Re: Congratulations to the new Apache Solr PMC Chair, Jan Høydahl!
Congratulations Jan!! El vie, 19 feb 2021 a las 5:56, Atita Arora () escribió: > Congratulations Jan! > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:41 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > > Congratulations, Jan! > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:56 PM Anshum Gupta > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I’d like to inform everyone that the newly formed Apache Solr PMC > > nominated and elected Jan Høydahl for the position of the Solr PMC Chair > > and Vice President. This decision was approved by the board in its > February > > 2021 meeting. > > > > > > Congratulations Jan! > > > > > > -- > > > Anshum Gupta > > >
Re: Spellchecker component with multiple cores
Hi, I'm facing this same topic, but in my case, I have multiple cores and I want only one spellchecker index from all this cores. If I create a new core and index all documents from the other cores to this new core, and use the new core to implement the spellchecker can be a solution? Currently, I'm running on SOLR 3.5 best regards, *Eduardo Henriques* On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebio sebastian.barszczew...@gmail.comwrote: Hello solr users, i want to use the spellchecker component. All examples and tutorials i found are dealing with one index. Our solr setup has multiple cores each one for a single language. The spellchecker component should be based on the different languages in the cores. I am unsure how to handle the setup. Does it make sense to have a spellchecker index for each index/language? If so how to handle the solrconfig.xml files. Do i have to configure the request handlers and spellchecker components in each core solrconfig.xml? Is it possible to configure the dictionaries in the cores? What is the general case with core configurations. Does core configuration files extend or overwrite the global config files? Perhaps someone could help me with that topic. Kind regards, Sebastian -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spellchecker-component-with-multiple-cores-tp3996216.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Pivot with Stats (or Stats with Pivot)
Nobody? Please, help edua...@calandra.com.br 17/05/2011 16:13 Please respond to solr-user@lucene.apache.org To solr-user@lucene.apache.org cc Subject Pivot with Stats (or Stats with Pivot) Hi All, Is it possible to get stats (like Stats Component: min ,max, sum, count, missing, sumOfSquares, mean and stddev) from numeric fields inside hierarchical facets (with more than one level, like Pivot)? I would like to query: ...?q=*:*version=2.2start=0rows=0stats=truestats.field=numeric_field1stats.field=numeric_field2stats.pivot=field_x,field_y,field_z and get min, max, sum, count, etc. from numeric_field1 and numeric_field2 from all combinations of field_x, field_y and field_z (hierarchical values). Using stats.facet I get just one field at one level and using facet.pivot I get just counts, but no stats. Looping in client application to do all combinations of facets values will be to slow because there is a lot of combinations. Thanks a lot!
Re: Pivot with Stats (or Stats with Pivot)
I would like to request this feature. How can I do that? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pivot-with-Stats-or-Stats-with-Pivot-tp2953789p2975341.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Pivot with Stats (or Stats with Pivot)
Hi All, Is it possible to get stats (like Stats Component: min ,max, sum, count, missing, sumOfSquares, mean and stddev) from numeric fields inside hierarchical facets (with more than one level, like Pivot)? I would like to query: ...?q=*:*version=2.2start=0rows=0stats=truestats.field=numeric_field1stats.field=numeric_field2stats.pivot=field_x,field_y,field_z and get min, max, sum, count, etc. from numeric_field1 and numeric_field2 from all combinations of field_x, field_y and field_z (hierarchical values). Using stats.facet I get just one field at one level and using facet.pivot I get just counts, but no stats. Looping in client application to do all combinations of facets values will be to slow because there is a lot of combinations. Thanks a lot!
