Re: Hierarchal Faceting Field Type

2009-05-04 Thread Nasseam Elkarra
Hello Koji, I applied the patch: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64 It's working but I have a question about facet.prefix. When we add a facet.prefix it filters the facet results but not the query results. Is there a way to filter both? Thank you, Nasseam On Apr 14, 2009, at

Re: Hierarchal Faceting Field Type

2009-05-04 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Nasseam Elkarra nass...@bodukai.com wrote: Hello Koji, I applied the patch: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64 It's working but I have a question about facet.prefix. When we add a facet.prefix it filters the facet results but not the query results.  

Re: Hierarchal Faceting Field Type

2009-04-21 Thread Nasseam Elkarra
Thank you. We tried your suggestion but we are still getting the following problem: fieldType name=category class=solr.TextField analyzer type=store tokenizer class=solr.PatternTokenizerFactory pattern=;/ /analyzer /fieldType field name=my_facet type=category

Re: Hierarchal Faceting Field Type

2009-04-17 Thread Chris Hostetter
: level one# : level one#level two# : level one#level two#level three# : : Trying to find the right combination of field type and query to get the : desired results. Saw some previous posts about hierarchal facets which helped : in the generating the right query but having an issue using the

Hierarchal Faceting Field Type

2009-04-14 Thread Nasseam Elkarra
Background: Set up a system for hierarchal categories using the following scheme: level one# level one#level two# level one#level two#level three# Trying to find the right combination of field type and query to get the desired results. Saw some previous posts about hierarchal facets which

Re: Hierarchal Faceting Field Type

2009-04-14 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
Nasseam Elkarra wrote: Background: Set up a system for hierarchal categories using the following scheme: level one# level one#level two# level one#level two#level three# Trying to find the right combination of field type and query to get the desired results. Saw some previous posts about