Re: Multiple hashJoin or innerJoin

This is the full error message from the Node for the second example, which is the following query that get stucked. innerJoin(innerJoin( search(people, q=*:*, fl="personId,name", sort="personId asc"), search(pets, q=type:cat, fl="pertsId,petName", sort="personId asc"), on="personId=petsId"

Re: Multiple hashJoin or innerJoin

Hi Joel, Below are the results which I am getting. If I use this query; innerJoin(innerJoin( search(people, q=*:*, fl="personId,name", sort="personId asc"), search(pets, q=type:cat, fl="pertsId,petName", sort="personId asc"), on="personId=petsId" ), search(collection1, q=*:*,

Re: node not joining the rest of nodes in cloud

Never mind. I had a different config for zookeeper on second vm which brought a different cloud. On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, 8:48 PM Satya Marivada wrote: > Here is the image: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/hd97j4d3h3q0oyh/solr%20nodes.png?dl=0 > > There is a node on 002:

Re: node not joining the rest of nodes in cloud

Here is the image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/hd97j4d3h3q0oyh/solr%20nodes.png?dl=0 There is a node on 002: 15101 port missing from the cloud. On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 7:46 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Images don't come through the mailer, they're stripped. You'll have to

Re: node not joining the rest of nodes in cloud

Images don't come through the mailer, they're stripped. You'll have to put it somewhere else and provide a link. Best, Erick On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Satya Marivada wrote: > Hi, > > I am running solr-6.3.0. There are4 nodes, when I start solr, only 3 nodes >

node not joining the rest of nodes in cloud

Hi, I am running solr-6.3.0. There are4 nodes, when I start solr, only 3 nodes are joining the cloud, the fourth one is coming up separately and not joining the other 3 nodes. Please see below in the picture on admin screen how fourth node is not joining. Any suggestions. Thanks, satya [image:

Re: IndexSchema uniqueKey is not stored

Markus: I'm 95% certain that as long as the uniqueKey (effectively) has useDocValuesAsStored everything should still work and it's just the error checking/warning that's broken -- if you want to test that out and file a jira that would be helpful. the one concern i have is that a deliberate

JSON facet API: exclusive lower bound, inclusive upper bound

The docs for the JSON facet API tell us that the default ranges are inclusive of the lower bounds and exclusive of the upper bounds. �I'd like to do the opposite (exclusive lower, inclusive upper), but I can't figure out how to combine the 'include' parameters to make it work. � �

Re: Live update the zookeeper for SOLR

Solr is configured with the zookeeper ensemble as mentioned below. I will provide logs in a later time. From: Shawn Heisey > Date: Friday, Jun 16, 2017, 12:27 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

bq: But I only changed the docvalues not the multivalued It's the same issue. There is remnant metadata when you change whether a field uses docValues or not. The error message can be ambiguous depending on where the issue is encountered. Best, Erick On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Aman Deep

Re: (how) do folks use the Cloud Graph (Radial) in the Solr Admin UI?

+solr-user Might get a different audience on this list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) Date: Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:43 AM Subject: (how) do folks use the Cloud Graph (Radial) in the Solr Admin UI? To:

Re: Custom Response writer

M, You ask what is better, and that is often a matter of opinion. My guess is that you should have that name stored in the Solr doc, so it can be in the response when you have a match. Oh, and I find JSON easier to work with than XML. Cheers -- Rick On June 16, 2017 10:19:03 AM EDT, mganeshs

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

But I only changed the docvalues not the multivalued , Anyway I will try to reproduce this by deleting the entire data directory On 16-Jun-2017 9:52 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote: > bq: deleted entire index from the solr by delete by query command > > That's not what I

Re: Live update the zookeeper for SOLR

On 6/16/2017 9:05 AM, Xie, Sean wrote: > Is there a way to keep SOLR alive when zookeeper instances (3 instance > ensemble) are rolling updated one at a time? It seems SOLR cluster use > one of the zookeeper instance and when the communication is broken in > between, it won’t be able to reconnect

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

bq: deleted entire index from the solr by delete by query command That's not what I meant. Either a> create an entirely new collection starting with the modified schema or b> shut down all your Solr instances. Go into each replica/core and 'rm -rf data'. Restart Solr. That way you're absolutely

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

Yes ,it was a new schema(new collection),and after that I change only docvalues= true using schema api,but before changing the schema I have deleted entire index from the solr by delete by query command using admin gui. On 16-Jun-2017 9:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote: My

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

My guess is you changed the definition of the field from multiValued="true" to "false" at some point. Even if you re-index all docs, some of the metadata can still be present. Did yo completely blow away the data? By that I mean remove the entire data dir (i.e. the parent of the "index"

Re: Live update the zookeeper for SOLR

> It seems SOLR cluster use one of the zookeeper instance Is solr configured to point to exactly one host or to a list of the hosts in the zookeeper ensemble? The zkHost value should contain all of the zk hosts. We had a similar issue where the solr instance was only pointing to zk1 and none of

IndexSchema uniqueKey is not stored

Hi, Moving over to docValues as stored field i got this: o.a.s.s.IndexSchema uniqueKey is not stored - distributed search and MoreLikeThis will not work But distributed and MLT still work. Is the warning actually obsolete these days? Regards, Markus

Live update the zookeeper for SOLR

Is there a way to keep SOLR alive when zookeeper instances (3 instance ensemble) are rolling updated one at a time? It seems SOLR cluster use one of the zookeeper instance and when the communication is broken in between, it won’t be able to reconnect to another zookeeper instance and keep

RE: Custom Response writer

Yes, index the employee and item names instead of only their ID's. And if you can't for some reason, i'd implement a DocTransformer instead of a ResponseWriter. Regards, Markus -Original message- > From:mganeshs > Sent: Friday 16th June 2017 16:19 > To:

Custom Response writer

Hi, We have requirement like in the response we would like to add description of an item with item id(this field comes from solr response by default) or employee name along with employee id ( this is just an example use case ). In the solr document what we have is only item id or employee id.

Re: Possible bug in Solrj-6.6.0

Yes that is correct. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: > Thanks Joel, > It is working now > One quick question,as you say that we can use solr client cache multiple > time so can I create a single

Re: Possible bug in Solrj-6.6.0

Thanks Joel, It is working now One quick question,as you say that we can use solr client cache multiple time so can I create a single instance of solr client cache and use it again and again ,since we are using one single bean for client object. On 16-Jun-2017 6:28 PM, "Joel Bernstein"

Re: Possible bug in Solrj-6.6.0

The issue is that in 6.6 CloudSolrStream is expecting a StreamContext to be set. So you'll need to update your code to do this. This was part of changes made to make streaming work in non-SolrCloud environments. You also need to create a SolrClientCache which caches the SolrClients. Example:

Facet is not working while querying with group

Hi, Facets are not working when i'm querying with group command request- facet.field=isBlibliShipping=true=true=productCode=true=on=*:*=json Schema for facet field It was throwing error stating Type mismatch: isBlibliShipping was indexed with multiple values per document, use SORTED_SET instead

Possible bug in Solrj-6.6.0

Hi, I think their is a possible bug in Solrj version 6.6.0 ,as streaming is not working as i have a piece of code public Set getAllIds(String requestId, String field) { LOG.info("Now Trying to fetch all the ids from SOLR for request Id {}", requestId); Map props = new HashMap();