http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers
http://www.lucidimagination.com/developer/Community/Application-Showcase-Wiki
-Original message-
From: Girish Pandit pandit.gir...@gmail.com
Sent: Sun 26-09-2010 14:16
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: how are you using Solr?
I am
You can use copyField to get multiple fields in the field you use for spell
checking, don't forget to set it to multiValued.
-Original message-
From: Savannah Beckett savannah_becket...@yahoo.com
Sent: Mon 27-09-2010 10:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: spellcheck on
You could create a custom update processor that adds a digest field for newly
added documents that do not have the digest field themselves. This way, the
documents that are not added by Nutch get a proper non-empty digest field so
the deduplication processor won't create the same empty hash and
Hi,
Did you post your documents in UTF-8? Also, for querying through GET using
non-ascii you must reconfigure Tomcat6 as per the manual [1].
Cheers,
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat#URI_Charset_Config
ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS zei:
Hi there
Iâm using solr 1.4 under
languages.
So you would have a field type like:
fieldType name=en_text class=solr.TextField ...
analyzer type=
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory words=stopwords.en.txt
filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synoyms.en.txt
etc etc.
Cheers,
-
Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V
Hello Kelly,
I am not entirely sure if i understand your problem correctly. But i
believe your first approach is the right one.
Your question: Which products are available that contain skus with color
Green, size M, and a price of $9.99 or less? can be easily answered using
a schema like yours.
...
-- sku id = 7 [color=green, size=S, price=10.99]
-- sku id = 9 [color=green, size=L, price=10.99]
-- sku id = 10 [color=blue, size=S, price=9.99]
-- sku id = 11 [color=blue, size=M, price=10.99]
-- sku id = 12 [color=blue, size=L, price=10.99]
Regards,
Kelly
Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V
Hello,
I now believe that i really did misunderstand the problem and,
unfortunately, i don't believe i can be of much assistance as i did not
have to implement a similar problem.
Cheers,
-
Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V.
Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c
http
Hello all,
I have installed and reconfigured everything according to the readme supplied
with the recent LucidGaze release. Files have been written in the gaze
directory in SOLR_HOME but the *.log.x.y files are all empty! The rrd directory
does contain something that is about 24MiB.
In the
Hi,
Is the list without clue or should i mail Lucid directly?
Cheers,
I have installed and reconfigured everything according to the readme
supplied with the recent LucidGaze release. Files have been written in the
gaze directory in SOLR_HOME but the *.log.x.y files are all empty! The rrd
Hello Frank,
Answers are inline:
Frank van Lingen said:
I recently started working with solr and find it easy to setup and
tinker with.
I now want to scale up my setup and was wondering if there is an
application/component that can do the following (I was not able to find
documentation on
Hello Andre,
We have used this approach before. We did keep all our data in a RDBMS but
added serialized objects to the index so we could simply query the record
and display it as is, without any hassle and SQL connections.
Although storing this data sounds a bit strange, it actually works well
Check out Jetty's output or Tomcat's logs. The logging is very verbose and
you can get a clearer picture.
Jennifer Luo said:
I am using example, only with two fields, id and body. Id is string
field, body is text field.
I use another program to do a http post to update the document, url is
://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm#Dist
Cheers,
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
the onlyMorePopular directive fool you, it caught many users of
guard before :)
Cheers,
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
name=spellcheckIndexDirspellcheckerfile/str
/lst
/searchComponent
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/spellcheck-tp27527425p27548078.html Sent from the
Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http
/str
str name=spellcheck.dictionaryexternal/str
/lst
arr name=last-components
strquery/str
strspellcheck/str
strmlt/str
/arr
/requestHandler
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
darniz said:
Hello All
Please reply to this ASAP
I am using indexbasedSpellchecker right now i copy only model, and make
names and some other fields to my spellcheck field.
Hence my spell check field consists of only 120 words.
The issue is if i type hond i get back honda which is fine.
Although the wiki states it correctly (will also return suggestions even
if properly spelled), perhaps we should add that it's a better practice to
only present end users with suggestions if the correctlySpelled flag is
false.
This issue keeps coming back.
Chris Hostetter said:
: I have a
Hi Peter,
It depends on what you call a debug log and how you interface with Solr.
Anyway, if you use Solr over HTTP you can check out the logs of your
servlet container and configure the logging behaviour on the Solr web
admin page. Usually, the default logging is quite useful. Either way, see
in Solr 1.5:
- field collapsing
- Solr Spatial
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 14:42:18 Grant Ingersoll wrote:
What would it be?
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Markus Jelsma mar...@buyways.nl wrote:
- stemmers for many more different languages
I don't want to hijack this thread, but i would like to know which
languages you are interested in!
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
2010 14:42:18 Grant Ingersoll wrote:
What would it be?
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
-spell-dictionary-tp27950854p27950921.html Sent
from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
it will help me understand the
backslash \ also better.
Thanks,
Mark.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Markus Jelsma mar...@buyways.nl wrote:
Hi,
Check out the wiki page on the SynonymFilterFactory. It gives a decent
explantion on the subject. The backslash is just for escaping otherwise
highlighting is only working with tokenized fields, f.i., it worked with
text and another type I defined. Is this true, or I'm making a mistake that
is preventing me to have the highlighting option working on string?
Thanks for your help.
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http
board
with a sentence written largely on it, have the students physically
*tokenize* the document by cutting it up and lexicographically building
the term dictionary. Thoughts on taking it further welcome!
Thanks all.
Erik
Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http
Hi,
Are there plans for bringing distributed capabilities for the external file
field? I've not seem any hints for this in the work in distributed indexing,
nor on the wiki or elsewhere.
Will we be able to send a very large file and have it sliced up and have the
values sent to the designated
Hi,
We're doing some tests with the latest trunk revision on a cluster of five
high-end machines. There is one collection, five shards and one replica per
shard on some other node.
We're filling the index from a MapReduce job, 18 processes run concurrently.
This is plenty when indexing to a
the errors were coming in
but it did not exceed 11k at any given time.
How did you check the number of filedescriptors used? Did you get this
number from the system info handler
(http://hotname:8983/solr/admin/system?indent=onwt=json) or somehow
differently?
--
Sami Siren
--
Markus Jelsma
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 17:52:55 Sami Siren wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Sami,
As superuser:
$ lsof | wc -l
But, just now, i also checked the system handler and it told me:
str name=ulimit(error executing: ulimit
Thanks. They are set properly. But i misspelled the tomcat6 username in
limits.conf :(
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 18:08:55 Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
The Linux machines have proper settings for ulimit and friends
Hi,
Yesterday we had an issue with too many open files, which was solved
because a username was misspelled. But there is still a problem with
open files.
We cannot succesfully index a few millions documents from MapReduce to
a 5-node Solr cloud cluster. One of the problems is that after a
a sneaky work-around :)
Regards
Bernd
Am 01.03.2012 11:36, schrieb Markus Jelsma:
Hi,
Yesterday we had an issue with too many open files, which was solved
because a username was misspelled. But there is still a problem with
open files.
We cannot succesfully index a few
Looks like you have a bad value where a boolean is expected in your
solrconfig.xml.
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:09:11 +0100, alessio crisantemi
alessio.crisant...@gmail.com wrote:
is true.
this is the slr problem:
mar 03, 2012 12:08:04 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
Grave:
Hi,
With auto-committing disabled we can now index many millions of
documents in our test environment on a 5-node cluster with 5 shards and
a replication factor of 2. The documents are uploaded from map/reduce.
No significant changes were made to solrconfig and there are no update
processors
...@openindex.io
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
hmm, loks like you are facing exactly the phenomena I asked about.
See my question here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.solr.user/61326
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:09:30 -0500, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mar 4, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
everything stalls after it lists all segment files and that a ZK
state change has occured.
Can you get a stack trace here? I'll try to respond to more tomorrow.
What
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:26:20 -0500, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mar 5, 2012, at 10:01 AM, dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
If one of those 10 indexing nodes goes down or falls out of sync and
comes
back, does ZK block the state of indexing until that single node
catches
back up?
I would first attempt to underline or assign another colour if the
scheme allows for it before increasing font size.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:50:15 -0700, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do you highlight terms in languages without boldface or italic
modes? Maybe raise the text size a
entries are?
Happy
to post any more information as needed.
Cheers,
Colin
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536600 / 06-50258350
middle byte
0xe3 (at char #10, byte #-1).
Could anyone tell me how to solve it?
Thanks very much.
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536600 / 06-50258350
Can you try spellcheck.q ?
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:57:19 +0100, tom dev.tom.men...@gmx.net wrote:
hi folks,
i think i found a bug in the spellchecker but am not quite sure:
this is the query i send to solr:
http://lh:8983/solr/CompleteIndex/select?
rows=0
echoParams=all
spellcheck=true
.
eg
autoCommit
maxTime15000/maxTime
openSearcherfalse/openSearcher
/autoCommit
--
-IC
- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.facebook.com/universidad.uci
http://www.flickr.com/photos/universidad_uci
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536600 / 06-50258350
I'm doing wrong?
I'm using Solr 3.4.
Thanks,
Elisabeth
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
on this because there seems to be a diverse range
of opinions on this.
Regards,
James
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Securing-Solr-under-Tomcat-IP-best-way-
tp3899929p3899929.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
--
Markus Jelsma
Accept only what you need (ports incoming/outgoing) for specific
trusted clients. Decide for protocols such as ICMP, DNS, NTP, SSH and of
course HTTP and drop all other coming in and reject going out. Beyond
this you can also configure some protection for bad packets.
There are plenty of
the RNI URP to the chain
for xml updates --
requestHandler name=/update
class=solr.XmlUpdateRequestHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=update.chainRNI/str
/lst
/requestHandler
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536600
you can search more successfully?
Michael
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
. It still
yields strange results when it emits tokens that are subwords of a subword.
paul
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
.
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
Hi,
We've increased Zookeepers znode size limit to accomodate for some larger
dictionaries and other files. It isn't the best idea to increase the maximum
znode size. Any plans for splitting up larger files and storing them with
multi? Does anyone have another suggestion?
Thanks,
Markus
it autocompress
files larger than N bytes? And how should we detect if data is compressed when
reading from ZooKeeper?
On Thursday 03 May 2012 14:04:31 Mark Miller wrote:
On May 3, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Hi,
We've increased Zookeepers znode size limit to accomodate for some
?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-change-the-default-format-for-tstamp-tp3970751p3971251.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
Please ask Nutch related questions only on the Nutch users mailing
list.
Thanks.
On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:18:37 -0700 (PDT), forwardswing
wangweiz...@sohu.com wrote:
who can help me ?
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
Deduplication on SolrCloud through the SignatureUpdateRequestProcessor is not
functional anymore. The problem is that documents are passed multiple times
through the URP and the digest field is added as if it is an multi valued
field.
If the field is not multi valued you'll get this
Hi,
Interesting! I'm watching the issues and will test as soon as they are
committed.
Thanks!
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Fri 18-May-2012 16:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Subject: Re: SolrCloud
you're right. I'll test the patch as soon as possible.
Thanks!
-Original message-
From:Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
Sent: Fri 18-May-2012 18:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: SolrCloud deduplication
: Interesting! I'm watching the issues and will
Hi,
SOLR-2822 seems to work just fine as long as the SignatureProcessor precedes
the DistributedProcessor in the update chain.
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Fri 18-May-2012 16:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Markus Jelsma
as the SignatureProcessor precedes
the DistributedProcessor in the update chain.
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Fri 18-May-2012 16:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Subject: Re: SolrCloud
:39 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Hi again,
It seemed to work fine but in the end duplicates are not overwritten. We
first run the SignatureProcessor and then the DistributedProcessor. If we
do it the other way around the digest field receives multiple values and
throws errors
Hi,
We just tested indexing some million docs from Hadoop to a 10 node 2 rep
SolrCloud cluster with this week's trunk. One of the nodes gave an OOM but
indexing continued without interruption. When i restarted the node indexing
stopped completely, the node tried to recover - which was
Hi,
We wiped clean the data directories for one node. That node is never able to
recover and regularly runs OOM. On another cluster (with an older build,
september 10th) memory consumption on recovery is fairly low when recoverign
and with only a 250MB heap allocated it's easy to recover two
be out of whack?
|
| On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Markus Jelsma
| markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
| Hi,
|
| We use trunk but got SolrJ 4.0 from Maven. Creating an instance of
| CloudSolrServer fails because its constructor calls a not existing
| LBServer constructor, it attempts
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud indexing blocks if node is recovering
Doesn't sound right. Still have the logs?
- Mark
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
We just tested indexing some million docs from Hadoop to a 10 node 2 rep
of the trunk work around allowing any Directory impl to
replicate. JIRA pls :)
- Mark
On Oct 30, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
wrote:
Hi,
We're testing again with today's trunk and using the new Lucene 4.1 format
by default. When nodes are not restarted
file a JIRA to track
looking into it.
- Mark
On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
wrote:
That's 5, the actual trunk/
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Wed 31-Oct-2012 16:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
CloudSolrServer
I think the maven jars must be out of whack?
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
We use trunk but got SolrJ 4.0 from Maven. Creating an instance of
CloudSolrServer fails because its constructor calls a not existing LBServer
1, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
File bug?
Please.
- Mark
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4038
Still trying to gather the logs
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Sat 03-Nov-2012 14:17
To: Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud indexing
Hi,
We do not want to store positions for some fields or omit term and positions
(or just tf) for other fields. Obviously we don't need/want explicit phrase
matching on the fields we want to configure without positions, but (e)dismax
doesn't let us. All text fields configured in the QF
Hi,
Your Nutch schema likely points to the old EnglishPorterFilter that doesn't
exist anymore. You can change that occurance to PorterStemFilterFactory, that
should fix the issue.
-Original message-
From:Antony Steiner ant.stei...@gmail.com
Sent: Thu 08-Nov-2012 14:05
To:
change anything. Should I
post the full stacktrace?
Regards
Antony
2012/11/8 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Hi,
Your Nutch schema likely points to the old EnglishPorterFilter that
doesn't exist anymore. You can change that occurance to
PorterStemFilterFactory
:54
To: Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io; solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Nutch 1.5.1 + Apache Solr 4.0
Hi,
I just saw there is a schema-solr4.xml and a schema.xml in the nutch conf
directory. But with both schemas I get the same errors when starting up
solr.
Heres
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 5:01 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax
Hi,
We do not want to store positions for some fields or omit term and positions
(or just tf) for other fields
Hi,
We're testing a large multi lingual index with _LANG fields for each language
and using dismax to query them all. Users provide, explicit or implicit,
language preferences that we use for either additive or multiplicative boosting
on the language of the document. However, additive boosting
Hi - i think you're seeing:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3993
-Original message-
From:Bill Au bill.w...@gmail.com
Sent: Thu 08-Nov-2012 21:16
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: best practice for restarting the entire SolrCloud cluster
I have a simple
if you have any 3.x segments in
your index.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
We're testing a large multi lingual index with _LANG fields for each
language and using dismax to query them all. Users provide, explicit or
implicit
hi - Check the Extracting Request Handler manual:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
-Original message-
From:veena rani veenara...@gmail.com
Sent: Mon 12-Nov-2012 10:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How Index word document in solr.
Hi,
Please
Hi - instead of trying to make the system ingest such large files perhaps you
can split the files in many small pieces.
-Original message-
From:mitra mitra.re...@ornext.com
Sent: Tue 13-Nov-2012 09:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Indexing MAX FILE LIMIT
Hello
Hi - you're likely seeing a drop in performance because of durability which is
enabled by default via a transaction log. When disabled 4.0 is iirc slightly
faster than 3.x.
-Original message-
From:Nils Weinander nils.weinan...@gmail.com
Sent: Thu 15-Nov-2012 10:35
To:
Hi,
I stumbled upon SOLR-4037 again and this time restarting with a clean Zookeeper
gave a very interesting error log:
2012-11-16 11:05:51,876 INFO [solr.core.SolrCore] - [Thread-4] - : Closing
SolrCoreState
2012-11-16 11:05:51,876 INFO [solr.update.DefaultSolrCoreState] - [Thread-4] -
:
Solr is provides availability and it is tolerant to partioning so that leaves
consistency. It is eventual consistent.
-Original message-
From:Bill Au bill.w...@gmail.com
Sent: Fri 16-Nov-2012 15:00
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: consistency in SolrCloud replication
Hi,
We're seeing high prepare times for the QueryComponent, obviously due to the
vast amount of field and queries. It's common to have a prepare time of 70-80ms
while the process times drop significantly due to warmed searchers, OS cache
etc. The prepare time is a recurring issue and i'd hope
I'd also like to know which parts of the entire query constitute the prepare
time and if it would matter significantly if we extend the edismax plugin and
hardcode the parameters we pass into (reusable) objects.
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Markus Jelsma
, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
I'd also like to know which parts of the entire query constitute the
prepare time and if it would matter significantly if we extend the edismax
plugin and hardcode the parameters we pass into (reusable) objects.
Thanks
.
Nothing more useful from me.
Bye.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi,
Profiling pointed me directly to the method i already suspected:
ExtendedDismaxQParser.parse(). I added manual timers in parts of the method
and made sure
Hi,
We need the recip function's m-parameter to take other functions e.g.
recip(dateField, div(1,prod(1,2)), 1,1) but ValueSourceParser want to read a
float instead. How could we modifiy either Solr or Lucene as well to take
functions for that parameter? I've been looking at the various
See:
http://nutch.apache.org/apidocs-2.1/org/apache/nutch/crawl/AdaptiveFetchSchedule.html
-Original message-
From:nutchsolruser nutchsolru...@gmail.com
Sent: Fri 23-Nov-2012 06:53
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr UIMA with KEA
Is there any way we can extract tags
Sorry, wrong list :)
-Original message-
From:Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Sent: Fri 23-Nov-2012 08:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr UIMA with KEA
See:
http://nutch.apache.org/apidocs-2.1/org/apache/nutch/crawl/AdaptiveFetchSchedule.html
Hi - check the new spellchecker collate options. It limits spellchecker
suggestions to the fq restrictions. If you filter on specific hosts, the
spellchecker will only provide suggestions that are found in that host. Same
goes for language.
Seems you got this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4032
-Original message-
From:deniz denizdurmu...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 27-Nov-2012 05:04
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SolrCloud(5x) - Errors while recovering
Here is briefly what is happening:
I have
Hi - no we're not getting any errors because we enabled positions on all fields
that are also listed in the qf-parameter. If we don't, and send a phrase query
we would get an error such as:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: field h1 was indexed without position data;
cannot run
PhraseQuery
It only seems to happen if a node dies while indexing.
-Original message-
From:deniz denizdurmu...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 27-Nov-2012 10:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: SolrCloud(5x) - Errors while recovering
another update
having 300K docs causes the same error...
Hi, please check this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226
But it is enabled because of:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4509
Since it's suddenly default you would have to completely wipe the index and
reindex the data, at least i had to, because of numerous
a phrase and the field does not have
positions, a BooleanQuery with MUST would be generated instead of the
PhraseQuery.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: positions and qf
This issue adds the SpanFirstQuery to edismax.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3925
It unfortuntately cannot produce progressively higher boosts if the term is
closer to the beginning.
-Original message-
From:Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com
Sent: Fri 30-Nov-2012
Hi, try updating your check out, i think that's fixed now.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4117
-Original message-
From:Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org
Sent: Fri 30-Nov-2012 22:21
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Exceptions in branch_4x log
This is branch_4x,
Hi,
We're suddenly seeing a shard called `properties` in the cloud graph page when
testing today's trunk with a clean Zookeeper data directory. Any idea where it
comes from? We have not changed the solr.xml on any node.
Thanks
101 - 200 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
