patch to solr lets say for example SOLR-2129-version3.patch i'm Running Solr Trunk apache-solr-4.0-2011-01-02_08-06-03 on Windows environment This link, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute , in particular, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Working_With_Patches should be of help. Alternatively, a patch file is just a text file that should have instructions at the beginning on how to apply the patch. Regards, Gora
Re: Different behavior for q=goo.com vs q=@goo.com in queries?
Provide us what Analyzers/Filters are you using for Analysis of email field. - Grijesh -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2183256.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Apply a patch
Hi Gora Thanx for your quick respnse. I checked out source code svn, and applied the patch but when I build the source code I've got the following error C:\trunk\solr\common-build.xml:245: C\trunk\modules\analysis\phonetic does not exist.
Problem while creating Polish supported SOLR artifact creation
Hi,
I am new to do SOLR patching, Can anyone help me to do this?
I am trying to apply this patch [SOLR-2237.patch] to include polish
character support in SOLR.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2237
I did the following steps:
1) svn co -r {2010-11-15} http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk
lucene-dev-trunk
2) cd lucene-dev-trunk
3) wget
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12459598/SOLR-2237.patch
4) patch -p0 -i SOLR-2237.patch --dry-run
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file
solr/contrib/analysis-extras/src/test/org/apache/solr/analysis/TestStempelPolishStemFilterFactory.java
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file
solr/contrib/analysis-extras/src/java/org/apache/solr/analysis/StempelPolishStemFilterFactory.java
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file
modules/analysis/stempel/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/stempel/StempelStemmer.java
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file
modules/analysis/stempel/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/pl/PolishAnalyzer.java
I believe patch was successfully completed.
5) ant
I got the following compilation errors.
common.compile-core:
[javac] Compiling 123 source files to
/home/test/lucene-dev-trunk-Nov-2010-exported_test/lucene/build/classes/java
[javac]
/home/test/lucene-dev-trunk-Nov-2010-exported_test/lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/SortField.java:472:
inconvertible types
[javac] found :
org.apache.lucene.search.cache.CachedArrayCreatorcapture of ?
[javac] required: org.apache.lucene.search.cache.IntValuesCreator
[javac] return new FieldComparator.IntComparator(numHits,
(IntValuesCreator)creator, (Integer)missingValue );
[javac]
^
[javac]
/home/test/lucene-dev-trunk-Nov-2010-exported_test/lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/SortField.java:475:
inconvertible types
[javac] found :
org.apache.lucene.search.cache.CachedArrayCreatorcapture of ?
[javac] required: org.apache.lucene.search.cache.FloatValuesCreator
[javac] return new FieldComparator.FloatComparator(numHits,
(FloatValuesCreator)creator, (Float)missingValue );
[javac]
^
[javac]
/home/test/lucene-dev-trunk-Nov-2010-exported_test/lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/SortField.java:478:
inconvertible types
[javac] found :
org.apache.lucene.search.cache.CachedArrayCreatorcapture of ?
[javac] required: org.apache.lucene.search.cache.LongValuesCreator
[javac] return new FieldComparator.LongComparator(numHits,
(LongValuesCreator)creator, (Long)missingValue );
[javac]
^
[javac]
/home/test/lucene-dev-trunk-Nov-2010-exported_test/lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/SortField.java:481:
inconvertible types
[javac] found :
org.apache.lucene.search.cache.CachedArrayCreatorcapture of ?
[javac] required: org.apache.lucene.search.cache.DoubleValuesCreator
[javac] return new FieldComparator.DoubleComparator(numHits,
(DoubleValuesCreator)creator, (Double)missingValue );
[javac]
^
[javac]
/home/test/lucene-dev-trunk-Nov-2010-exported_test/lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/SortField.java:484:
inconvertible types
[javac] found :
org.apache.lucene.search.cache.CachedArrayCreatorcapture of ?
[javac] required: org.apache.lucene.search.cache.ByteValuesCreator
[javac] return new FieldComparator.ByteComparator(numHits,
(ByteValuesCreator)creator, (Byte)missingValue );
[javac]
^
[javac]
/home/test/lucene-dev-trunk-Nov-2010-exported_test/lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/SortField.java:487:
inconvertible types
[javac] found :
org.apache.lucene.search.cache.CachedArrayCreatorcapture of ?
[javac] required: org.apache.lucene.search.cache.ShortValuesCreator
[javac] return new FieldComparator.ShortComparator(numHits,
(ShortValuesCreator)creator, (Short)missingValue );
[javac]
^
[javac] 6 errors
Again I tried the following
5) cd solr
6) ant dist
Again I got the same above six error messages. I also tried the checkout the
latest code from lucene trunk, Still I could not able to make it up.
Can anyone provide a solution for this?
It would be really helpful if I get latest polish supported solr war file
readily available.
Thanks,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-while-creating-Polish-supported-SOLR-artifact-creation-tp2183507p2183507.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
names of index files
Dear list, some questions about the names of the index files. With an older Solr 4.x version from trunk my index looks like: _2t1.fdt _2t1.fdx _2t1.fnm _2t1.frq _2t1.nrm _2t1.prx _2t1.tii _2t1.tis segments_2 segments.gen With a most recent version from trunk it looks like: _3a9.fdt _3a9.fdx _3a9.fnm _3a9_0.frq _3a9.nrm _3a9_0.prx _3a9_0.tii _3a9_0.tis segments_4 segments.gen Why is there an _0 at some files? Is it from Lucene or from Solr or a fault in my system? Both indexes are optimized, any idea? Regards, Bernd
