to explore and learn the API via tab completion, which is of
course not so easy to offer via a C extension API :-/
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
[1] http://pooteeweet.org/blog/1796
(namespaces etc). btw there is
already another PHP 5.3 based API, though it tries to also unify other Lucene
based API's as much as possible:
https://github.com/dstendardi/Ariadne
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
website)
[] Maven repository (whether you use Maven, Ant+Ivy, Buildr, etc.)
[X] I/we build them from source via an SVN/Git checkout.
[] Other (someone in your company mirrors them internally or via a downstream
project)
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
with--curl-wrappers.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 19.12.2010, at 23:30, Alexey Serba wrote:
Also Ephraim proposed a really neat solution with GROUP_CONCAT, but
I'm not sure that all RDBMS-es support that.
Thats MySQL only syntax.
But if you google you can find similar solution for other RDBMS.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m
On 13.11.2010, at 10:30, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org
wrote:
The above wiki page seems to be out of date. Reading the comments in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 it seems like group should
be replaced
I
can sensibly bring in a stop word filter here? Actually in theory the stop
words could appear as the first or second word as well.
So I guess when producing shingle's I want to skip any stop word from being
part of any shingle.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
states of america. it would then generate a shingle with
united states america which in turn wouldnt generate a proper phrase search
string.
one option of course would be to restrict the shingles to 2 words and then
using the stop word filter would work as expected.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m
On 07.11.2010, at 20:13, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I am pondering making use of field collapsing. I am currently indexing
clauses (sections) inside UN documents:
http://resolutionfinder.org/search/unifiedResults?q=africa=t[22]=medicationdc=st=clause
Now since right now my data set
the right counts. So I am wondering if
field collapsing in its current form supports faceting, since its not mentioned
on the wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 14.10.2010, at 19:50, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I'm kind of confused about Solr development plans in general, highlighted by
this thread.
I think 1.4.1 is the latest officially stable release, yes?
Why is there both a 1.5 and a 3.x, anyway? Not to mention a 4.x?
however its Y. but no information means users are
essentially without any information about the future.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
tokenizing
lucene queries to enable validation of the syntax used etc.
see here for a use case and a user land implementation:
http://pooteeweet.org/blog/1796
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 20.09.2010, at 08:32, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
ok since it didnt seem like there was interest to document this approach on
the wiki i have simply documented it on my blog:
http://pooteeweet.org/blog/1827
sorry for the spam. Lance (and Erik) did think it would be good to add
Hi,
ok since it didnt seem like there was interest to document this approach on the
wiki i have simply documented it on my blog:
http://pooteeweet.org/blog/1827
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
split up your queries like that?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
out by any sane RDBMS.
And if clean = false it basically triggers the delta query part to be evaluated.
Is there any downside to this approach? Should this be added to the wiki?
regards.
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
be available.
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I think i have mentioned this approach before on this list, but I really
think that the deltaQuery approach which is currently explained as the way
to do updates is far from ideal. It seems to add a lot of redundant queries.
I therefore propose
as to whats going to happen in the near future would make it
all the more easier for us users to bet our futures on solr :)
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
park when to expect them would go a long
way.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 17.07.2010, at 15:39, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I am following:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LoggingInDefaultJettySetup
All works fine except defining the logging properties files from jetty.xml
Does this approach work for anyone else?
problem solved
i had to remove
Hi,
I am following:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LoggingInDefaultJettySetup
All works fine except defining the logging properties files from jetty.xml
Does this approach work for anyone else?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
/select?debugQuery=onq={!raw f=foo_s}
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
, and +/- can be used to denote mandatory
and optional clauses ... but all other Lucene query parser special characters
are escaped to simplify the user experience.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 29.06.2010, at 13:38, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 29.06.2010, at 13:24, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent wrote:
Hi,
In DisMax the mm parameter controls whether terms are required or
optional. The default is 100% which means all terms required, i.e. you do
not need to add +. You can change
search and boolean operators, if you need more
advanced user-facing query syntax.
yeah .. i am keeping an eye on that already.
thx!
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
security and council are still
highlighted separately.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 26.06.2010, at 16:22, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt get me the
desired result:
http
On 26.06.2010, at 16:30, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 26.06.2010, at 16:22, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt
to the 5.1.12
connector. I just saw the message on the list about branch_3x in SVN, which
looks like a better option than trunk.
Any news on this topic?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
the given fields to
stored?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
looked at. it doesnt really contain the
infos required, plus its obviously quite slow too.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
rather just remove support for
prohibiting words.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
)
... 12 more
Jun 13, 2010 4:13:47 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2 rollback
INFO: start rollback
Jun 13, 2010 4:13:47 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2 rollback
INFO: end_rollback
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
is there some clean solution that
doesnt mean a lot of coding work on my end to handle dash both as a special and
as a normal char.
something like doing the search twice both with the dash escaped and not
escaped and then some intelligent scoring to produce the final result set.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe
might end up doing though is not escape dashes only in specific cases:
foo-bar (escape)
foo - bar (escape)
foo -bar (not escape, aka probihit bar)
This should enable power users and should rarely hit non power users.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 13.06.2010, at 16:46, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
what could cause this issue?
i cannot reproduce it on my dev machine, but i am pretty sure its not an
access control issue in either the file system nor the database.
INFO: Creating a connection for entity entitydelete with URL
to say.
ok i have created it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1937
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
evalutes to true and
the updated_at would be ignored in pretty much any decent RDBMS. if its false,
then the updated_at is checked as per usual.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
time, obviously less
flexible.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
an untokenized string. Of course I could just turn an
empty string into none at index time, but I am wondering how to do it in
general :)
I tried using just or [ TO ] to match for empty strings, but this
matches everything and due to the negation removes everything.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m
://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0001OR
kayak.com uses a double slider to handle the flight departure range:
http://screencast.com/t/ZjExMTE5
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
the count without and with those additional checkbox filters applied
(actually i only display two numbers of they are not the same):
http://screencast.com/t/MWUzYWZkY2Yt
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
(*) if anyone has a slider that can do the above i would love to integrate
request or should stuff like this rather be done in userland (I have noticed
for example that Solr prefers to have users normalize the scores in userland
too)?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
}information_type_id:(-1)rows=21}
Can someone give me a hint?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 25.05.2010, at 08:55, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Now when I deselect one of the checkboxes I add an fq parameters:
facet=truefl=*,scoresort=score+descstart=0q=(tag_ids:(23))facet.field={!ex%3Ddt}organisation_idfacet.field={!ex%3Ddt}tag_idsfacet.field={!ex%3Ddt}addressee_idsfacet.field={!ex
On 16.05.2010, at 21:01, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent can give you
min and max values.
Sorry my bad, I just tested StatsComponent with tdate field. And it
is not working for date typed fields. Wiki says it is for numeric
fields.
ok
points for the slider. The user can then
move the sliders to further filter the result set.
How can I best go about fetching just those min and max values, ideally without
having to add a separate query just for this?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
[1]
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
Hi,
just FYI I am using mysql-connector-java-5.1.10-bin.jar and I my full import
takes about 3 hours and I am not experiencing crashes.
regards,
Lukas
with about 16M entities.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 26.04.2010, at 12:48, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I am currently putting together a search for a DB where I have resolutions
along with their metadata as well as chapters, its text and metadata. Most of
the searching will actually be done on the metadata. The plan atm is to
support
I could just as well use one core.
grouping:
how do I best group the scores for the (a) type search? should I just do two
searches and combine the results? then again this will make paging tricky.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
. Plus if we run into any issues we can also easily rollback by just
swapping the data around again.
I would appreciate any comments you guys might have on this concept.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 07.04.2010, at 14:24, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
For Solr the idea is also just copy the index files into a new directory and
then use http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#RELOAD after updating the
config file (I assume its not possible to hot swap like with MySQL).
Since I want to keep
not some crazy use case ..
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
However you can even also define default for these parameters inside your
solrconfig.xml request handler configuration.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 16.03.2010, at 15:42, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use $deleteDocById to delete rows based on an SQL query in my
db-data-config.xml. The following tag is a top level tag in the document
tag.
entity name=company_del query=SELECT e.id AS `$deleteDocById` ROM
On 17.03.2010, at 11:36, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 16.03.2010, at 15:42, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use $deleteDocById to delete rows based on an SQL query in my
db-data-config.xml. The following tag is a top level tag in the document
tag.
entity name
(for
example to pass in the password)?
Furthermore is there some way to define default values for these request
parameters in case no value is passed in?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
the rows, its not actually issuing any
index deletes.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
to be index supported in order to perform decently):
for (i=0, icount_values(x_coord),i++)
x_coord[i] x_upper_left_coord AND x_coord[i] x_lower_right_coord AND
y_coord[i] y_upper_left_coord AND y_coord[i] y_lower_right_coord
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
in the group
into a string.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
Whats going on there?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true
words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true /
/analyzer
/fieldType
It seems I should probably use the solr.StandardTokenizerFactory anyways, but
for this case it wouldnt help either.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 10.02.2010, at 16:41, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
There is a solution to update via DIH, but is there also a way to define a
query that fetches id's for documents that should be removed?
Or to phrase the question a bit more open. I have a file with id's of documents
to delete (one per line
Hi,
There is a solution to update via DIH, but is there also a way to define a
query that fetches id's for documents that should be removed?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
, but then i would need
to read in the stopword.txt file the script, which i would like to avoid, then
again it would probably be the more efficient approach.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
. Furthermore a phrase entered can
either match on one field or any combination of fields. Phrase in this context
means separated by spaces or dash. For this I found the above approach the only
feasible solution.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
version and
remove the solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory in both analyzer sections, then it
should work however as long as terms usually start with an upper case letter if
they do contain upper case letters.
let me try this out ..
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
and requesting a field.
q=suggest_field:difl=suggest_field
Yeah, I just realized that while I was trying it out. :-)
Still testing ..
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
tough.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
Hi Ahmet,
Well after some more testing I am now convinced that you rock :)
I like the solution because its obviously way less hacky and more importantly I
expect this to be a lot faster and less memory intensive, since instead of a
facet prefix or terms search, I am doing an equality comparison
On 29.01.2010, at 15:40, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
I am still a bit unsure how to handle both the lowercased and the case
preserved version:
So here are some examples:
UBS = ubs|UBS
Kreuzstrasse = kreuzstrasse|Kreuzstrasse
So when I type Kreu I would get a suggestion of Kreuzstrasse
On 01.02.2010, at 13:27, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 29.01.2010, at 15:40, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
I am still a bit unsure how to handle both the lowercased and the case
preserved version:
So here are some examples:
UBS = ubs|UBS
Kreuzstrasse = kreuzstrasse|Kreuzstrasse
So when
this?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
Lucene doesnt support 2PhaseCommits yet?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
and I find
no (or just very few) result, then I want to also include a field that has a
doublemethaphone analyzer on the name. So I just want to append that field to
the qf setting of the request handler defaults.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
On 20.01.2010, at 15:50, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 19.01.2010, at 22:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
I also want to match multiple fields at once.
Can you give an example?
I enter Kreuz but this could either be part of a persons name or of a
street name, which are separate fields
On 19.01.2010, at 21:55, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi Lukas,
- Original Message
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org
I want to use TermsComponent for both auto complete suggestions but also
showing
Is TermsComponent really that good for AutoComplete?
Have a look
me this
number more efficiently.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
splitter etc.). I can of
course also do an OR query as well. But it would be nice to be able to do:
q=*:foo
and that would simply search all fields against the query foo.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
85 matches
Mail list logo
