Re: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes

2010-09-18 Thread Simon Willnauer
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:

 : Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the format is nailed down,
 : and some sort of porting is possible?
 : Does anyone know of a tool that can read the entire contents of a Solr index
 : and (re)write it another? (as an indexing operation - eg 2.9 - 3.0.x, so 
 not
 : repl)

 3.0.2 should be able to read 2.9 indexes, so you can open a 2.9 index in
 3.0.2, optimize, and magicly have a 3.x index.

There will also be tool / mechanism to do the same on 4.0 - it is not
100% nailed down how this might work eventually but it seems to be
very likely that there will be a read only support for old indexes - a
merge will then build new-style segments out of old-style segments.

simon

 -Hoss

 --
 http://lucenerevolution.org/  ...  October 7-8, Boston
 http://bit.ly/stump-hoss      ...  Stump The Chump!




Re: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes

2010-09-17 Thread Chris Hostetter

: Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the format is nailed down,
: and some sort of porting is possible?
: Does anyone know of a tool that can read the entire contents of a Solr index
: and (re)write it another? (as an indexing operation - eg 2.9 - 3.0.x, so not
: repl)

3.0.2 should be able to read 2.9 indexes, so you can open a 2.9 index in 
3.0.2, optimize, and magicly have a 3.x index.

-Hoss

--
http://lucenerevolution.org/  ...  October 7-8, Boston
http://bit.ly/stump-hoss  ...  Stump The Chump!



Re: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes

2010-09-12 Thread Ryan McKinley
 I suppose an index 'remaker' might be something like a DIH reader for
 a Solr index - streams everything out of the existing index, writing
 it into the new one?

This works fine if all fields are stored (and copy field does not go
to a stored field), otherwise you would need/want to start with the
orignial source.

ryan


No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes

2010-09-10 Thread peter . sturge

Hi,

I'm sure there are good reasons for the decision to no longer support 2.9  
format indexes in 4.0, and not have an automatic upgrade as in previous  
versions.


Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the format is nailed  
down, and some sort of porting is possible?
Does anyone know of a tool that can read the entire contents of a Solr  
index and (re)write it another? (as an indexing operation - eg 2.9 -  
3.0.x, so not repl)


Thanks,
Peter


Re: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes

2010-09-10 Thread Dennis Gearon
So converting an index would be faster than remaking it?

Dennis Gearon

Signature Warning

EARTH has a Right To Life,
  otherwise we all die.

Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php


--- On Fri, 9/10/10, peter.stu...@gmail.com peter.stu...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: peter.stu...@gmail.com peter.stu...@gmail.com
 Subject: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Date: Friday, September 10, 2010, 8:20 AM
 Hi,
 
 I'm sure there are good reasons for the decision to no
 longer support 2.9 format indexes in 4.0, and not have an
 automatic upgrade as in previous versions.
 
 Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the
 format is nailed down, and some sort of porting is
 possible?
 Does anyone know of a tool that can read the entire
 contents of a Solr index and (re)write it another? (as an
 indexing operation - eg 2.9 - 3.0.x, so not repl)
 
 Thanks,
 Peter
 


Re: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes

2010-09-10 Thread Peter Sturge
If a tool exists for converting 2.9-3.0.x, it would likely be faster.
Do you know if such a tool exists?
Remaking the index, in my case, can only be done from the existing
index because the original data is no longer available (it is
transient network data).
I suppose an index 'remaker' might be something like a DIH reader for
a Solr index - streams everything out of the existing index, writing
it into the new one?


Peter



On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Dennis Gearon gear...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 So converting an index would be faster than remaking it?

 Dennis Gearon

 Signature Warning
 
 EARTH has a Right To Life,
  otherwise we all die.

 Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
 Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php


 --- On Fri, 9/10/10, peter.stu...@gmail.com peter.stu...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: peter.stu...@gmail.com peter.stu...@gmail.com
 Subject: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Date: Friday, September 10, 2010, 8:20 AM
 Hi,

 I'm sure there are good reasons for the decision to no
 longer support 2.9 format indexes in 4.0, and not have an
 automatic upgrade as in previous versions.

 Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the
 format is nailed down, and some sort of porting is
 possible?
 Does anyone know of a tool that can read the entire
 contents of a Solr index and (re)write it another? (as an
 indexing operation - eg 2.9 - 3.0.x, so not repl)

 Thanks,
 Peter