Re: Difference in boolean query parsing. Solr-5.4.0 VS Solr.6.1.0

2016-08-04 Thread Steve Rowe
It’s fairly likely these differences are as a result of SOLR-2649[1] (released with 5.5) and SOLR-8812[2] (released with 6.1). If you haven’t seen it, I recommend you read Hoss'ss blog “Why Not AND, OR, And NOT?” . If you can, add

Difference in boolean query parsing. Solr-5.4.0 VS Solr.6.1.0

2016-08-04 Thread Modassar Ather
Hi, During migration from Solr-5.4.1 to Solr-6.1.0 I saw a difference in the behavior of few of my boolean queries. As per my current understanding the default operator comes in when there is no operator present in between two terms. Also both the ANDed terms are marked mandatory if not, any of

RE: Boolean query in Solr

2009-05-25 Thread Sagar Khetkade
From: e...@ehatchersolutions.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Boolean query in Solr Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:33:27 -0400 On Apr 14, 2009, at 5:38 AM, Sagar Khetkade wrote: Hi, I am using SolrJ and firing the query on Solr indexes. The indexed contains three

Boolean query in Solr

2009-04-14 Thread Sagar Khetkade
Hi, I am using SolrJ and firing the query on Solr indexes. The indexed contains three fields viz. 1. Document_id (type=integer required= true) 2. Ticket Id (type= integer) 3. Content (type=text) Here the query formulation is such that I am having query with “AND” clause. So

Re: Boolean query in Solr

2009-04-14 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Apr 14, 2009, at 5:38 AM, Sagar Khetkade wrote: Hi, I am using SolrJ and firing the query on Solr indexes. The indexed contains three fields viz. 1. Document_id (type=integer required= true) 2. Ticket Id (type= integer) 3. Content (type=text) Here the query