Hi,
I am using Solr1.4 for searching through half a million documents. The
problem is, I want to retrieve nearly 200 documents for each search query.
The query time in Solr logs is showing 0.02 seconds and I am fairly happy
with that. However Solr is taking a long time (4 to 5 secs) to return the
on how different Solr components perform we injected
perf4j statements into key points in the code. And a profiler was helpful
too.
Hope it helps somehow.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Raghuveer Kancherla
raghuveer.kanche...@aplopio.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Solr1.4 for searching through
Hi Andrew,
I applied the patch you suggested. I am not finding any significant changes
in the response times.
I am wondering if I forgot some important configuration setting etc.
Here is what I did:
1. Wrote a small program using solrj to use EmbeddedSolrServer (most of
the code is from the
Thanks Hoss,
In my previous mail, I was measuring the system time difference between
sending a (http) request and receiving a response. This was being run on a
(different) client machine
Like you suggested, I tried to time the response on the server itself as
follows:
$ /usr/bin/time -p curl -sS
(time for Solr to
return the http response) is very close to the QTime Solr is showing in the
logs.
Thanks for all the help,
Raghu
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Raghuveer Kancherla
raghuveer.kanche...@aplopio.com wrote:
Thanks Hoss,
In my previous mail, I was measuring the system time
Hi Hoss,
I was experimenting with various queries to solve this problem and in one
such test I remember that requesting only the ID did not change the
retrieval time. To be sure, I tested it again using the curl command today
and it confirms my previous observation.
Also, enableLazyFieldLoading
... .and that was the only
change you made and got cca x10 search performance improvement?
Sorry for repeating your words, just trying to confirm and understand.
Thanks,
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Raghuveer Kancherla
2 ways I can think of ...
- ExtractingRequestHandler (this is what I am guessing you are using now)
Set extractOnly=true while making a request to the extractingRequestHandler
and get the parsed content back. Now make a post request on update request
handler with what ever fields and field
Hi,
I am looking for a way to use payloads in my search application. Indexing
data with payloads into Solr is pretty straightforward. However using the
payloads during search time is a bit confusing. Can anyone point me in the
right direction to enable payloads on a *PhraseQuery*. I looked at the
I was looking through some lucene source codes and found the following class
org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.PayloadSpanUtil
There is a function named queryToSpanQuery in this class. Is this the
preferred way to convert a PhraseQuery to PayloadNearQuery?
Also, are there any performance
Hi,
Thanks everyone for the responses, I am now able to get both phrase queries
and term queries to use payloads.
However the the score value for each document (and consequently, the
ordering of documents) are coming out wrong.
In the solr output appended below, document 4 has a score higher
somewhere that this is
deprecated .. but i was just experimenting) and the scoring seems to work as
expected now for a single term.
Now, the important question is what is the Payload version of a TermQuery?
Regards
Raghu
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Raghuveer Kancherla
raghuveer.kanche
Its likely that your analyzer has WordDelimiterFilterFactory (look at your
schema for the field in question).
If a single token is split into more tokens during the analysis phase, solr
will do a phrase query instead of a term query.
In your case disk/1.0 is being analyzed into disk 1 0 (three
Hi,
With help from the group here, I have been able to set up a search
application with payloads enabled. However, there is a noticeable increase
in query response times with payloads as compared to the same queries
without payloads. I am also seeing a lot more disk IO (I have a 7200 rpm
disk) and
if a ramDirectory will help
instead of the default Directory implementation for the indexReader?
Thanks,
Raghu
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Dec 17, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Raghuveer Kancherla wrote:
Hi,
With help from the group here, I have been able
Based on your need you can choose one of the options listed at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
- Raghu
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Olala hthie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I have developed Solr on Tomcat, but now I want to building many Solr on
only one Tomcat server.Is
Hi Dipti,
Just out of curiosity, are you trying to use RAMDirectory for improvement in
speed? I tried doing that and did not see any significant improvement. Would
be nice to know what your experiment shows.
- Raghu
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have 2 fields one with captures the category of the documents and an other
which is a pre processed text of the document. Text of the document is
fairly large.
The category of the document changes often while the text remains the same.
Search happens on both fields.
The problem is, I have
Is this feature planned in any of the future releases. I ask because it will
help me plan my system architecture accordingly.
Thanks,
Raghu
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Raghuveer Kancherla
19 matches
Mail list logo
