Any help on this is much appreciated. I cannot find any documentation
around this and would be good to understand what this means
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core
Thanks, Shawn.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 4/10/2014 2:50 PM, Chris W wrote:
Hi there
I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core
from
solr using (localhost:8000/solr/admin/cores?action=STATUScore=core)
and
i get
Hi there
I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core from
solr using (localhost:8000/solr/admin/cores?action=STATUScore=core) and
i get the following output
int name=numDocs100/int
int name=maxDoc102/int
int name=deletedDocs2/int
long name=version20527/long
int
What is the role of an overseer in solrcloud? The documentation does not
offer full details about it. What if an overseer node goes down?
--
Best
--
C
Silva ferm...@olx.com wrote:
Hi,
that's what I'm trying. I'm however really cautious when it comes to a
while (somethingIsTrue) { doSomething; sleep; }
Is that safe? What if the slave hungs up, the network is slow/fails, etc?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Chris W chris1980
Hi
You can use the details command to check the status of replication.
http://localhost:8983/solr/core_name/replication?command=details
The command returns an xml output and look out for the isReplicating
field in the output. Keep running the command in a loop until the flag
becomes false.
(7)
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the piecemeal approach but had another question. I have a 3 zk
ensemble. Does making 2 zk as observer roles help speed up bootup of solr
(due to decrease in time it takes to decide leaders for shards
Thanks Tim. I would definitely try that next time. I have seen a few
instances where the overseer_queue not getting processed but that looks
like an existing bug which got fixed in 4.6 (overseer doesnt process
requests when reload collection fails)
One question: Assuming our cluster can tolerate
Sorry for the piecemeal approach but had another question. I have a 3 zk
ensemble. Does making 2 zk as observer roles help speed up bootup of solr
(due to decrease in time it takes to decide leaders for shards)?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
Hi there
Is there a limit on the # of collections solrcloud can support? Can
zk/solrcloud handle 1000s of collections?
Also i see that the bootup time of solrcloud increases with increase in #
of cores. I do not have any expensive warm up queries. How do i speedup
solr startup?
--
Best
--
C
can't do much about 1 right now I think. For #2, you can keep your
transaction logs smaller by a hard commit before shutdown. For #3
there is a leaderVoteWait settings but I'd rather not touch that
unless it becomes a problem.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com
a bazillion replicas in aggregate.
Hours is surprising.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks, Shalin. Making clusterstate.json on a collection basis sounds
awesome.
I am not having problems with #2 . #3 is a major
. I was mistaken.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Shawn and Shalin
How does the frequency of commit affect zookeeper?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
SolrCloud
I am running a 3 node zookeeper 3.4.5 Quorum. I am running into issues
with Zookeeper transaction logs
[myid:2] - ERROR [main:QuorumPeer@453] - Unable to load database on disk
java.io.IOException: Unreasonable length = 1048587
at
and during
collection API commands. It doesn't correlate directly with indexing
but is correlated with how frequently you call commit.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 3/18/2014 5:46 PM, Chris W wrote:
I am running a 3 node zookeeper 3.4.5 Quorum. I am
Can you share a sample query ? Ensure you have filterquery, fl fields and
query result cache settings well tuned
To give you an example: A month ago I had an issue where a few of our
queries were taking 3+seconds with 5 shards and as I added more shards the
query was taking even longer. I figured
Any help on this is much appreciated. Is it better to use more cores for
zookeeper (as opposed to 1 core machine)?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Furkan
Load on the network is very low when read workload is on the cluster.
During indexing, a few
We decided to go with the latest (it seems to have a lot more bug
/performance fixes). The issue i mentioned was a red herring. I was able to
successfully upgrade
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
Moving 4 versions ahead may need much additional tests
Hi
I have a 3 node zk ensemble . I see a very high latency for zk responses
and also a lot of outstanding requests (in the order of 30-40)
I also see that the requests are not going to all zookeeper nodes equally.
One node has more requests/connections than the others. I see that CPU/Mem
and
architecture)
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-03-13 0:57 GMT+02:00 Chris W chris1980@gmail.com:
Hi
I have a 3 node zk ensemble . I see a very high latency for zk
responses
and also a lot of outstanding requests (in the order of 30-40)
I also see that the requests are not going to all
I am running solrcloud version 4.3.0 with a 10 m1.xlarge nodes and using
zk to manage the state/data for collections and configs.I want to upgrade
to version 4.4.0.
When i deploy a 4.4 version of solrcloud in my test environment, none of
the collections/configs (created using the 4.3 version of
understand vetting requirements, but I thought I'd ask No use
going through this twice if you can avoid it.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
I am running solrcloud version 4.3.0 with a 10 m1.xlarge nodes and using
zk to manage the state/data
22 matches
Mail list logo
