Hi Emir,
We are deleting a larger subset of docs with a particular value which we
know based on the id and only updating a few of the deleted. Our document
is of the form
__, we need to delete all that has the same ,
that are no longer in DB and then update only a few that has been updated
in DB.
Thank you for the explanation.
To close the loop, I was able to track the problem down to the Lucene Query
parser on 5.2.1 which returned +body:"123 234 345 456" for a query string
123456.
Turned out that It is possible to get the same behavior by turning on split
on white-space and auto
First, attachments are aggressively stripped by the mail server, none of
your images came through.
Second, try adding =query to the URL and look at the parsed query
returned, that should provide some good hints.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Rushikesh Garadade <
Arturas:
" it is becoming incredibly difficult to find working code"
Yeah, I sympathize totally. What I usually do is go into the test code
of whatever version of Solr I'm using and find examples there. _That_
code _must_ be kept up to date ;).
About batching docs. What you gain basically more
Hi Arturas,
Here are some things to try :
1) HTMLStripCharFilter stripper = new
HTMLStripCharFilter(strReader.markSupported() ? strReader : new
BufferedReader(strReader))
2) Consider using HTML Strip update processor factory.
3) Create a custom Lucene analyzer using html strip char filter
On 7/4/2018 3:32 AM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
Details:
I am benchmarking solrcloud setup on a single machine (Intel 7 with 8 "cpu
cores", an SSD as well as a HDD) using the German Wikipedia collection. I
created 4 nodes, 4 shards, rep factor: 2 cluster on the same machine (and
managed to push the
Does it need to be a SolrCloud? If it is just replication, maybe it can
just be double indexed from the client. Or old style replication. And then
use LotsOfCores autoloading.
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 8:46 AM Shawn Heisey, wrote:
> On 6/27/2018 5:10 AM, Sharif Shahrair wrote:
>
Small Correction in the mail above: attachmentType is managed-schema is:
-- Forwarded message -
From: Rushikesh Garadade
Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:43 PM
Subject: exact Match and Contains
To:
Hi,
I have field attachmentType in my collection whose schema is as follows:
Hi Erick et al,
Thanks a lot for the response. Your explanation seems very plausible and
I'd love to investigate those further.
Batching the docs (for me surprisingly) improved the numbers:
Buffer size secs MB/s Docs/s
N:500 1117 34.4077538 2400.72695
N:100 1073 35.8186962 2499.17241
N:10 1170
Hi,
I have field attachmentType in my collection whose schema is as follows:
when I search for attachmentType:application/pdf i.e. /select
*?q=attachmentType:application/pdf *
I get results
[image: image.png]
When I search for attachmentType:*application/pdf* i.e. /select?
Just set the size parameter in solrconfig.xml to 0.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Sharif Shahriar wrote:
> Hi Emir,
> Thanks a lot for your reply. In your reply you've mentioned-
> If you stick with multiple collections, you can turn off caches completely,
> monitor latency and
Just a try block or a try-with-resources block? I.e.
try (CloudSolrClient csc = new ClousSolrClient.) {
}
try-with-resources is _designed_ to call close when the
block is exited, there's no mystery involved at all.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ritesh Kumar
wrote:
> Hello
Hi,
In the solr documentation, it is mentioned that blockUnknown property for
Authentication plugin has the default value of false, which means any
authenticated users will be allowed to use Solr. However, wondering whether
this parameter only makes sense for Basic Authentication only or does it
Hi Emir,
Thanks a lot for your reply. In your reply you've mentioned-
If you stick with multiple collections, you can turn off caches completely,
monitor latency and turn on caches for collections when it is reaching some
threshold.
-How this can be done? Is there any configuration to turn off
Ah hmm I guess I didn't realize the autoscaling didn't use the rule based
stuff (haven't had opportunity to work with either). If it's deprecated,
maybe that suggests we need a highly visible warning box on the ref guide
page?
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
I am confused. Why you do not just add the CharFilter definition to the
field type you need?
You see to be trying to do it completely on the cliwnt side? No sure.
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 2:53 AM Arturas Mazeika, wrote:
> Hi Solr Folk,
>
> What would be the easiest way to use
Hi Erick,
wow.
This Email had a such a profound effect and filled so many gaps in my head.
I was wondering how master-slave (through replication) and (quorum based or
whatever the name is) distribution live under the same hood in solr. And in
such a concise manner! Good Job indeed. I wonder
Hi Solr Folk,
What would be the easiest way to use some of the Solr and Lucene components
in SolrJ?
I am pretty amazed how much thought and careful engineering went into some
individual components to cover the wild real world effectively. And I
wonder whether one could re-use some of them in
18 matches
Mail list logo
