.74b0dc51.13a79@airmetal.local%3E
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
If a timeout occurs, does the distributed update then go to the next
replica?
A distributed update
As of 4.10, commits/optimize etc are executed in parallel.
Excellent - thanks.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
A distributed update is streamed to all
I added distribUpdateConnTimeout and distribUpdateSoTimeout to solr.xml and
the commit did timeout.(btw, is there any way to view solr.xml in the admin
console?).
Also, although we do have an init.d start/stop script for Solr, the 'stop'
command was not executed during shutdown because there was
. The socket and
connection timeout inside the shardHandlerFactory section apply for
inter-shard search requests.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Btw, are the following timeouts still supported in solr.xml, and do they
only apply to distributed search
We are running SolrCloud in AWS and using their auto scaling groups to spin
up new Solr replicas when CPU utilization exceeds a threshold for a period
of time. All is well until the replicas are terminated when CPU utilization
falls below another threshold. What happens is that index updates sent
for
inter-shard update requests.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
We are running SolrCloud in AWS and using their auto scaling groups to
spin
up new Solr replicas when CPU utilization exceeds a threshold for a
period
of time. All is well until
/shardHandlerFactory
Thanks,
Peter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, I wasn't aware of these. I will give that a try. If I stop the Solr
jetty service manually, things recover fine, but the hang occurs when I
'stop' or 'terminate' the EC2 instance
of these issues are because of the lack of timeouts. Just add them and
if there are more problems, we can discuss more.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, I wasn't aware of these. I will give that a try. If I stop the Solr
jetty service manually, things
The AMIs are Red Hat (not Amazon's) and the instances are properly sized
for the environment (t1.micro for ZK, m3.xlarge for Solr). I do plan to add
hooks for a clean shutdown of Solr when the VM is shut down, but if Solr
takes too long, AWS may clobber it anyway. One frustrating part of auto
How are folks handling Solr exceptions that occur during batch indexing?
Solr stops parsing the docs stream when an error occurs (e.g. a doc with a
missing mandatory field), and stops indexing the batch. The bad document is
not identified, so it would be hard for the client to recover by skipping
gotten there yet.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
How are folks handling Solr exceptions that occur during batch
indexing?
Solr stops parsing the docs stream when an error occurs (e.g. a doc
with a
missing mandatory field
Regarding batch indexing:
When I send batches of 1000 docs to a standalone Solr server, the log file
reports (1000 adds) in LogUpdateProcessor. But when I send them to the
leader of a replicated index, the leader log file reports much smaller
numbers, usually (12 adds). Why do the batches appear
Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Internally, the docs are batched up into smaller buckets (10 as I
remember) and forwarded to the correct shard leader. I suspect that's
what you're seeing.
Erick
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Regarding batch
Thanks for the advice. I've moved this query rewriting logic (not really
business logic) to a SearchComponent and will leave the custom query parser
to deal with the keyword (q=) related aspects of the query. In my case, the
latter is mostly dealing with the presence of wildcard characters.
Peter
I have a custom query parser that modifies the filter query list based on
the keyword query. This works, but the 'fq' list in the responseHeader
contains the original filter list. The debugQuery output does display the
modified filter list. Is there a way to change the responseHeader? I could
It's for an optimization. If the keyword is 'match all docs', I want to
remove a custom PostFilter from the query and change the sort parameters
(so the app doesn't have to do it). It looks like the responseHeader is
displaying the 'originalParams', which are immutable.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at
I meant to say: If the keyword is *:* (MachAllDocsQuery)...
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's for an optimization. If the keyword is 'match all docs', I want to
remove a custom PostFilter from the query and change the sort parameters
(so the app
I'm doing something similar with a custom search component. See SOLR-6502
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6502
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Nope, not yet.
Someone did propose a JavascriptRequestHandler or such, which would
allow you to code
Say I have a boolean field named 'hidden', and less than 1% of the
documents in the index have hidden=true.
Do both these filter queries use the same docset cache size? :
fq=hidden:false
fq=!hidden:true
Peter
it will be cached as hidden:true and then inverted
Inverted at query time, so for best query performance use fq=hidden:false,
right?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Say I
See if SOLR-5831 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5831 helps.
Peter
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:32 PM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
What we need is a function like scale(field,min,max) but only operates on
the results that come back from the search results.
scale() takes
I implemented a custom QueryComponent that issues the edismax query with
mm=100%, and if no results are found, it reissues the query with mm=1. This
doubled our query throughput (compared to mm=1 always), as we do some
expensive RankQuery processing. For your very long student queries, mm=100%
, but on the client side with two
requests. Would you consider contributing the QueryComponent?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Sep 10, 2014, at 3:47 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com wrote:
I implemented a custom QueryComponent that issues
://soleami.com/blog/comparing-document-classification-functions-of-
lucene-and-mahout.html
(2014/08/05 22:34), Peter Keegan wrote:
When there are multiple 'external file field' files available, Solr will
reload the last one (lexicographically) with a commit, but only if changes
were made to the index
org.apache.solr.search.function.FileFloatSource.ReloadCacheRequestHandler ?
Let's me know if you need help with it.
As a workaround you can reload the core via REST or click a button at
SolrAdmin, your questions are welcome.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote
When there are multiple 'external file field' files available, Solr will
reload the last one (lexicographically) with a commit, but only if changes
were made to the index. Otherwise, it skips the reload and logs: No
uncommitted changes. Skipping IW.commit. Has anyone else noticed this? It
seems
I'm looking at how 'ReRankQuery' works. If the main query has a Sort
criteria, it is only used to sort the first pass results. The QueryScorer
used in the second pass only reorders the ScoreDocs based on score and
docid, but doesn't use the original Sort fields. If the Sort criteria is
'score
with an
AND
and using the original sort?
At the end, you have your original list in it's original order, with
(potentially) some
documents removed that don't satisfy the secondary query.
Or I'm missing the boat entirely.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee
at Heliosearch
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
javascript:;
wrote:
See http://heliosearch.org/solrs-new-re-ranking-feature/
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Erick Erickson
erickerick...@gmail.com javascript:;
wrote:
I'm having a little trouble
I bring up a new Solr node with no index and watch the index being
replicated from the leader. The index size is 12G and the replication takes
about 6 minutes, according to the replica log (from 'Starting recovery
process' to 'Finished recovery process). However, shortly after the
replication
think it is, it should only be an
issue when you directly query recovery node.
The CloudSolrServer client works around this issue as well.
--
Mark Miller
about.me/markrmiller
On July 3, 2014 at 8:42:48 AM, Peter Keegan (peterlkee...@gmail.com)
wrote:
I bring up a new Solr node
Aha, you are right wrdrvf! The query is forwarded to any of the active
shards (I saw the query alternate between both of mine). Nice feature.
Also, looking at 'ClusterStateAwarePingRequestHandler' (which I downloaded
from www.manning.com/SolrinAction), it is checking zookeeper to see if the
We are using the 'edismax' query parser for its many benefits over the
standard Lucene parser. For queries with more than 5 or 6 keywords (which
is a lot for our typical user), the recall can be very high (sometimes
matching 75% or more of the documents). This high recall, when coupled with
some
We are running Solr 4.6.1 in AWS:
- 2 Solr instances (1 shard, 1 leader, 1 replica)
- 1 CloudSolrServer SolrJ client updating the index.
- 3 Zookeepers
The Solr instances are behind a load balanceer and also in an auto scaling
group. The ScaleUpPolicy will add up to 9 additional instances
Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
Peter
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Inline responses below.
--
Mark Miller
about.me/markrmiller
On April 15, 2014 at 2:12:31 PM, Peter Keegan (peterlkee...@gmail.com)
wrote:
I have
Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
I meant 'sequentially' across shards.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
Peter
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mark Miller
I have a SolrCloud index, 1 shard, with a leader and one replica, and 3
ZKs. The Solr indexes are behind a load balancer. There is one
CloudSolrServer client updating the indexes. The index schema includes 3
ExternalFileFields. When the CloudSolrServer client issues a hard commit, I
observe that
to the
CollapsingQParserPlugin this week and it will have a similar interaction
between a PostFilter and value source. So you may want to watch SOLR-5536
to see an example of this.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee
I'm indexing data with a SolrJ client via SolrServer. Currently, I parse
the schema returned from a HttpGet on:
localhost:8983/solr/collection/schema/fields
What is the recommended way to read the schema with CloudSolrServer? Can it
be done with a single HttpGet to a ZK server?
Thanks,
Peter
it a
bit harder to detect the failure via the admin interface.
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
I have a custom data import handler that creates an ExternalFileField from
a source that is different from the main index. If the import fails
source. Worth a try I guess.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Following up on this a bit - my main index is updated by a SolrJ client
in
another process. If the DIH fails, the SolrJ client is never informed of
the index rollback, and any pending
...@gmail.com [mailto:pkeegan01...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Keegan
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 7:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to override rollback behavior in DIH
Following up on this a bit - my main index is updated by a SolrJ client in
another process
I have a custom data import handler that creates an ExternalFileField from
a source that is different from the main index. If the import fails (in my
case, a connection refused in URLDataSource), I don't want to roll back any
uncommitted changes to the main index. However, this seems to be the
you want
to open a new one?
Ahmet
On Friday, January 10, 2014 6:12 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Removing ReversedWildcardFilterFactory had no effect.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
Can you remove any occurrence
How do you disable leading wildcards in 4.X? The setAllowLeadingWildcard
method is there in the parser, but nothing references the getter. Also, the
Edismax parser always enables it and provides no way to override.
Thanks,
Peter
, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do you disable leading wildcards in 4.X? The setAllowLeadingWildcard
method is there in the parser, but nothing references the getter. Also, the
Edismax parser always enables it and provides no way to override.
Thanks,
Peter
There's also: http://www.tanukisoftware.com/
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Nazik Huq nazik...@yahoo.com wrote:
From your email I gather your main concern is starting zookeeper on server
startups.
You may want to look at these non-native service oriented options too:
Create a script(
: The bottom line for Peter is still the same: using scale() wrapped arround
: a function/query does involve a computing hte results for every document,
: and that is going to scale linearly as the size of hte index grows -- but
: it it is *only* because of the scale function.
Another problem
, 2014, at 10:00 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
Is there a simple way to output the result number (ordinal) with each
returned document using the 'fl' parameter? This would be useful when
visually comparing the results from 2 queries.
I'm not aware of a simple way.
If you're competent in Java
Is there a simple way to output the result number (ordinal) with each
returned document using the 'fl' parameter? This would be useful when
visually comparing the results from 2 queries.
Thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joel,
Could you clarify what would be in the key,value Map added to the
SearchRequest context? It seems that all the docId/score tuples need to
be
there, including the ones not in the 'top N ScoreDocs
function call will look like this:
sum(score(), field(x))
Joel
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Regarding my original goal, which is to perform a math function using the
scaled score and a field value, and sort on the result, how does
, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is pretty cool, and worthy of adding to Solr in Action (v2) and the
other books. With function queries, flexible filter processing and
caching,
custom collectors, and post filters, there's a lot of flexibility here.
Btw, the query times
,
Peter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
In order to size the PriorityQueue, the result window size for the query
is needed. This has been computed in the SolrIndexSearcher and available
in: QueryCommand.getSupersetMaxDoc(), but doesn't seem to be available
apply to 4.3.
I think as long you have the finish method that's all you'll need. If you
can get this working it would be excellent if you could donate back the
Scale PostFilter.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is what I was looking
, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Regarding my original goal, which is to perform a math function using the
scaled score and a field value, and sort on the result, how does this fit
in? Must I implement another custom PostFilter with a higher cost than
the
scale
. Is there a reason why a PostFilter
won't work for you?
Joel
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Quick question:
In the context of a custom collector, how does one get the values of a
field of type 'ExternalFileField'?
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Dec 10
)field.getType();
fieldValues = eff.getFileFloatSource(field, dataDir);
And then read the values in 'setNextReader'
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Joel,
I thought about using a PostFilter, but the problem is that the 'scale'
function must
. If the document is not in the score
map then send down 0.
You'll have setup a dummy scorer to feed to lower collectors. The
CollapsingQParserPlugin has an example of how to do this.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joel,
I thought about
the finish method that's all you'll need. If you
can get this working it would be excellent if you could donate back the
Scale PostFilter.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is what I was looking for, but the DelegatingCollector 'finish'
method
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
I've been meaning to revisit configurable ranking collectors, but I haven't
yet had a chance. It's on the shortlist of things I'd like to tackle
though.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
I looked at SOLR-4465 and SOLR-5045
Quick question:
In the context of a custom collector, how does one get the values of a
field of type 'ExternalFileField'?
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Joel,
This is related to another thread on function query matching (
http
But for your specific goal Peter: Yes, if the whole point of a function
you have is to wrap generated a scaled score of your base $qq, ...
Thanks for the confirmation, Chris. So, to do this efficiently, I think I
need to implement a custom Collector that performs the scaling (and other
math)
) != this
(in QueryValueSource).
This should be an easy fix. I'll create a JIRA ticket to use better key
names in these functions and push up a patch. This will eliminate the need
for the extra NoOp function.
-Trey
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote
In my previous posting, I said:
Subsequent calls to ScaleFloatFuntion.getValues bypassed
'createScaleInfo and added ~0 time.
These subsequent calls are for the remaining segments in the index reader
(21 segments).
Peter
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
I looked at SOLR-4465 and SOLR-5045, where it appears that there is a goal
to be able to do custom sorting and ranking in a PostFilter. So far, it
looks like only custom aggregation can be implemented in PostFilter (5045).
Custom sorting/ranking can be done in a pluggable collector (4465), but
,
Peter
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
Instead of using a function query, could I use the edismax query (plus
some low cost filters not shown in the example) and implement the
scale/sum/product computation in a PostFilter? Is the query's maxScore
Instead of using a function query, could I use the edismax query (plus some
low cost filters not shown in the example) and implement the
scale/sum/product computation in a PostFilter? Is the query's maxScore
available there?
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee
}
Is there any way to speed this up? Would writing a custom function query
that compiled all the function queries together be any faster?
Thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Yonik Seeley yo
Although the 'scale' is a big part of it, here's a closer breakdown. Here
are 4 queries with increasing functions, and theei response times (caching
turned off in solrconfig):
100 msec:
select?q={!edismax v='news' qf='title^2 body'}
135 msec:
select?qq={!edismax v='news' qf='title^2
?
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to used a normalized score in a query as I described in a
recent thread titled Re: How to get similarity score between 0 and 1 not
relative score
I'm using this query:
select?qq={!edismax v='news
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
fq=$qq
What is the proper syntax?
fq={!query v=$qq}
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.com -- making solr shine
Why does this function query return docs that don't match the embedded
query?
select?qq=text:newsq={!func}sum(query($qq),0)
, but don't filter them. All
documents effectively match a function query.
Erik
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does this function query return docs that don't match the embedded
query?
select?qq=text:newsq={!func}sum(query($qq),0)
I've done this by adding an attribute to the entity element (e.g.
myconfig=myconfig.xml), and reading it in the 'init' method with
context.getResolvedEntityAttribute(myconfig).
Peter
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Ramesh ramesh.po...@vensaiinc.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Can anyone suggest me
There's another use case for scaling the score. Suppose I want to compute a
custom score based on the weighted sum of:
- product(0.75, relevance score)
- product(0.25, value from another field)
For this to work, both fields must have values between 0-1, for example.
Toby's example using the
I'm running 4.3 in solrcloud mode and trying to test index recovery, but
it's failing.
I have one shard, 2 replicas:
Leader: 10.159.8.105
Replica: 10.159.6.73
To test, I stopped the replica, deleted the 'data' directory and restarted
solr. Here is the replica's logging:
INFO - 2013-10-25
Have you tried this old trick to warm the FS cache?
cat .../core/data/index/* /dev/null
Peter
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:31 AM, michael.boom my_sky...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thank you, Otis!
I've integrated the SPM on my Solr instances and now I have access to
monitoring data.
Could you give me
I found this warming to be especially necessary after starting an instance
of those m3.xlarge servers, else the response times for the first minutes
was terrible.
Peter
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, François Schiettecatte
fschietteca...@gmail.com wrote:
To put the file data into file
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com adlı kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
On 10/8/13 6:51 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
Is there a way to configure Solr 'defaults/appends/invariants' such that
the product of the 'start' and 'rows' parameters doesn't exceed a given
value? This would be to prevent deep pagination
Is there a way to configure Solr 'defaults/appends/invariants' such that
the product of the 'start' and 'rows' parameters doesn't exceed a given
value? This would be to prevent deep pagination. Or would this require a
custom requestHandler?
Peter
In 4.3, frange query using an external file works for both q and fq. The
Solr wiki and SIA both state that ExternalFileField does not support
searching. Was the search/filter capability added recently, or is it not
supported?
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Upayavira
returned by the inner
query?
As Joel mentions, those other joins are attempts to find other ways to
work with this limitation.
Upayavira
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013, at 09:44 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
Hi Joel,
I tried this patch and it is quite a bit faster. Using the same query
the
fromIndex. If you have a small number of results in the fromIndex the
standard join will be faster.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
I forgot to mention - this is Solr 4.3
Peter
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee
I'm doing a cross-core join query and the join query is 30X slower than
each of the 2 individual queries. Here are the queries:
Main query: http://localhost:8983/solr/mainindex/select?q=title:java
QTime: 5 msec
hit count: 1000
Sub query: http://localhost:8983/solr/subindex/select?q=+fld1:[0.1 TO
Aren't you concerned about having a single point of failure with this setup?
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Michael Ryan mr...@moreover.com wrote:
From a performance point of view, I can't imagine it mattering. In our
setup, we have a dedicated Solr server that is not a shard that takes
?
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could you index your 'phrase tags' as single tokens? Then your phrase
queries become simple TermQuerys.
5) *This is my current favorite*: stop tokenizing/analyzing these
terms and just use KeywordTokenizer. Most
Could you index your 'phrase tags' as single tokens? Then your phrase
queries become simple TermQuerys.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Aaron Daubman daub...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
We have a solr instance in use
We're using MMSeg with Lucene, but not Solr. Since each SolrCore is
independent, I'm not sure how you can avoid each having a copy of the
dictionary, unless you modified MMSeg to use shared memory. Or, maybe I
missing something.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:37 AM, liyun liyun2...@corp.netease.com
into the tree, or before we start
processing the query string?
Thanks!
Roman
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Roman,
I'm not familiar with the contrib, but you can write your own Java code
to
create Query objects from the tree produced
Roman,
I'm not familiar with the contrib, but you can write your own Java code to
create Query objects from the tree produced by your lexer and parser
something like this:
StandardLuceneGrammarLexer lexer = new ANTLRReaderStream(new
StringReader(queryString));
CommonTokenStream tokens = new
We have 16 shards on 4 physical servers. Shard size was determined by
measuring query response times as a function of doc count. Multiple shards
per server provides parallelism. In a VM environment, I would lean towards 1
shard per VM (with 1/4 the RAM). We implemented our own distributed search
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Ben Preece preec...@umn.edu wrote:
As someone who's new to Solr/Lucene, I'm having trouble finding information
on sorting results in localized alphabetical order. I've ineffectively
searched the wiki and the mail archives.
I'm thinking for example about
Can you use jetty?
http://www.lucidimagination.com/developers/articles/setting-up-apache-solr-in-eclipse
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Geeta Subramanian
gsubraman...@commvault.com wrote:
Hi,
Can some please let me know the steps on how can I debug the solr code in
my eclipse?
I tried
The instructions refer to the 'Run configuration' menu. Did you try 'Debug
configurations'?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you use jetty?
http://www.lucidimagination.com/developers/articles/setting-up-apache-solr-in-eclipse
On Thu, Mar 17
I was looking at 'CapitalizationFilter' and noticed that the
'incrementToken' method splits words at ' ' (space) and '.' (period). I'm
curious as to why the period is treated as a word separator? This could
cause unexpected results, for example:
Hello There My Name Is Dr. Watson --- Hello There
fwiw, our proxy server has blocked this site for malicious content.
Peter
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Oct 25, 2010, at 12:54 PM, scott chu wrote:
I happen to bump into this site: http://www.solr.biz/
They said they are also developing a
I listened with great interest to Grant's presentation of the NoSQL
comparisons/alternatives to Solr/Lucene. It sounds like the jury is still
out on much of this. Here's a use case that might favor using a NoSQL
alternative for storing 'stored fields' outside of Lucene.
When Solr does a
How about this: x:[5 TO 8] AND x:{0 TO 8}
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I think the square brackets/curly braces need to be balanced, so this is
currently not doable with existing query parsers.
Otis
--
Sematext --
Hi Yonik,
May I ask in which class(es) this improvement was made? I've been using the
DocSet, DocList, BitDocSet, HashDocSet from Solr from a few years ago with a
Lucene based app. to do faceting.
Thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new
100 matches
Mail list logo
