I've been trying to get More like this running under solr 3.5. I get the
Exception below. The http request is also highlighted below.
I've looked at the FieldType code and I don't understand what's going on there.
So, while I know what a null pointer exception means, it isn't telling me what
This turned out to be SOLR-2986.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Smith [mailto:ssm...@mainstreamdata.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 1:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Exception in Solr server on more like this
I've been trying to get More like this running under
Suppose I have a special data search type (something different than a string or
numeric value) that I want to integrate into the Solr server. For example,
suppose I wanted to implement a KD-tree as a filter that would integrate with
standard Solr filters and queries. I might want to say find
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll take a look at these things.
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:mkhlud...@griddynamics.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom Solr indexer/searcher
Scott,
It sounds like you
I'm looking for an ANTLR parser that consumes solr queries and filters. Before
I write my own, thought I'd ask if anyone has one they are willing to share or
can point me to one?
Thanks
Scott
I've been using lucene for a number of years. We've now decided to move to
SOLR. I have a couple of questions.
1. I'm used to creating Boolean queries, filter queries, term queries,
etc. for lucene. Am I right in thinking that for SOLR my only option is
creating string queries (with
:
On 9/15/2011 8:30 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
2. Assuming that the answer to 1 is correct, then is there an easy
way to take a lucene query (with nested Boolean queries, filter queries,
etc.) and generate a SOLR query string with q and fq components?
I believe that Query.toString
Wasn't sure which mailing list to send this to. I'm writing an application
that can be configured to run directly with lucene or with solr and I'm trying
to figure out whether optimization of the index should be totally eliminated,
eliminated in the lucene case only or what.
If I read the 3.5
I'm implementing a MoreLikeThis search. I have a couple of questions. I'm
implementing this with solrj so I would appreciate it if any code snippets
reflect that.
First, I want to provide the text that Solr should check for interesting
words and do the search on. This means I don't want to
I realized I probably should have said Solr 3.5 in case that makes a difference.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Smith [mailto:ssm...@mainstreamdata.com]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 2:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: MoreLikeThis questions
I'm implementing
-Original Message-
From: Scott Smith [mailto:ssm...@mainstreamdata.com]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 3:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: MoreLikeThis questions
I realized I probably should have said Solr 3.5 in case that makes a difference.
-Original Message
I just want to state a couple of things and hear someone say, that's right.
1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q. And
yes, I can simply AND the multiple qs together. Just want to avoid that if
I'm wrong.
2. A subtler issue is that when a full query
I promised to ask this on the forum just to confirm what I assume is true.
Suppose you're returning results using a sort order based on some field (so,
not relevancy). For example, suppose it's a date field which indicates when the
document was loaded into the solr index. Suppose two items
I need to provide a custom sort option for sorting by price and I would like
some suggestions. It's not the straightforward just sort by a price field in
the document scenario or I wouldn't be asking for help. Here's the scenario
I'm dealing with.
I have 100 million+ documents (so
to solr; something like this
http://java.dzone.com/articles/connecting-redis-solr-boosting
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Scott Smith ssm...@mainstreamdata.com
wrote:
There are likely several hundred groups. Also, new groups will be
added and some groups will be deleted. So, I don't think
I'm creating a custom function (extends ValueSource). I'm generating a value
that will both be returned as a value in the hit for each doc and also be used
to sort. As I read the documentation, this is not difficult.
To determine the value for a document, I need to access the stored fields
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:hastings.recurs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 7:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Facet? Search problem
Perhaps look into grouping on that field.
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:08 PM, Sco
/confluence/display/solr/Collapse+and+Expand+Results
might be worth a look as well.
-Stefan
On Mar 14, 2017 7:25 PM, "Scott Smith" <ssm...@mainstreamdata.com> wrote:
> Grouping appears to be exactly what I'm looking for. I added
> "group=true=category" to my sea
I'm trying to solve a search problem and wondering if facets (or something
else) might solve the problem.
Let's assume I have a bunch of documents (100 million+). Each document has a
category (keyword) assigned to it. A single document my only have one
category, but there may be multiple
19 matches
Mail list logo
