Hi there,
Unfortunately I don' t agree with Shawn when he suggest to update
server.xml configuration up to 1 in maxThreads. If Tomcat (due to the
concurrent overload you' re suffering, the type of the queries you' re
handling, etc.) cannot manage the requested queries what could happen is
Ehem, *_target --- *_facet.
2015-05-14 16:47 GMT+02:00 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com:
Hi Yonik,
Yes, they are the target from copyFields in the schema.xml. This *_target
fields are suposed to be used in some specific searchable (thus, tokenized)
fields that in the future
.
-Yonik
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I have the following dynamicFields definition in my schema.xml:
!-- I18n DynamicFields --
dynamicField name=i18n* type=string indexed=true stored=true /
!--
DynamicFields used
at 12:49 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you don' t mark as stored a field indexed and 'facetable', I was
expecting to not be able to return their values, so faceting has no
sense.
Faceting does not use or retrieve stored field values. The labels
faceting returns
- Multivalued: *_facet are multivalued.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa
2015-05-14 18:32 GMT+02:00 Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Yonik,
Yes, they are the target from copyFields in the schema.xml. This *_target
fields
Hi there,
I have the following dynamicFields definition in my schema.xml:
!-- I18n DynamicFields --
dynamicField name=i18n* type=string indexed=true stored=true / !--
DynamicFields used typically for faceting issues by copying values from
other existing fields-- dynamicField name=*_facet
Hey guys,
I've doing some tests sharing the same index between three Solr servers:
*SolrA*: is allowed to both read and index. The index is stored in a NFS.
It has its own configuration files.
*SolrB and SolrC*: they can only read from the shared index and each one
has their own configuration
or
FSDirectoyReader) that always read the current segments when a commit
happens?
2014-03-12 11:35 GMT+01:00 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com:
Hey guys,
I've doing some tests sharing the same index between three Solr servers:
*SolrA*: is allowed to both read and index. The index is stored
?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
2014-03-12 12:10 GMT+01:00 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com:
I've seen that StandardDirectoryReader appears in the commit logs. Maybe
this DirectoryReader type is caching somehow the old segments in SolrB and
SolrC even if they have been commited previosly
Hi Chris,
Thank you very much for your response! It was very instructive. I knew some
performance tips to improve search and I configured a very low merge factor
(mergeFactor2/mergeFactor) to boost search operations instead of
indexation ones. I haven't got a deep knowledge of internal Lucene
was about optimizing at much as possible search speed
thanks to optimizing, mergeFactor tunning, caches setup, etc.
Thanks a lot!
2014-02-06 Toke Eskildsen t...@statsbiblioteket.dk:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:22 +0100, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
I knew some performance tips to improve search and I
Hello!
I've got an scenario where I index very frequently on master servers and
replicate to slave servers with one minute polling. Master indexes are
growing fast and I would like to optimize indexes to improve search
queries. However...
1. During an optimize operation, can master servers index
Hello!
I've installed a classical two shards Solr 4.5 topology without SolrCloud
balancing with an HA proxy. I've got a *copyField* like this:
* field name=tagValues type=string indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=false/*
Copied from this one:
* field name=tags type=searchableTextTokenized
Hello!
Checkout also your application server logs. Maybe you're trying to index
Documents with any syntax error and they are skipped.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa
2013/11/26 Alejandro Marqués Rodríguez amarq...@paradigmatecnologico.com
Hi,
In lucene you are supossed to be able to index up to 274
Hi guys!
I have a master-slave replication (Solr 4.1 version) with a 30 seconds
polling interval and continuously new documents are indexed, so after 30
seconds always new data must be replicated. My test index is not huge: just
5M documents.
I have experimented that a simple q=*:* query appears
Against -- again, :-)
2013/11/5 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hi guys!
I have a master-slave replication (Solr 4.1 version) with a 30 seconds
polling interval and continuously new documents are indexed, so after 30
seconds always new data must be replicated. My test index
Any idea?
2013/10/23 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
More info:
When executing the Query to a single Solr server it works:
http://solr1:8080/events/data/suggest?q=mwt=jsonhttp://solrclusterd.buguroo.dev:8080/events/data/suggest?q=mwt=json
{
- responseHeader
-4311
-Original Message-
From: Luis Cappa Banda [mailto:luisca...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 6:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck with Distributed Search (sharding).
Any idea?
2013/10/23 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
More info
Hello!
I'be been trying to enable Spellchecking using sharding following the steps
from the Wiki, but I failed, :-( What I do is:
*Solrconfig.xml*
*searchComponent name=suggest* class=solr.SpellCheckComponent
lst name=spellchecker
str name=namesuggest/str
str
=/suggestwt=jsonq=*:*
2013/10/23 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello!
I'be been trying to enable Spellchecking using sharding following the
steps from the Wiki, but I failed, :-( What I do is:
*Solrconfig.xml*
*searchComponent name=suggest* class=solr.SpellCheckComponent
lst name
Is distributed MLT officially released or you are using a patch?
El martes, 20 de agosto de 2013, Shawn Heisey escribió:
Before I file an issue on this, I wanted to bring it up here, so I can see
if there's something I'm overlooking.
Distributed MLT is very very slow for me. I can make it
Hello guys,
Since I upgrade from 4.1.0 to 4.4.0 version I've noticed that
EmbeddedSolrServer has changed a little the way of construction:
*Solr 4.1.0 style:*
CoreContainer coreContainer = new CoreContainer(*solrHome, new
File(solrHome+/solr.xml*));
EmbeddedSolrServer localSolrServer = new
something in CHANGES.txt to point this out...
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
On 31 Jul 2013, at 08:53, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
Hello guys,
Since I upgrade from 4.1.0 to 4.4.0 version I've noticed that
EmbeddedSolrServer has changed a little the way of construction:
*Solr 4.1.0 style
the wheel?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Luis Cappa Banda
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Email regular expression.
Hello everyone!
Unfortunately I have to search all E-mail addresses found in a text field
from each
like it, to be honest,
Regards,
2013/7/30 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, Jack, Steve,
Thank you for your answers. I´ve never used UAX29URLEmailTokenizerFactory,
but I´ve read about it before trying RegExp´s queries. As far as I know,
UAX29URLEmailTokenizerFactory
allows
I´ve tried this kind of queries in the past but I detected that they have a
poor performance and that they are incredibly slow. But it´s just my
experience, maybe someone can share with us any other opinion.
2013/7/30 Raymond Wiker rwi...@gmail.com
On Jul 30, 2013, at 22:05 , Luis Cappa Banda
Hey, David,
I´ve been reading the thread and I think that is one of the most educative
mail-threads I´ve read in Solr mailing list. Just for curiosity: internally
for Solr, is it the same a query like field:* and field:[* TO *]? I
think that it´s expected to receive the same number of numFound
On 7/30/13 4:44 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, David,
I´ve been reading the thread and I think that is one of the most educative
mail-threads I´ve read in Solr mailing list. Just for curiosity:
internally
for Solr, is it the same a query like field:* and field
unique key to
appear in the index, even in different shards?
Isn't it a bug by definition?
What am I missing here?
Thanks,
Val
On 05/23/2013 09:55 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/23/2013 1:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
I've query each Solr shard server one by one and the total
anyone
experienced the same?
Best regards,
- Luis Cappa
2013/5/27 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hi, Erick!
That's it! I'm using a custom implementation of a SolrServer with
distributed behavior that routes queries and updates using an in-house
Round Robin method. But the thing
On 5/23/2013 1:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
I've query each Solr shard server one by one and the total number of
documents is correct. However, when I change rows parameter from 10 to
100
the total numFound of documents change:
I've seen this problem on the list before and the cause has
Hello, guys!
I'm running Solr 4.3.0 and I've notice an strange behavior during
distributed queries execution. Currently I have three Solr servers as
shards and I when I do the following query...
http://localhost:11080/twitter/data/select?q=*:**rows=10*
-sockets-to-fetch-a-webpage-with-java
But, that's a trivial case. You might have something else in mind.
Jack
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/14/2013 3:13 AM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
I know that, but I was wondering if it exists another way just
Hello, guys!
I would like to do something like this. Let's suppose we have:
*
*
*(...) *
*
*
*String query = q=*:*start=0rows=20sort=date%20desc;*
*
*
*SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery();*
*solrQuery.setQuery(query);*
*
*
*server.query(solrQuery);*
*
*
*(...)*
I tried that and it fails. My
about SolrQuery.
2013/5/14 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, guys!
I would like to do something like this. Let's suppose we have:
*
*
*(...) *
*
*
*String query = q=*:*start=0rows=20sort=date%20desc;*
*
*
*SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery
is just the result of calling toString() on the
HashMap).
Upayavira
On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
I know that, but I was wondering if it exists another way just to set the
complete query (including q, fq, sort, etc.) embedded in a SolrQuery
object
as the same
request use the
complete query string.
2013/5/14 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
I know that, but I was wondering if it exists another way just to set the
complete query (including q, fq, sort, etc.) embedded in a SolrQuery
object
as the same way that you query using some kind
object? I think it's
much easier to parse a json format response to you business object.
2013/5/14 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Yeah, unfortunately that's what I'm doing right now, but parsing the
resultant String from the HttpClient response into a QueryResponse seems
Is it possible to index plain String JSON documents using SolrJ? I already
know annotating POJOs works fine, but I need a more flexible way to index
data without any intermediate POJO.
That's because when changing, adding or removing new fields I don't want to
change continously that POJO again
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Luis Cappa Banda
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 10:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Quick question about indexing with SolrJ.
Is it possible to index plain String JSON documents using SolrJ? I already
know annotating POJOs
Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyone can help me? Each response
PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
And up! :-)
I´ve been wondering if using CloudSolrServer has something to do here.
Does
it have a bad performance when a CloudSolrServer singletong receives
multiple queries? Is it recommended to have a CloudSolrServer instances
list
/14 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello!
Thanks a lot, Erick! I've attached some stack traces during a normal
'engine' running.
Cheers,
- Luis Cappa
2013/3/13 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
Stack traces..
First,
jps -l
that will give you a the process IDs of your
PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
wrote:
You def have to use multiple threads with it for it to be fast, but 3 or
4 docs a second still sounds absurdly slow.
- Mark
On Mar 15, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
And up! :-)
I´ve been wondering
above
Usually I pipe the output from jstack into a text file...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Uhm, how can I do that... 'cleanly'? I know that with JConsole it´s
posible
to output this traces, but with a .war application built
Hello, guys!
I´ve been experiencing some annoying behavior with my current production
scenario. Here is the snapshot:
- SolrCloud: 2 shards
- Zookeeper ensemble: 3 nodes in *different machines *(most of the
tutorials installs 3 Zookeeper nodes in the same machine).
- This is the
queries directly into Solr.
Thanks!
- Luis Cappa
2013/3/13 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, guys!
I´ve been experiencing some annoying behavior with my current production
scenario. Here is the snapshot:
- SolrCloud: 2 shards
- Zookeeper ensemble: 3 nodes in *different
you very much, Mark.
- Luis Cappa
And
2013/3/13 Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Could you capture some thread stack traces in the 'engine' and see if
there are any blocking methods?
- Mark
On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote:
Just one correction
Hey, David.
How are you? I did what you suggested and now works fine. However I hope
that those performance issues will be resolved soon and I hope I could help
some way: coding, testing, whatever. About cache warm up, I have setted up
some warm-up queries in solrconfig.xml that fills the cache.
is the field fieldtype for geolocation
2) can you try changing your query to q={!func}geodist() to verify
that
the function works at all?
: Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:30:33 +0100
: From: Luis Cappa Banda lt;
luiscappa@
gt;
: Reply-To:
solr-user@.apache
that
the function works at all?
: Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:30:33 +0100
: From: Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: Solr 4.1: problems with Spatial Search.
:
: Without the sort it works perfectly
for geolocation
2) can you try changing your query to q={!func}geodist() to verify
that
the function works at all?
: Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:30:33 +0100
: From: Luis Cappa Banda lt;
luiscappa@
gt;
: Reply-To:
solr-user@.apache
: To:
solr-user@.apache
: Subject: Re: Solr
) what is the field fieldtype for geolocation
2) can you try changing your query to q={!func}geodist() to verify
that
the function works at all?
: Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:30:33 +0100
: From: Luis Cappa Banda lt;
luiscappa@
gt;
: Reply-To:
solr-user@.apache
: To:
solr
Without the sort it works perfectly, and there are no more error messages,
just the one I copypasted, :-(
El 05/03/2013 19:05, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) dsmi...@mitre.org
escribió:
Hmm; weird. It looks right. Does it work without the sort? -- i.e. does
the
filter work? Are there more
/30 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, guys.
After upgrading from Solr 4.1 to Solr 4.1 the following error has
frecuently appeared in my logs.
*INFO: A cluster state change: WatchedEvent state:SyncConnected
type:NodeDataChanged path:/clusterstate.json, has occurred - updating
Hello!
I haven´t found Solr 4.1 maven artifacts to update my Solr projects
dependencies. Are they published in the public Mvn repositories?
Thank you!
Any release stimation date, Mark? I heard something about January. I was
considering using 4.0 for production but if 4.1 release is incomming I
could wait a little more.
2013/1/4 Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
CloudSolrServer can be used for indexing and is smart about indexing since
it
Any idea about when Solr 4.1 will be released?
2012/12/18 Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Hi,
If you are not in a rush, I'd wait for Solr 4.1. Not that Solr 4.0 is not
usable, but Solr 4.1 will have a ton of fixes.
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring -
in node.js
* use GWT to compile CloudSolrServer to javascript (I would imagine it
will be hard to make it work though)
Regards, Per Steffensen
Luis Cappa Banda skrev:
Hello!
I've always used Java as the backend language to program search modules,
and I know that CloudSolrServer
JSON format. Do you know how to get it status? Any request handler or Solr
query? Maybe checking directly from Zookeeper?
Best regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/12/15 Per Steffensen st...@designware.dk
Luis Cappa Banda skrev:
Do you know if SolrCloud replica shards have 100% the same data
it with the new
state.
A dumb client won't be able to optimize some updates to leaders.
It's still a perfectly reasonable option to not use a 'smart' client
though.
- Mark
On Dec 14, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I've always used Java as the backend
Hello everyone.
I have developed and stand alone WebApp with a custom API that dispatches
queries to SolrCloud using CloudSolrServer implementation to do that. I´m
testing with a single Zookeeper instance installed in an Amazon instance.
Solr servers are deployed in two Amazon instances and I
to
load, network lag, or garbage collection pauses. Some environments might
need to go as high as 30-60 seconds.
Any suggestion or recommendation? What about increasing tickTime to 10
seconds with zkClientTimeout = 30 seconds?
2012/12/12 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello everyone
Hello, guys.
Does anyone tested the latest
SOLR-788https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788 MLT
patch with Solr 4.0? It´s a very important Sorl feature that I would like
to have in a SolrCloud environment. I use Eclipse as IDE, and I´m
familiarized with Maven so it looks like I´ll spend
I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag but it exists a conflict
with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in ShardRequest.java.
The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips?
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, guys.
Does anyone tested
Hello, guys.
How are you? MoreLikeThis doesn´t support Distributed searchs, so I think
that I could emulate a similar behaviour with eDismax features. What I´ll
like to do is:
*1. *I have two fields that contains important information from the
document. This two fields will be used to relate
Erratum: at the end of the previous mail I meant that Edismax *isn´t *as
quick as desired, :-)
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
- Edismax is as quick as desired. I finally I bet for that solution, I
would like to improve performance. Again I´m opened
and setting a
new constant to Solr code sounds a little bit, errr... unsafe, :-P
I´ll try tomorrow.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/27 Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Add it?
- Mark
On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote:
I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag
Cappa.
2012/11/22 Luis Cappa Banda lt;
luiscappa@
gt;
For more details, my indexation App is:
1. Multithreaded.
2. NRT indexation.
3. It´s a Web App with a REST API. It receives asynchronous requests
that
produces those atomic updates / document reindexations I told before
Hello.
You can query by *:* with start=0, rows=1, fl=contentid and sorting by
contentid. Get the bigger/smaller value for that field is from the first
(and only) document returned.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
El 24/11/2012 14:45, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com escribió:
The stats
Hello,
I´ve been dealing with the same question these days. In architecture terms,
it´s always better to separate services (Solr and Zookeeper, in this case)
rather to keep them in a single instance. However, when we have to deal
with costs issues, all of use we are quite limitated and we must
Hello, Joe.
Try something like this using SolrJ library:
String endpoints[] = // your Solr server endpoints. Example:
http://localhost:8080/solr/core1
String zookeeperEndpoints = // your Zookeeper endpoints. Example:
localhost:9000
String collectionName = // Your collection name. Example: core1
Hello,
As far as I know, you cannot do that at the moment, :-/
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/22 joe.cohe...@gmail.com joe.cohe...@gmail.com
Thanks Rakudten.
I had my question mis-phrased.
What I need is being able to get the solr servers storing a collection by
giving the zookeeper
Hello everyone.
I´ve starting to seriously worry about with SolrCloud due an strange
behavior that I have detected. The situation is this the following:
*1.* SolrCloud with one shard and two Solr instances.
*2.* Indexation via SolrJ with CloudServer and a custom
BinaryLBHttpSolrServer that uses
though you were able to work around the
bug in the client solr still uses the xml format internally so the atomic
update (with multivalued field) fails later down the stack. The bug you
filed needs to be fixed to get the problem solved.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca
: the leader might have the doc right and the
replica not.
I only briefly looked at the bits that deal with this so perhaps there's
something more involved.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, Sami!
But isn´t strange that some documents were
and
with the fact that maybe you are trying to modify the index while an index
update is in course.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/22 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello!
I´m using a simple test configuration with nShards=1 without any replica.
SolrCloudServer is suposed to forward
the document wasn´t updated. Bad news... it smells
like a critical bug.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/22 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
For more details, my indexation App is:
1. Multithreaded.
2. NRT indexation.
3. It´s a Web App with a REST API. It receives asynchronous requests
Hello,
Do not forget to increase maxBooleanClauses.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/21 uwe72 uwe.clem...@exxcellent.de
i am using tomcat
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pls-help-Very-long-query-what-to-do-tp4021606p4021620.html
Sent from the Solr -
Hello!
I suggest you to try PatternTokenizer with a regex that includes . and
blank spaces, for example, in Query and Index analyzers for that fieldType.
The expression will be tokenized by that regex expression and you will
success querying. Unfortunately, you will have to reindex all if you
(requestWriter);
return solrServer;
}
}
On 15 November 2012 16:43, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, my first attemp was with a ListString, but it didn´t work. Then I
started to try another ways such as a String[] array with no success.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa
Hello everyone,
I have developed a NRT Java app that indexes documents using a
CloudSolrServer instance. During my tests I have a SolrCloud composed by
only one shard and two Solr server instances. During the several tests I
did found just in one case the following error:
*
*
*12-11-20
Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have developed a NRT Java app that indexes documents using a
CloudSolrServer instance. During my tests I have a SolrCloud composed by
only one shard and two Solr server instances. During the several tests I
did found just in one
Hello!
When queries become more and more complex and you need to apply one second
query with the resultant docs from the first one, or re-sort results, or
maybe add some promotional or special docs to the response, I recommend to
develop a Web App module that implements that complex business
Hello everyone,
I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with atomic
updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work well.
Here is the snippet:
*SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
*doc.addField(id, myId);*
*
*
*MapString, ListString
[Value1,
Value2]. In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
operation to the ListSring. Is impossible to update atomically a
multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
operation?
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, Sami.
It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
Thanks,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thread update:
When I use
Ok, done:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4080
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, Sami.
It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
Thanks,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15
with the
xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request writers
behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
The Affects version should be 4.0.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello, Sami
*.
- I´m using Java jdk6.
Alternatives:
- I´m doing something wrong and I´m so stupid that I can´t see it, :-(
- The way I update fields is not the correct one.
- There is a general bug with atomic updates via SolrJ.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda luisca
, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, Sami.
Doing some tests I´ve used the same code as you and did a quick
execution:
*HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer(
http://localhost:8080/solrserver/core1
http://localhost:10080/newscover_es/items_es
Hello,
I´ve found what It seems to be a bug
JIRA-SOLR4080https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4080?focusedCommentId=13498055page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-13498055
with
CloudSolrServer during atomic updates via SolrJ. Thanks to Sami I
when you use that even without specifying reguest-/response writer.
--
Sami Siren
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I´ve found what It seems to be a bug
JIRA-SOLR4080
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4080?focusedCommentId
Hello!
I´ve got some encoding problems with my currently new analyzer
configuration. I´ve deployed a Solr server in Apache Tomcat setting
Tomcat´s encoding to UTF-8 in server.xml. Also Solr´s encoding is setted to
UTF-8 in schema.xml. I have defined a fieldType like the following:
*fieldType
!
2012/11/7 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello!
I´ve got some encoding problems with my currently new analyzer
configuration. I´ve deployed a Solr server in Apache Tomcat setting
Tomcat´s encoding to UTF-8 in server.xml. Also Solr´s encoding is setted to
UTF-8 in schema.xml. I have
Hello!
In my opinion, you are trying to use Solr as a complete and classic
database but the thing is that the best scenario where Solr rocks is just
for fast search data access. Thus, you just should index those data
candidate to be searched for. My personal suggestion is that you think
about how
Forward to solr-user mailing list. We forgot to reply to it, :-/
2012/11/5 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello, Mark!
I´ve been testing more and more and things are going better. I have tested
what you told me about -Dbootstrap_conf=true and works fine, but the
problem is that if I
team though!
brbrbr--- Original Message ---
On 11/5/2012 10:37 AM Luis Cappa Banda wrote:brThat´s the question, :-)
br
brRegards,
br
brLuis Cappa.
br
Hello,
In that case try again with a JSON array and check if:
1. The request arrives to Solr server. In that case, copypaste the log
traces here.
2. The request is never executed. Analyze with Firebug in your browser.
Regards,
Luis Cappa.
2012/11/2 amit amit.mal...@gmail.com
Hi Luis
markrmil...@gmail.com
A big difference if you are using tomcat is that you still need to
specify jetty.port - unless you change the name of that sys prop in
solr.xml.
Some more below:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello!
How are you?I
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
