On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:51 AM, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
is it possible to configure solr to store the document URI in the
lucene index (the URI is not an xml field, but just the document's
location)?
Yes. Set the field to be store and non-indexed, field type string
is what I use.
Or is
Hello Erik,
thanks for the fast answer (sry for my mail not indenting but must use webmail
:-( ), but the problem I am facing is that I do not see solr storing the
location of the documents it indexed. So, I need to store the location of a
document in a field, but I do not see where solr
- Original Message
From: Ard Schrijvers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:02:25 AM
Subject: RE: storing the document URI in the index
Hello Erik,
thanks for the fast answer (sry for my mail not indenting but must use webmail
:-( ), but the problem
Subject: RE: storing the document URI in the index
Hello Erik,
thanks for the fast answer (sry for my mail not indenting but must use webmail
:-( ), but the problem I am facing is that I do not see solr storing the
location of the documents it indexed. So, I need to store the location
Subject: RE: storing the document URI in the index
Hello Erik,
thanks for the fast answer (sry for my mail not indenting but must use webmail
:-( ), but the problem I am facing is that I do not see solr storing the
location of the documents it indexed. So, I need to store the location
On 6/12/07, Ard Schrijvers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for the info. Would it a be an improvement to be able to specify in the schema.xml
wether or not the URI should be stored or not in a field which name you can also specify
in the schema? It might be very well possible that you do not
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Ard Schrijvers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:02:25 AM
Subject: RE: storing the document URI in the index
Hello Erik
Thanks Yonik and Walter,
putting it that way, it does make good sense to not store the transient xml
file which it is most of the usecases (I was thinking differently because I do
have xml files on file system or over http, like from a webdav call)
Anyway, thx for all answers, and again, sry
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:33 +0200, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
Thanks Yonik and Walter,
putting it that way, it does make good sense to not store the transient xml
file which it is most of the usecases (I was thinking differently because I
do have xml files on file system or over http, like from
