/LUCENE-4698
~ David
--
Bill Bell
billnbell@
cell 720-256-8076
-
Author:
http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Distance-sort-on-a-multi-value-field-tp
4084666p4085797.html
Sent
-8076
-
Author:
http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Distance-sort-on-a-multi-value-field-tp
4084666p4085797.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Distance-sort-on-a-multi-value-field-tp4084666p4085797.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We have been using 2155 for over 6 months in production with over 2M hits
every 10 minutes. No OOM yet.
2155 seems great, and would this issue be any worse than 2155?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Jeff Wartes jwar...@whitepages.com wrote:
Hm, Give me all the stores that only have
I'm still pondering aggregate-type operations for scoring multi-valued
fields (original thread: http://goo.gl/zOX53f ), and it occurred to me
that distance-sort with SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType must be doing
something like that.
Somewhat surprisingly I don't see this in the documentation
On 8/14/13 2:26 PM, Jeff Wartes jwar...@whitepages.com wrote:
I'm still pondering aggregate-type operations for scoring multi-valued
fields (original thread: http://goo.gl/zOX53f ), and it occurred to me
that distance-sort with SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType must be doing
something like
Hm, Give me all the stores that only have branches in this area might be
a plausible use case for farthest distance.
That's essentially a contains question though, so maybe that's already
supported? I guess it depends on how contains/intersects/etc handle
multi-values. I feel like multi-value
