Hi Adam,
With FunctionQuery (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery) DateMath (
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/util/DateMathParser.html)
- round to the day level, subtract divide by milliseconds_in_a_day
(86400K).
Hi Susheel,
You might be able to pull something off using facet.prefix:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.prefix.
Will work when the prefix is exact and doesn't require any analysis,
something along these lines:
Hi Sandeep,
You are quite likely below capacity with this current set-up:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems#OS_Disk_Cache
Few things for you to confirm:
1. Which version of Solr are you using?
2. The size of your index.
- Are fields stored? How much are these stored fields
Upayavira - Nice idea pushing in a nominal update when all fields are
stored, and it does work. The nominal update could be sent to a boolean
type dynamic field, that's not to be used for anything other than maybe
identifying documents that are done re-indexing.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:47 PM,
:
Aloke Ghoshal i'm trying to work out your equation. i am using standard
scheme provided by nutch for solr and not aware of how to calculate
myfieldwordcount in first query.no idea where this count will come
from. is there any filter that will store number of tokens generated
Something you could do via function queries. Performance (for 500+ words)
is a doubtful.
1) With a separate float field (myfieldwordcount) that holds the count of
words from your query field (myfield):
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?wt=xmlindent=truedefType=func
fl=id,myfield
Hi David,
A separate Solr document for each section is a good option if you also need
to handle phrases, case, special characters, etc. within the title field.
How do you map them to dynamic fields?
E.g.: Appendix for cities, APPENDIX 1: Cities
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM,
Hi Shahzad,
Have you tried with the Minimum Should Match feature:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
You can take your words, combine some % of
Hi,
Try the UNC path instead: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Windows#Q6
Regards,
Aloke
On 9/20/13, johnmu...@aol.com johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having this same problem as described here:
Hi Aditya,
You need to start another 6 instances (9 instances in total) to
achieve this. The first 3 instances, as you mention, are already
assigned to the 3 shards. The next 3 will be become their replicas,
followed by the next 3 as the next replicas.
You could create two copies each of the
Hi Eric,
As Bryan suggests, you should look at appropriately setting up the
fragSize maxAnalyzedChars for long documents.
One issue I find with your search request is that in trying to
highlight across three separate fields, you have added each of them as
a separate request param:
Hi Deepak,
As Hoss explains it, there wouldn't be any effect of changing the order of
individual search terms.
In addition, you could look at the Scoring algo:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/scoring.html#Algorithm,
Hi,
Please refer to my response from a few months back:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201303.mbox/%3ccaht6s2az_w2av04rdmoeeck5e9o0k4ytktf0pjsecsh-lls...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Our modelling is to index N (individual pages) + 1 (original document) in
Solr. Once a document
Hi Rob,
I think the wrong Content-type header is getting passed. Try one of these
instead:
curl '
http://localhost:8983/solr/update/csv?commit=trueseparator=%09stream.file=/tmp/sample.tmp
'
OR
curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/update/csv?commit=trueseparator=%09' -H
Hi,
Facet by one of the duplicate fields (probably by the numeric field that
you mentioned) and set facet.mincount=2.
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Ali, Saqib docbook@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
We have documents that are duplicates i.e. the ID is different, but rest of
PM, Aloke Ghoshal alghos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Facet by one of the duplicate fields (probably by the numeric field that
you mentioned) and set facet.mincount=2.
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Ali, Saqib docbook@gmail.com
wrote:
hello,
We have
Hi,
Since your data is well delimited, I'd suggest using CSV Updater, with the
delimiter/ separator set to: *'~*'
See: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV#separator
Looks like you might also have to additionally split based on your second
delimiter: *';'*
See:
Hi Vicky,
Please check you if you have a second multiValued field by the name
content defined in your schema.xml. It is typically part of the default
schema definition is different from the one you had initially posted had
Content with a capital C.
Here's the debugQuery on my system (with both
Here you go, it is the default 4.2.1 schema.xml (
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_2_1/solr/example/solr/solr.xml),
with the following additions:
!-- Added these fields --
field name=Content type=text_general indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=false/
field
Location of the schema.xml:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_2_1/solr/example/solr/collection1/conf/schema.xml
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Aloke Ghoshal alghos...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you go, it is the default 4.2.1 schema.xml (
http://svn.apache.org/repos
Hi,
Based on your WhitespaceTokenizerFactory due to the
LowerCaseFilterFactory the words actually indexed are:
speed, post, speedpost
You should get results for: q:Content:speedpost
So either remove the LowerCaseFilterFactory or add the
LowerCaseFilterFactory to as a query time Analyzer as
Hi,
That's correct the Analyzers will get applied to both Index Query time.
In fact I do get results back for speedPost with this field definition.
Regards,
Aloke
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:21 PM, vicky desai vicky.de...@germinait.comwrote:
Hi,
Another Example I found is q=Content:wi-fi
Should work once you set up both fields as multiValued (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Common_field_options).
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Utkarsh Sengar utkarsh2...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to load a list in a solr filed and query for items in that
list?
Hi,
I would suggest boosting over sorting. Something along:
radius:[0 TO 10]^100 OR radius:[10 TO *]
Regards,
Aloke
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Raymond Wiker rwi...@gmail.com wrote:
It will probably have better performance than having a plan b query that
executes if the first query
Compare timings in the following cases:
- Without the wildcard
- With suffix wild card only - test*
- With reverse wild card filter factory and two separate terms - *test OR
test*
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:15 PM, meena.sri...@mathworks.com
meena.sri...@mathworks.com wrote:
Index size is around
Does adding facet.mincount=2 help?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
To search for duplicate IDs, I am running the following query:
select?q=*:*facet=truefacet.field=idrows=0
However, since upgrading from Solr 4.1 to Solr 4.3 I am receiving
Hi Floyd,
We use SolrNet to connect to Solr from a C# application. Since SolrNet is
not aware about SolrCloud or ZK, we use a Http load balancer in front of
the Solr nodes query via the load balancer url. You could use something
like HAProxy or Apache reverse proxy for load balancing.
On the
One option could be to get the clusterstate.json via the following Solr url
figure out the leader from the response json:
*
http://server:port/solr/zookeeper?detail=truepath=%2Fclusterstate.json*
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM, vicky desai vicky.de...@germinait.comwrote:
Hi,
I have a
Hi Simon,
Good that it works.
The reason as far as I could make out is that by itself/ standalone the
SpellCheckComponent (used by the suggester) is not distributed. One way to
explicitly distribute the search is to provide the shards:
Hi,
Check the obvious first, that you have rebuilt reloaded the suggest
dictionary individually on all nodes. Also the other checks here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6653186/solr-suggester-not-returning-any-results
Then, try with one of query component OR distrib=false setting:
Thanks Barani. Could also work out this way provided we start with a large
set of suggestions initially to increase the likelihood of getting some
matches when filtering down with the second query.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:51 PM, bbarani bbar...@gmail.com wrote:
I would suggest you to take
to the right field.
Obviously this will get out of hand if you have too many of these...so
this has limits.
Jason
On Jun 11, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Aloke Ghoshal alghos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Trying to find a way to filter down the suggested terms set based on the
term value of another
(EdgeNGram) behavior to get the right suggestion data back.
I would suggest an additional core to accomplish this (fed via
replication) to avoid cache entry collision with your normal queries.
Hope that's useful to you.
Jason
On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Aloke Ghoshal alghos...@gmail.com wrote
Hi,
Trying to find a way to filter down the suggested terms set based on the
term value of another indexed field?
Let's say we have the following documents indexed in Solr:
userid:1, groupid:1, content:alpha beta gamma
userid:2, groupid:1, content:alternate better garden
userid:3, groupid:2,
True, the container's request header size limit must be the reason then.
Try:
http://serverfault.com/questions/136249/how-do-we-increase-the-maximum-allowed-http-get-query-length-in-jetty
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
Maybe it is hitting some
Hi Kamal,
You might have to increase the value of maxBooleanClauses in solrconfig.xml
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml). The default value 1024 should
have been fine for 280 search terms.
Though not relevant to your query (OR query) take a look at for an
explanation:
Hi,
A work around could be to add columns from the second table as fields to
the Solr document from the first table. E.g. For DB query:
SELECT project_id
FROM projects
MINUS
SELECT project_id
FROM archived_project;
Add archived_projects as a boolean field to Projects in Solr then query
as:
Hi,
We are going about solving this problem by splitting a N-page document in
to N separate documents (one per page, type=Page) + 1 additional combined
document (that has all the pages, type=Combined). All the N+1 documents
have the same doc_id.
The search is initially performed against the
Hi,
If you haven't already, please refer to:
http://www.ngdata.com/site/blog/57-ng.html
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-cloud-concepts-td3726292.html
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#FAQ
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Marcin,
Since you are thinking of this in the context of Amazon, I would suggest
taking a different route. Assign an Elastic IP (EIP) to each EC2 instance
running the ZK node use the EIP in Solr. This way you could easily map
the EIP to a new EC2 instance subsequently, if required, and the
Hi Tom,
This is great. Should make it to the documentations.
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Burgmans, Tom
tom.burgm...@wolterskluwer.com wrote:
I am also busy with getting this clear. Here are my notes so far (by
copying and writing myself):
queryWeight = the impact
Hi Robert,
You could look at pageDoc pageScore to improve things for deep paging (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#pageDoc_and_pageScore).
Regards,
Aloke
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Yes, expected.
When it does a search for the first,
Hi,
Looking for feedback on running Solr Core/ Tika parsing engine on Azure.
There's one offering for Solr within Azure from Lucid works. This offering
however doesn't mention Tika.
We are looking at options to make content from files (doc, excel, pdfs,
etc.) stored within Azure storage
project boostraps itself with all of the Java and Solr files it
needs to run and starts Solr using bundled in Jetty web server, so as long
as you have Tika in your libs and a configured handler you should be able
to use it.
Radek.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Aloke Ghoshal alghos...@gmail.com
44 matches
Mail list logo
