Upgrade between minor releases does not require a re-index but please read
the upgrade notes for 7.4 and 7.5 releases in the CHANGES.txt in case there
are configuration changes you need to make.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:33 AM Dave wrote:
> Would a minor solr upgrade such as this require a
On 10/18/2018 12:35 PM, Dinesh Sundaram wrote:
Can you please share the steps to integrate nutch 2.3.1 with solrcloud
7.1.0.
You will need to speak to the nutch project about how to configure their
software to interact with Solr. If you have questions about Solr
itself, we can answer those.
Right.
An HTTP cache will save the last calculated value. You can set an retention
limit, like only cache an answer for 4 hours. If a request comes in and the
cached value is older than that limit, the cache will send the request through
to Solr, get the answer, then cache it.
wunder
Walter
Sorry for the late response Walter, but I believe the bottom line of what you
are saying below is that having the data pre calculated (either in Cache or in
database) is faster than calculating the values on the fly. However once the
data is pre calculated using Solr with HTTP Caching will
Hello,
I'm investigating an 8 nodes Solr 7.2.1 cluster because we've a lot of
problems, like when a node fails to import from a DB (maybe it freeze), the
entire cluster goes down, and other like the leader wont change even when
is down (all nodes detects that is down but no leader election is
Found it.
My SOLR does NOT store fields and after some careful checking, it turns out
we do NOT do term vectors either... So, according to the docs, MLT will
not work.
Thanks for the response David!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:44 PM John Bickerstaff
wrote:
> Thanks. There are many docs with
Thanks. There are many docs with matching words I've tried an
extremely simplified case where a basic query (q=Field1:"foo") returns
millions of results... however a MLT similar to the one I mention below,
using a doc Id I know has "foo" in Field1 returns only the same Doc ID as
submitted in
Would a minor solr upgrade such as this require a reindexing in order to take
advantage of the skg functionality, or would it work regardless? A full
reindex is quite a large operation in my use case
Have you tried with Solr 7.5? I think it may have been fixed in that version?
At least for the timeseries() expression...
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 18. okt. 2018 kl. 05:35 skrev RAUNAK AGRAWAL :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use streaming rollup
Make sure your query has an “AND NOT id:your doc id”
Also be certain there are other documents that will meet your criteria for a
test case. Remember it’s unique words in your core/collection
On Oct 18, 2018, at 2:43 PM, John Bickerstaff
mailto:j...@johnbickerstaff.com>> wrote:
All,
I am
All,
I am having trouble with a “more like this” query in Solr.
Here’s what I think should be happening:
1. Query contains Document ID (q=id:"942316176:9009:66
Hi Team,
Can you please share the steps to integrate nutch 2.3.1 with solrcloud
7.1.0.
Thanks,
Dinesh Sundaram
Hello All,
I have a requirement to group and show the total number of results.
Example :
Solr has 10 documnets with 3 docs has rank (which is a field) 1 , 3 docs
has rank 2 and 3 has rank 3.
when i do goup=ture and group.field=rank & group.limit=3 &
group.ngroups=true
I am getting the grouped
I am on look out for ideas too but I was thinking of using some NER
technique to index named entities in a specific field and then use Semantic
Knowledge Graph on that specific field i.e. limit SKG queries to that field
only. I am not sure however if this would produce desired results. I don't
Hi,
if I am using a group.query to get documents, is there a way to highlight
the documents matching group.query using the matching query itself?
If I am not mistaken currently solr will highlight documents using the main
query pass via the request q parameter?
--
Sent from:
why remove "\solr\contrib\map-reduce" lib from solr6.6.1?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
I have been trying to use Tesseract through the data-import-handler in Solr and
it actually works very well – with English. As the documents are in Danish, I
need to change the language setting in Tesseract to Danish as well, is that
possible from Solr?
I was using the
...but using Streaming Expressions it's possible to achieve the goal, AFAIK
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/stream-decorators.html#innerjoin
Though, probably it won't be so fast as search
--
Vadim
-Original Message-
From: Joel Bernstein [mailto:joels...@gmail.com]
Sent:
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
Thanks again Joel for your reply. I have noted your suggestions.
I observed one more thing while using solrj to fetch the data using /stream
with export and direct /export. The solr QTime is almost same, however
elapsed time(total time) to fetch response in streaming with export is
better
20 matches
Mail list logo