https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_6_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/analysis/ReversedWildcardFilterFactory.html
?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:01 AM mosheB wrote:
>
> Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex
> queries?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene
Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex
queries?
Thanks
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi Sundeep,
The simplified explanation is that terms are indexed to be more prefix search
friendly (and that is why Amrit suggested that you index term reversed if you
want leading wildcard). If you use leading wildcard, there is no structure to
limit terms that can be matched and engine has to
Sundeep,
You would like to explore
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_6_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/analysis/ReversedWildcardFilterFactory.html
here probably.
Thanks
Amrit Sarkar
On 18 Nov 2017 6:06 a.m., "Sundeep T" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have several indexed string fields which is not tokenized a
Hi,
We have several indexed string fields which is not tokenized and does not
have docValues enabled.
When we do leading wildcard searches on these fields they are running very
slow. We were thinking that since this field is indexed, such queries
should be running pretty quickly. We are using So