area of overlap in polygon intersection

2017-11-13 Thread Thaer Sammar
Hi all, we are looking for a way to use solr functionality to return the overlapping area result from polygon intersection. The intersection as far as we know will return all polygons that intersect with the given radius, but we are interested on the overlap part only. In our index, we store

solr in memory testing

2017-08-08 Thread Thaer Sammar
Hi, We are using solr 6.6, and we are looking for guidance documentation or java example on how to create a solr core inmeory for the purpose of testing using solrj. We found https://wiki.searchtechnologies.com/index.php/Unit_Testing_with_Embedded_Solr but this works for solr v.4 and earlier

Re: index new discovered fileds of different types

2017-07-10 Thread Thaer Sammar
ight want > string fields. Add an ID field, which could be automatically generated by > Solr, so now you have four fields. Or am I on a tangent again? Cheers -- > Rick > > On July 7, 2017 6:01:00 AM EDT, Thaer Sammar <t.sam...@geophy.com> wrote: > >Hi Jan, > > >

Re: index new discovered fileds of different types

2017-07-07 Thread Thaer Sammar
ch solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > 5. jul. 2017 kl. 15.23 skrev Thaer Sammar <t.sam...@geophy.com>: > > > > Hi, > > We are trying to index documents of different types. Document have > different fields. fields are known at indexing time. We r

Re: index new discovered fileds of different types

2017-07-05 Thread Thaer Sammar
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schemaless+Mode > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Thaer Sammar <t.sam...@geophy.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > We are trying to index documents of different types. Document have > > different fields. fields are known at indexing

index new discovered fileds of different types

2017-07-05 Thread Thaer Sammar
Hi, We are trying to index documents of different types. Document have different fields. fields are known at indexing time. We run a query on a database and we index what comes using query variables as field names in solr. Our current solution: we use dynamic fields with prefix, for example