There may be APIs which are introduced after 1.3 release and are not
yet crystallized , may change by the time release happens.
As a rule of thumb any feature in the CHANGES.TXT post 1.3 is possible
to change . But as long as you know what you are using you should be
OK.
It is not quite possible to ensure that everything works perfectly .
but, what you can do is,
what ever features you use , test them thoroughly . If you face issues
report them back
--Noble
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:28 PM, ristretto.rb ristretto...@gmail.com wrote:
I have built the trunk code as of Revision: 765826 and tried !tag=/!ex=
which is what I need to work. And IT WORKS! That's great.
Now, is it unwise to release 1.4 into production for this feature (based
on my explanation below)?
thanks
gene
-- Forwarded message --
From: ristretto.rb ristretto...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Subject: Advice on moving from 1.3 to 1.4-dev or trunk?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hello, I'm using solr 1.3 with solr.py. We have a basic schema.xml,
nothing custom or out of the ordinary.
I need the following the feature from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
SOLR-911: Add support for multi-select faceting by allowing filters to be
tagged and facet commands to exclude certain filters. This patch also
added the ability to change the output key for facets in the response, and
optimized distributed faceting refinement by lowering parsing overhead and
by making requests and responses smaller.
Since this requires 1.4, looks like I have to upgrade (or roll my own
solution that this feature provides.)
I'm looking for a bit of advice. I have looked through the bugs here
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR/fixforversion/12313351
1. I would need to get the source for 1.4 and build it, right? No
release yet, eh?
2. Any one using 1.4 in production without issue; is this wise? Or
should I wait?
3. Will I need to make changes to my schema.xml to support my current
field set under 1.4?
4. Do I need to reindex all my data?
thanks
gene
--
--Noble Paul