I pasted a modest blob of text into the analysis debug slot on the admin
app, and am rewarded with this, even with -Xmx1g.
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at java.util.ArrayList.ensureCapacity(ArrayList.java:169)
at java.util.ArrayList.add(ArrayList.java:351)
A helpful correspondent responded to a JIRA of mine suggesting run-jetty-run
to debug solr plugins from eclipse.
Can someone provide a bit more detail? Do you link your examples dir into
your Eclipse project? Make a separate Eclipse project that points to the
examples dir?
Got it, thanks.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
A helpful correspondent responded to a JIRA of mine suggesting
run-jetty-run
to debug solr plugins from eclipse.
Can someone provide a bit more detail? Do you link your
Suggestion,
another ant target that creates an example dir outside of the tree?
I was a little bit surprised by the following scenario:
1) svn co
2) ant example
3) edit schema.xml
4) svn st
In the future, I'll run cp -r before I start messing with the example.
I'm +1 for the work directory.
This turned out to be a side-effect of the since-fixed use of GET in
analysis.jsp, coupled with a mistake in one of my filters.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: I pasted a modest blob of text into the analysis debug slot on the admin
: app, and am
Unless you can come up with language-neutral tokenization and stemming, you
need to:
a) know the language of each document.
b) run a different analyzer depending on the language.
c) force the user to tell you the language of the query.
d) run the query through the same analyzer.
On Thu, Mar
You can store in one field if you manage to hide a language code with the
text. XML is overkill but effective for this. At one point, we'd
investigated how to allow a Lucene analyzer to see more than one field (the
language code as well as the text) but I don't think we came up with
anything.
On
or
en/Laserjet.
wunder
On 3/20/08 9:20 AM, Benson Margulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you can come up with language-neutral tokenization and stemming,
you
need to:
a) know the language of each document.
b) run a different
analyzer depending on the language.
c) force the user
and the benefit didn't justify that.
wunder
==
Walter Underwood
Former Ultraseek Architect
Current Entire Netflix Search Department
On 3/20/08 9:45 AM, Benson Margulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Token/by/token seems a bit extreme. Are you concerned with macaronic
documents?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008
Dear CXF users,
There are many versions of CXF sloshing around. We've got 2.0.6 and
2.1, and many people have picked up earlier versions.
If the early universe underwent 'inflation,' CXF could perhaps be
described as having experienced 'deflation', in the sense that we
worked on and resolved
I confess that I did only minimal googling before composing the below.
I would like to be able to insert my own code into Solr to rescore
query results. To be more specific, I'd like to send Solr a query in
which some additional information is attached to the query. After Solr
has done the usual
I'm looking at the following. I want to (1) map some query fields to
some other query fields and add some things to FL, and then (2)
rescore.
I can see how to do it as a RequestHandler that makes a parser to get
the fields, or I could see making a SearchComponent that was stuck
into the list just
i make a new index each iteration. if I insert the same docs in the
same order, should I expect the same query results? Note that I shut
down entirely after the adds, then in a new process run the queries.
On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
I appear to be
, if you cut off hits at some fixed threshold, you could see
different entries at the low-scoring end of the hit list. - Steve
THanks.
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
I've got a prototype of a RequestHandler that embeds, within itself, a
SearchHandler. Yes, I read the previous advice to be a query
component, but I found it a lot easier to chart my course.
I'm having some trouble with sorting. I came up with the following.
'args' is the usual MapString,
I've answered my own question, but it left me with a lot of curiosity.
Why is the convention to build strings joined with commas (e.g in
SolrQuery.addValueToParam) rather than to use the array option? All
these params are MapString, String[], so why cram multiples into the
first slot with commas
I've made a RequestHandler class that acts as follows:
1. At its initialization, it creates a StandardRequestHandler and hangs onto it.
2. When a query comes to it (I configure it to a custom qt value), it:
a. creates a new query based on the query that arrived
b. creates a
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I've made a RequestHandler class that acts as follows:
1. At its initialization, it creates a StandardRequestHandler and hangs onto
it.
2. When a query comes
Grant, let me see if I can expand this, as it were:
{!benson f1:v1 f2:v2 f3:v3} (or do I mean {!query defType='benson' ...}?)
I see how that could expand to be anything else I like.
However, the Function side has me a little more puzzled.
The information from the fields inside my {! ... } gets
I'm working on a prototype of a scheme that uses SolrCloud to, in
effect, distribute a computation by running it inside of a request
processor.
If there are N shards and M operations, I want each node to perform
M/N operations. That, of course, implies that I know N.
Is that fact available
Starting the leader with:
java -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/conf -Dcollection.configName=rnicloud
-DzkRun -DnumShards=3 -Djetty.port=9167 -jar start.jar
and browsing to
http://localhost:9167/solr/rnicloud/admin/zookeeper.jsp
I get:
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing
or another
framework for distributed computation, see e.g.
http://java.dzone.com/articles/comparison-gridcloud-computing
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 9. apr. 2012, at 13:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
I'm
I specify -Dcollection.configName=rnicloud, but the admin gui tells me
that I have a collection named 'collection1'.
And, as reported in a prior email, the admin UI URL in there seems wrong.
-write the query for each shard? Seems unnecessary.
For reasons described in previous email that I won't repeat here.
brbrbr--- Original Message ---
On 4/9/2012 08:45 AM Benson Margulies wrote:br Jan Høydahl,
br
brMy problem is intimately connected to Solr. it is not a batch job
If you would be so kind as to look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3342, you will see that I
tried to use a working configuration for a URP of mine with SolrCloud,
and received in return an NPE.
Somehow or another, by default, the XmlUpdateRequestHandler ends up
using (I think) the
Those of you insomniacs who have read my messages here over the last
few weeks might recall that I've been working on a request handler
that wraps the SearchHandler to rewrite queries and then reorder
results.
(I haven't quite worked out how to apply Grant's alternative
suggestions without losing
, Benson Margulies wrote:
Those of you insomniacs who have read my messages here over the last
few weeks might recall that I've been working on a request handler
that wraps the SearchHandler to rewrite queries and then reorder
results.
(I haven't quite worked out how to apply Grant's alternative
Um, maybe I've hit a quirk?
In my solrconfig.xml, my special SearchComponents are installed only
for a specific QT. So, it looks to me as if that QT is not propagated
into the request out to the shards, and so they run the ordinary
request handler without my components in it.
Is this intended
.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Um, maybe I've hit a quirk?
In my solrconfig.xml, my special SearchComponents are installed only
for a specific QT. So, it looks to me as if that QT is not propagated
into the request out to the shards
Another thought: currently I'm using qt=ME to indicate this process. I
could, in theory, use some ME=true and make my components check for it
to avoid this process, but it seems kind of peculiar from an end-user
standpoint.
I've updated the doc with my findings. Thanks for the pointer.
How are URP's managed with respect to cloud deployment? Given some
solrconfig.xml like the below, do I expect it to be in the chain on
the leader, the shards, or both?
updateRequestProcessorChain name=RNI
!-- some day, add parameters when we have some --
processor
field.
That seems to imply that 'before' processors run both on the leader
and on the shards. Where do the afters run? Just on the leader or just
on the shards?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:43:36 -0400, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
How are URP's managed with respect to cloud
After I load documents into my cloud instance, a URL like:
http://localhost:PORT/solr/query?q=*:*
finds nothing.
http://localhost:PORT/solr/query?q=*:*qt=standard
finds everything.
My custom request handlers have 'default=false'.
What have I done?
In my cloud configuration, if I push
delete
query*:*/query
/delete
followed by:
commit/
I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but the documents remain
in the index, visible to /query.
Here's what seems my relevant bit of solrconfig.xml. My URP only
implements processAdd.
forward from there or back out your configs and plugins until it
works again.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
In my cloud configuration, if I push
delete
query*:*/query
/delete
followed by:
commit/
I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but the documents
it
works again.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
In my cloud configuration, if I push
delete
query*:*/query
/delete
followed by:
commit/
I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but the documents remain
in the index, visible to /query.
Here's what
presumably you've defined in solrconfig.xml...
What does debugQuery=on show?
It turned out that I had left an extra(eous) declaration for /query
with my custom RT, and when I removed it all was well.
thanks,benson
Best
Erick
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul
to be configurable
just like the uniqueKey in the schema.
schema.xml
You must have a _version_ field defined:
field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true/
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I didn't have a _version_ field, since nothing in the schema says
I'm probably confused, but it seems to me that the case I hit does not
meet any of Yonik's criteria.
I have no replicas. I'm running SolrCloud in the simple mode where
each doc ends up in exactly one place.
I think that it's just a bug that the code refuses to do the local
deletion when there's
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
google must not have found it - i put that in a month or so ago I believe -
at least weeks. As you can see, there is still a bit to fill in, but it
covers the high level. I'd like to add example snippets for the rest
A discussion over on the dev list led me to expect that the by-if
field retrievals in a SolrCloud query would come through the get
handler. In fact, I've seen them turn up in my search component in the
search handler that is configured with my custom QT. (I have a
'prepare' method that sets
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:43 PM, John Chee johnc...@mylife.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
I need
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
: that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
You have to just execute the subquery itself ... doc collection
and score
dig.
Paul
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com a écrit :
Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
I can provide 'why on earth
, should be pretty speedy for a mere 200 items.
Maybe I'm missing some even easier way, given a DocList and a query,
to obtain scores for those docs for that query?
paul
Le 14 avr. 2012 à 15:34, Benson Margulies a écrit :
yes please
On Apr 14, 2012, at 2:40 AM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net
I've been pestering you all with a series of questions about
disassembling and partially rescoring queries. Every helpful response
(thanks) has led me to further reading, and this leads to more
questions. If I haven't before, I'll apologize now for the high level
of ignorance at which I'm
?
Yup.
_val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
(e)dismay's bf, or dismay's boost params.
Erik
On Apr 15, 2012, at 08:43 , Benson Margulies wrote:
I've been pestering you all with a series of questions about
disassembling and partially rescoring
Since I ended up with 'fund' instead of 'func' we're even. I made the
edit. I'd make some more if you answered more of my questions :-)
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
_val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery should
explain the *effect* of including an _val_ term in an ordinary query,
starting with a constant.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr
I found myself wanting to write ...
OR _query_:{!lucene fq=\a:b\}c:d
And then I started looking at query trees in the debugger, and found
myself thinking that there's no possible representation for this -- a
subquery with a filter, since the filters are part of the
RequestBuilder, not
2012/4/24 Mindaugas Žakšauskas min...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I maintain a distributed system which Solr is part of. The data which
is kept is Solr is permissioned and permissions are currently
implemented by taking the original user query, adding certain bits to
it which would make it return less
There is no such thing as a 'solr forum' or a 'solr forum account.'
If you are subscribed to this list, an email to the unsubscribe
address will unsubscribe you. If some intermediary or third party is
forwarding email from this list to you, no one here can help you.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:09
CoreContainer.java, in the method 'load', finds itself calling
loader.NewInstance with an 'fname' of Log4j of the slf4j backend is
'Log4j'.
e.g.:
2012-05-01 10:40:32,367 org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer - Unable
to load LogWatcher
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
logging as a by product.
Don't remember the issue # offhand. I think there was a dispute about what
should be done with it.
On May 1, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CoreContainer.java, in the method 'load', finds itself calling
loader.NewInstance with an 'fname' of Log4j
)
at
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer.initialize(CoreContainer.java:304)
at
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.java:101)
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mark Miller markrmil
So, I've got some code that stores the same documents in a Lucene
3.5.0 index and a Solr 3.5.0 instance. It's only five documents.
For a particular field, the Solr norm is always 0.625, while the
Lucene norm is .5.
I've watched the code in NormsWriterPerField in both cases.
In Solr we've got
.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I've got some code that stores the same documents in a Lucene
3.5.0 index and a Solr 3.5.0 instance. It's only five documents.
For a particular field, the Solr norm is always 0.625, while the
Lucene norm is .5
As in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages?
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: A followup. The wiki has a whole discussion of the 'update' XML
: message. But solrj has nothing like it. Does that really exist? Is
: there a reason to use
I'd like to have a field that transparently uses FastInfoset to store
XML compactly.
Ideally, I could supply the XML already in FIS format to solrj, but
have application retrieve the field and get the XML 'reconstituted'.
Obviously, I'm writing code here, but what? The field would be
There are two ways to characterize what I'd like to do.
1) use the EmbeddedSolrServer to launch Solr, and subsequently enable
the HTTP GET/json servlet. I can provide the 'servlet' wiring, I just
need to be able to hand an HttpServletRequest to something and
retrieve in return the same json that
I'm a bit puzzled while trying to adapt some pagination code in
javascript to a grouped query.
I'm using:
'group' : 'true',
'group.limit' : 5, // something to show ...
'group.field' : [ 'bt.nearDupCluster', 'bt.nearStoryCluster' ]
and displaying each field's worth in a tab. how do I work
) you can show the total number of
groups. group.limit tells Solr how many (max) documents you want to see
for each group.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm a bit puzzled while trying to adapt some pagination code in
javascript to a grouped query
of groups that matched the query.
NOTE: All this is in trunk, I'm not sure if it is on 3.3
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
What takes the place of response.response.numFound?
2011/7/1 Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com:
I'm not sure
Hey, I don't suppose you could easily tell me the rev in which ngroups arrived?
Also, how does ngroups compare to the 'matches' value inside each group?
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
2011/7/1 Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com:
I'm
The solr download link does not point to or mention nightly builds.
Are they out there?
signature.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tom Gross itconse...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2011 04:08 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
The solr download link does not point to or mention nightly builds.
Are they out there?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%2Bsolr+%2Bnightlybuildsl=1
--
Auther of the book
Launching solr-4.0-20110705.223601-1.war, I get a class cast exception
org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader cannot be cast to
org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexReader with the following backtrace.
I'm launching solr-as-a-webapp via an embedded copy of tomcat 7. The
location of the index is set
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: The reason for the email is not that I can't find them, but because
: the project, I claim, should be advertising them more prominently on
: the web site than buried in a wiki.
:
: Actually they are linked
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Then I would guess that you have other (older) jars in your classpath
somewhere. Does the example Solr installation work?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Launching solr-4.0-20110705.223601-1.war, I get
classpath
somewhere. Does the example Solr installation work?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Launching solr-4.0-20110705.223601-1.war, I get a class cast exception
org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader cannot be cast
I've got an index set up where there is a field that denotes
membership in a document cluster. By using a grouped query, I can get
a result grouped by cluster membership.
Gosh, I wish I could add one more thing to the top of this pile: sort
by group size. I'd like to have the ability demand sort
We find ourselves in the following quandry:
At initial index time, we store a value in a field, and we use it for
facetting. So it, seemingly, has to be there as a field.
However, from time to time, something happens that causes us to want
to change this value. As far as we know, this requires
a single document ought not to be slow, although if you have many
of them at once it could be, or if you end up needing to very frequently
commit to an index it can indeed cause problems.
From: Benson Margulies [bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20
We've got a tokenizer which is quite explicitly coded on the
assumption that it will only be called from one thread at a time.
After all, what would it mean for two threads to make interleaved
calls to the hasNext() function()?
Yet, a customer of ours with a gigantic instance of Solr 1.4 reports
There is an alternative to knowing the language at query:
multiply-process for stems or lemmas of all the possible languages.
This may well be a cure much worse than the disease.
Yes, LI can sell you our lemma-production capability.
--benson margulies
basis technology
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009
There are for-money solutions to this.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
Sounds like you need a TokenFilter that does lemmatisation. I don't know of
any open ones off hand, but I haven't looked all that hard.
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:25 AM, prerna07
On (at least) two occasions, I've opened JIRAs due to my getting tangled up
with eclipse, jetty, and solr/lib.
Well, it occurs to me that a recent idea might be of general use to others
in this regard.
This fragment is offered for illustration. The idea here is that you can
configure the jetty
I am thinking about trying to structure a problem as a Solr plugin. The
nature of the plugin is that it would need to read and write the lucene
index to do its work. It could not be cleanly split into URP 'over here'
and a Search Component 'over there'.
Are there invariants of Solr that would
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.1 claims that Solr3.1 is available in a
place where it is not, and I can't find a link on the front page to the
archive for old releases.
tanks.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/16/2013 2:21 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**Solr3.1http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.1claims
that Solr3.1 is available in a
place where it is not, and I can't find a link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
does not point to any information on solr.xml.
Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4791, I'm a bit
confused, and I need to set up a sharedLib directory for 4.3.0.
I would do some writing or linking if I had some raw material ...
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
does not point to any information on solr.xml
OK, I found the successor.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul
on a fork between 4791 and this.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I found the successor.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond
Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
On May 19, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/19/2013 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style str child to
configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
Caused
One point of confusion: Is the compatibility code I hit trying to
prohibit the 'str' form when it sees old-fangled cores? Or when the
current running version pre-5.0? I hope it's the former.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson
it is completely correct,
mind you) is that the presence of a cores tag defines which checks
are performed. Errors are thrown on old-style constructs when no
cores tag is present and vice-versa.
Best
Erick
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
One point
I'd like to run a repeatable test of having Solr ingest a corpus of
docs on disk, to measure the speed of some alternative things plugged
in.
Anyone have some advice to share? One approach would be a quick SolrJ
program that pushed the entire stack as one giant collection with a
commit at the
I can't quite apply SolrMeter to my problem, so I did something of my
own. The brains of the operation are the function here.
This feeds a ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer about 95 documents, each about
10mb, and 'threads' is six. Yet Solr just barely uses more than one
core.
private long
I am currently testing some things with Solr 4.0.0. I tried to make a
tokenizer CoreAware, and was rewarded with:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid 'Aware'
object: com.basistech.rlp.solr.RLPTokenizerFactory@19336006 --
org.apache.solr.util.plugin.SolrCoreAware must be an
The comment here is clearly wrong, since there is no division by two.
I think that the code is wrong, because this results in not starting
runners when it should start runners. Am I misanalyzing?
if (runners.isEmpty() || (queue.remainingCapacity() queue.size() // queue
// is
//
Ah. So now I have to find some other explanation of why it never
creates more than one thread, even when I make a very deep queue and
specify 6 threads.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Benson Margulies
.
If the idea is that we want to pile up 'a lot' (1/2-of-a-q) of work
before sending any of it, why start that first runner?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah. So now I have to find some other explanation of why it never
creates more than one
Could I have some help on the combination of these two? Right now, it
appears that I'm stuck with a finalizer to chase after native
resources in a Tokenizer. Am I missing something?
I am not a lawyer.
The Apache Software Foundation cannot 'protect Solr developers.'
Patent infringement is a claim made against someone who derived economic
benefit from an invention, not someone who writes code.
The patent clause in the Apache License requires people who contribute code
to
TokenizerFactory changed, incompatibly with subclasses, from 4.2.0 to
4.3.0. Subclasses must now implement a different overload of create, and
may not implement the old one.
Has anyone got any devious strategies other than multiple copies of code to
deal with this when supporting multiple
Using Solr Cloud with 4.3.1.
We've got a problem with a tokenizer that manifests as calling
OffsetAtt.setOffsets() with invalid inputs. OK, so, we want to figure out
what input provokes our code into getting into this pickle.
The problem happens on SolrCloud nodes.
The problem manifests as this
at 1:56 PM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
Using Solr Cloud with 4.3.1.
We've got a problem with a tokenizer that manifests as calling
OffsetAtt.setOffsets() with invalid inputs. OK, so, we want to figure out
what input provokes our code into getting into this pickle.
The problem
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
