RE: Highlight question
Thanks a lot for your answer, I'm going to test and I will reply. Bertrand Ensdorf Ken wrote: Add the following parameters to the url: hl=truehl.fl=xhtml http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters -Original Message- From: Bertrand DUMAS-PILHOU [mailto:bdum...@eurocortex.fr] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:43 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Highlight question Hi everybody, I have an schema seems like this in SOLR: title, type:string , indexed not stored body, type:string, stemmed, indexed not stored xhtml, type:string, not indexed, stored When user make an search on field title, body or both, I want to highlight the match string in the xhtml field only. How I can do this ? Thanks and sorry for my english. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Highlight-question- tp23175851p23175851.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Highlight-question-tp23175851p23198244.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
modify SOLR scoring
Hi everybody, I'm using SOLR with a schema (for example) like this: parutiondate, date, indexed, not stored fulltext, stemmed, indexed, not stored I know it's possible to order by a field or more, but I want to order by score and modify the scrore formula. I'll want keep the SOLR score but add a new parameter in the formula to boost the score of the most recent document. What is the best way to do this ? Thanks. Excuse for my english. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/modify-SOLR-scoring-tp23198326p23198326.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Highlight question
Hi everybody, I have an schema seems like this in SOLR: title, type:string , indexed not stored body, type:string, stemmed, indexed not stored xhtml, type:string, not indexed, stored When user make an search on field title, body or both, I want to highlight the match string in the xhtml field only. How I can do this ? Thanks and sorry for my english. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Highlight-question-tp23175851p23175851.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Stemmer vs. exact match
Hi, I have the same reflexion actually. If you add an another field for exact search, and the end cannot type a search like : convertible +house Because in this sample, for 'convertible' the user want an exact search but not for 'house'. And I don't want to develop an new parser for query. I think, the solution is to add something in the stemmer analyser to store exact word too, and a parser that don't stem expression in quote. Is it a possible way ? Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote: On Dec 4, 2008, at 8:19 PM, Jonathan Ariel wrote: Hi! I'm wondering what solr is really doing with the exact word vs. the stemmed word. So for example I have 2 documents. The first one has in the title the word convertible The second one has convert When solr stem the titles, both will be the same since convertible - convert. Then when I search convertible both documents seems to have the same relevancy... is that right or Solr keeps track of the original word and gives extra score to the fact that I am actually looking for the same exact word that I have in a document... I might be wrong, but it seems to me that it should score that better. Solr doesn't keep track of the original word, unless you tell it to. So, if you are stemming, then you are losing the original word. A common way to solve what you are doing is to actually have two fields, where one is stemmed and one is exact (you can do this with the copyField/ mechanism in the Schema). Thus, if you want exact match, you search the exact match field, otherwise you search the stemmed field. -Grant -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stemmer-vs.-exact-match-tp20846069p20885740.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
