Hi,
If I want to filter a search result to not return all fields as per
the default but I don't know what field my hits will be in.
This is basically for unstructured document type data, for example
large HTML or DOCBOOK documents.
thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
allartikel.dtd
In XML file in the same folder as the DTD allartikel.dtd
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
not to be compatible with
the newest versions of Lucene...
version of solr is 3.1.0
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
name=Optimized2011-04-18 11:55:48/str
str name=Total Documents Processed0/str
str name=Time taken 0:0:0.922/str
/lst
−
str name=WARNING
This response format is experimental. It is likely to change in the future.
/str
/response
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:46 AM, bryan rasmussen
rasmussen.br
fields
I get
response
−
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime0/int
−
lst name=params
str name=indenton/str
str name=start0/str
str name=qMomsManual/str
str name=version2.2/str
str name=rows10/str
/lst
/lst
result name=response numFound=0 start=0/
/response
:(
Thanks,
Bryan
solrQueryParser defaultOperator=AND/
/schema
the protwords.txt and stopwords.txt are also from the rss example.
thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:55 PM, lboutros boutr...@gmail.com wrote:
If a document contains multiple 'txt' fields, it should be marked as
'multiValued'.
field name=txt
Hmm, ok I see the schema was wrong - I was calling the TEXT field
txt... also now I am getting results on my title search after another
restart and reindex - setting the TXT fields to be multiValued.
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:09 PM, bryan rasmussen
rasmussen.br
) they all get indexed.
Any explanation for something I might have overlooked in configuration
that would be having this effect?
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
Hi,
I was wondering if I have a large number of queries I want to test
stemming on if there is a free standing library I can just run it
against without having to do all the overhead of a http request?
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
was hoping for something similar to a wordnet of stems...
but at worst I would be fine with checking specifically against my
index - I just didn't necessarily want to automate the browser to do
it as I figured it would be extra performance intensive.
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:19
that looks like a good starting point,
thanks,
bryan rasmussen
2011/4/19 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com:
I would start here:
http://snowball.tartarus.org/
François
On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:15 AM, bryan rasmussen wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if I have a large number
I am asking specifically because I am wondering if it is worth my time
too read the Enterprise server book or if there is too much of a
branch between the two?
If I read the book are there any parts of the book specifically that
won't be relevant?
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
ok, I just saw the thing about syncing the version numbers.
Is there any information on these Solr 3.1 books? Publishers,
publication dates, website on them?
Mvh,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Hi,
Solr IS an enterprise search server
?
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
Ah never mind, I had to restart my instance in order for my changes to
the dataimporter to register.
thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:19 PM, bryan rasmussen
rasmussen.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it the DIH XPathEntityProcessor will not allow me to
index
thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
to be actual
elements (hl.fomatter maybe?)
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:25 PM, bryan rasmussen
rasmussen.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If I do a search
http://localhost:8983/solr/tester/select/?q=kongerigethl=true then in
the lst name=highlighting subtree I get
arr name
to see in the first 10 results. funny.
thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Just checking, but have you tried setting
hl.fragsize=very large number as suggested here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.fragsize
to return f1 if it has the value that is found in the search.
Is this doable? Can you show me an example?
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
if you never want to see a result for a field set stored = false.
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Romi romijain3...@gmail.com wrote:
In my schema.xml file i made a filed attribute indexed=false and stored=true.
ie. i am not indexing this field but still in my
it is because the non-indexed
field is stored.
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Romi romijain3...@gmail.com wrote:
if i do stored=false then it indexes the data but not shows the data in
search result. but in my case i do not want to index the data for a field
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
content and reindex using the new schema, with lots of
stopping and restarting involved.
So - delete index, restart with new schema, index content with new schema.
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Romi romijain3...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks a lot bryan: it might be again
with the new schema.
I've had the situation a number of times where I have changed the
indexing rule for a field and not followed these steps and been
surprised when my index does not follow my expectations - and it seems
like you are experiencing the same thing.
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
in indexed fields.
It does seem somewhat counter-intuitive.
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
I would expect that it doesn't understand CDATA and thinks of
everything between and as a 'tag'.
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ellery Leung elleryle...@be-o.com wrote:
I have an XML string like this:
?xml version=1.0
encoding=UTF-8?languageintl