Re: No live SolrServers triggered by maxclausecount

2016-06-28 Thread Pablo Anzorena
Thanks! I will analyze it and let you know. 2016-06-28 11:25 GMT-03:00 Erick Erickson : > OK, but the consider what you can do to keep from having to > create such things. > 1> for infix notation (leading and trailing wildcards) you can > use ngrams to turn them

Re: No live SolrServers triggered by maxclausecount

2016-06-28 Thread Erick Erickson
OK, but the consider what you can do to keep from having to create such things. 1> for infix notation (leading and trailing wildcards) you can use ngrams to turn them into simple queries. These are performance-killers. 2> Use reverseWildcardFactory to deal with leading wildcards 3>

Re: No live SolrServers triggered by maxclausecount

2016-06-28 Thread Pablo Anzorena
Hi Erick, thanks for answering. I attached the image to the body so you can see it. Why do I need so many clauses? It is because I have two text fields that contains in average 25 words with a lot of typos (which I'm not cleaning it) and on top of that the index consists of 25 million records.

Re: No live SolrServers triggered by maxclausecount

2016-06-27 Thread Erick Erickson
That error sometimes gets reported inappropriately, as long as the servers are live you can pretty much ignore it. Attachments pretty much all get stripped by the mail server so we can't see your screen shot. Setting your max clause count to over 100K is pretty much an anti-pattern, what in the

No live SolrServers triggered by maxclausecount

2016-06-27 Thread Pablo Anzorena
Hi, I have an ensemble zookeeper consisting of 3 machines and 2 machines with solrcloud. With a high frequency I see in the logging: *No live SolrServers available to handle this request:[http://solr2:8983/solr/usa_bills_imp_2016_2016062300_shard1_replica1