Possible to adjust FieldNorm?

2011-12-14 Thread cnyee
Hi, Is it possible to adjust FieldNorm? I have a scenario where the search is not producing the desired result because of fieldNorm: Search terms: coaching leadership Record 1: name=Ask the Coach, desc=...,... Record 2: name=Coaching as a Leadership Development Tool Part 1, desc=...,... Record

Re: Possible to adjust FieldNorm?

2011-12-14 Thread cnyee
Sorry, I did not give the full output in the first post. For what it looks, the fieldNorm is saying that: 1 match out of 3 words in record 1 is more significant than 2 matches out of 8 words in record 2. That would be true for simple arithmetic, but unsatisfactory in human 'meaning'. Here are

Re: Multiplexing TokenFilter for multi-language?

2011-08-09 Thread cnyee
I believe that the FilterFactory is not designed to be called for each instant of field processing. Think of it, that would be terribly inefficient. The instantiated stemmer is meant to be reused as much as possible. Maybe the FilterFactory is called to instantiate a new stemmer in association

Multiplexing TokenFilter for multi-language?

2011-08-08 Thread cnyee
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but I have already spent a couple of days googling in vain The problem: - documents in multiple languages (us, de, fr, es). - language is known (a team of editors determines the language manually, and users are asked to specify language option for

Re: Logically equivalent queries but vastly different no of results?

2011-07-25 Thread cnyee
Yes - I am using edismax but the reason is not obvious to me can you give me a pointer? Thanks Yee -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Logically-equivalent-queries-but-vastly-different-no-of-results-tp3190278p3199362.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing

Re: Logically equivalent queries but vastly different no of results?

2011-07-22 Thread cnyee
I think I know what it is. The second query has higher scores than the first. The additional condition domain_ids:(0^1.3 OR 1) which evaluates to true always - pushed up the scores and allows a LOT more records to pass. Is there a better way of doing this? Regards, Yee -- View this message in

What is the different?

2011-07-21 Thread cnyee
Hi, I have two queries: (1) q = (change management) (2) q = (change management) AND domain_ids:(0^1.3 OR 1) The purpose of the (2) is to boost the records with domain_ids=0. In my database all records has domain_ids = 0 or 1, so domains_ids:(0 or 1) will always returns the full database. Now

Re: Facet filter: how to specify OR expression?

2011-05-12 Thread cnyee
It works. Many thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facet-filter-how-to-specify-OR-expression-tp2930570p2930783.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Facet filter: how to specify OR expression?

2011-05-12 Thread cnyee
I have another facet that is of type integer and it gave an exception. Is it true that the field has to be of type string or text for the OR expression to work? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facet-filter-how-to-specify-OR-expression-tp2930570p2930863.html

Re: Facet filter: how to specify OR expression?

2011-05-12 Thread cnyee
The exception says: java.lang.NumberFormatExcepton: for input string or The field type is: fieldType name=tint class=solr.TrieIntField precisionStep=8 omitNorms=true positionIncrementGap=0/ -- View this message in context:

Facet filter: how to specify OR expression?

2011-05-11 Thread cnyee
Hi, Is there anyway to specify an 'OR' expression for facet filter? For example docType=pdf or docType=txt Many thanks in advance. Yee -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facet-filter-how-to-specify-OR-expression-tp2930570p2930570.html Sent from the Solr - User