I am sure this is 101 question, but I am bit confused about indexing xml data
using SOLR.
I have rich xml content (books) that need to searched at granular levels
(specifically paragraph and sentence levels very accurately, no
approximations). My source text has exact p/p and s/s tags for
).
wunder
On 11/7/07 8:18 PM, David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure this is 101 question, but I am bit confused about indexing
xml data
using SOLR.
I have rich xml content (books) that need to searched at granular
levels
(specifically paragraph and sentence levels very accurately
Thanks -- C-Data might be useful -- and I was looking into dynamic fields as
solution as well -- I think a combination of the two might work.
- Original Message
From: Hausherr, Jens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2007 4:03:02 AM
Subject:
Is it possible to find boolean matches (foo AND bar) in a single unique
instance of a multi-value field. So if foo is found in one instance of
multi-value field, and is also found in another instance of the multi-value
field -- this WOULD NOT be a match, but only if both words are found in
Chris
I'll try to track down your Jira issue.
(2) sounds very helpful -- I am only 2 days old in SOLR/Lucene experience, but
know what I need -- and basically its to search by the main granules in an xml
document, with usually turn out to be for books book (rarley), chapter (more
often),
(at least, storing Xpath information is one of the
proposed uses: http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2007/03/18/payloads/ ),
as Erik Hatcher suggested in relation to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-380 .
Peter
-Original Message-
From: David Neubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Sorry for another basic question -- but what is the best safe way to delete all
docs in a SOLR index.
I tried deleteid:*/delete -- and that didn't work, plus wasn't sure if it
was safe -- when I put a real id in it works, but that is too tedious.
I am in my first few days using SOLR and
Thanks!
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:48:45 PM
Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?
I tried deleteid:*/delete
try:
deletequery*:*/query/delete
ryan
Thanks!
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:51:03 PM
Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?
: Sorry for another basic question -- but what is the best safe way to
: delete all docs in a SOLR
is to stop Solr and remove the index directory. There is
less chance of corruption, and it will faster.
-Original Message-
From: David Neubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?
Thanks
(like power loss).
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: David Neubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?
Thanks!
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all,
Using SOLR, I believe I have to index the same content 4 times (not desirable)
into 2 indexes -- and I don't know how you can practically do multiple indexes
in SOLR (if indeed there is no better solution than 4 indexing runs into two
indexes?
My need is case-sensitive and case
Ryan,
Thanks for your response. I infer from your response that you can have a
different analyzer for each field -- I guess I should have figured that out
--but because I had not thought of that, I concluded that I needed multiple
indices (sorry , I am still very new to Solr/Lucene).
Does
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
David Neubert wrote:
Ryan,
Thanks for your response. I infer from your response that you can
have a different analyzer for each field
yes! each field can have its own indexing strategy.
I believe
indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
On Nov 10, 2007 4:24 PM, David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I am hitting multiple fields (in the same search request) that
invoke different Analyzers -- am I at a dead end, and have to result to
consequetive multiple queries
own case field with the
per-book setting attached at index time.
Erik
On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:55 AM, David Neubert wrote:
Yonik (or anyone else)
Do you know where on-line documentation on the +case: syntax is
located? I can't seem to find it.
Dave
- Original Message
to render I, he,
him, instead of the indexed acronym.
- Original Message
From: David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:54:11 PM
Subject: Associating pronouns instances to proper nouns?
All,
I am working with very exact text and search
-of-lucene perspective,
so
don't
even *think* of asking me how to really make this work in SOLR G.
Best
Erick
On Nov 11, 2007 12:44 AM, David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan (and others who need something to put them so sleep :) )
Wow -- the light-bulb finally went off -- the Analzyer admin page
references including pronouns?
Anybody see any holes in this? (sounds alarmingly easy so far)?
Dave
- Original Message
From: David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 3:04:20 PM
Subject: Re: Associating pronouns instances to proper
I purchased Lucene In Action (really great book by the way, one of the best
technical books (if not the best) that I can ever read.
Its making me embarrassed about some of the questions I have already posted :)
That said, here is another one -- I found LuceneInAction.zip on
20 matches
Mail list logo
