Hello Otis,
I have been looking for something similar for Jackrabbit's lucene index,
but I still have some uncertainty about wether I understand correctly
what the patches in SOLR-139 supply:
Do they just retrieve formerly stored fields of a lucene Document,
change some field, and then analyze
Hello,
your problem stems ( :-) ) from stemming. You can search this list, and
probably will find many threads. Last week somebody had the same
question, see archive of last week,
Regards Ard
Hi All,
From past 6 months i am working and using SOLR. Now i am
facing some problem with
I have a text field type called courseTitle and it contains
Struts 2
If I search courseTitle:strut* I get the documents but if I search
with
courseTitle:struts* I do not get any results.
Could you please explain why?
Just a guess: It might be because of stemming. Do you
Hello,
Recently someone mentioned that it would be possible to have a 'replace
existing document' feature rather than just dropping and adding documents
with the same unique id.
AFAIK, this is not possible. You have the update in lucene, but internally it
just does a delete/add operation
We
Hello,
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 00:30 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Is it possible to get the values from the ValueSource (or from
: getFieldCacheCounts) sorted by its natural order (from lowest to
: highest values)?
well, an inverted term index is already a data structure
listing
We do pagination in XSL 1.0 often -- direct from a solr response
right to HTML/CSS/JS.
You get both the start and total rows from the solr response, so I
don't know what else you'd need.
I have been using similar xsls like you describe below in the past, butI
think after 3 years of
In general, the type of feature you are interested in is
typcially caleld
a PrefixQuery you can acomplish it with the SolrQueryParser
using a*
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
: example show all docs starting with an a or A, I would
just add an
: extra field only
I don't know if there is one, but if you need this kind of search to for
example show all docs starting with an a or A, I would just add an extra
field only containing the first letter. This is *much* faster in lucene, and
for many documents you don't risk the too many boolean clauses (though
Hello,
Brievly, what I'm looking for is a query that launch
something like this:
Giving the user search expression
A B C D
Generated Lucene query :
(myfield:I OR myfield:J OR myfield:O OR myfield:K)
if someone knows a way to reach this goal, please tell me how, i'm
actually
Hello,
but honestly i haven't relaly tried anything like this ...
the code for
parsing the synonyms.txt file probaly splits the individual
synonyms on
whitespace to prodce multiple tokens which might screw you up
... you may
need to get creative (perhaps use a PatternReplaceFilter to
Hello Daniel,
it sounds strange to me because in SolrCore you can find in initIndex() that
locks are removed at initialisation
Regards Ard
Hi
I'm developing a search application using SOLR/Lucene and I
think I found a
bug.
I was trying to index more documents and the total
Hello,
When I had those kind of problems (less complex) with lucene,
the only
idea was to filter from the front-end, according to the ACL policy.
Lucene docs and fields weren't protected, but tagged. Searching was
always applied with a field audience, with hierarchical values like
Hello,
Given the requirement to break down a document into separately
controlled pieces, I'd create a servlet that fronts the Solr
servlet and handles this conversion. I could think of ways to do it
using Solr, but they feel like unnatural acts.
As a general comment on ACLs, one
Hello,
Hi
And about the fields, if they are/aren't going to be present on the
responses based on the user group, you can do it in many
different ways
(using XML transformation to remove the undesirable fields,
implementing
your own RequestHandler able to process your group
Hello,
is it possible to configure solr to store the document URI in the lucene index
(the URI is not an xml field, but just the document's location)? Or is
everybody used to storing the contents of a document in the lucene index
(doesn't this imply a much larger index though?), so instead of
some directory with xml files,
Regards Ard Schrijvers
Yes. Set the field to be store and non-indexed, field type string
is what I use.
Or is everybody used to storing the contents of a document in the
lucene index (doesn't this imply a much larger index though?), so
instead
value when adding documents.
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Ard Schrijvers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:02:25 AM
Hello Nate,
IMHO, you will not be able to do this in solr unless you accept pretty hard
constraints on your ACLs (I will get back to this in a moment). IMO, it is not
possible to index documents along with ACLs. ACLs can be very fine grained, and
the thing you describe, ACL specific parts of a
Thanks Yonik and Walter,
putting it that way, it does make good sense to not store the transient xml
file which it is most of the usecases (I was thinking differently because I do
have xml files on file system or over http, like from a webdav call)
Anyway, thx for all answers, and again, sry
Excuse me, I meant solr ofcourse :-)
For these reasons, I do not think you can achieve with solar
20 matches
Mail list logo
