:)
Ok, ok.
I don´t think that this kind of investment($$$) so incredibly hilarious :)
Maybe I could ask Why use Solr and not use FAST ?. It is a really big
diference :)
But I think you are correct. Sorry .
William.
On Dec 13, 2007 3:28 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Why
On Dec 12, 2007, at 2:50 AM, Nuno Leitao wrote:
FAST uses two pipelines - an ingestion pipeline (for document
feeding) and a query pipeline which are fully programmable (i.e.,
you can customize it fully). At ingestion time you typically prepare
documents for indexing (tokenize,
I think it all depends, what do you want out of Solr or FAST?
Thanks!
Matthew Runo
Software Developer
702.943.7833
On Dec 11, 2007, at 2:09 PM, William Silva wrote:
Hi,
How is the best way to compare SOLR and FAST Search ?
Thanks,
William.
Hi,
Why use FAST and not use SOLR ? For example.
What will FAST offer that will justify the investment ?
I would like a matrix comparing both.
Thanks,
William.
On Dec 11, 2007 8:15 PM, Matthew Runo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it all depends, what do you want out of Solr or FAST?
Stability and better Support (at great cost obviously)
On Dec 11, 2007 10:20 PM, William Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Why use FAST and not use SOLR ? For example.
What will FAST offer that will justify the investment ?
I would like a matrix comparing both.
Thanks,
William.
On Dec
Depends, if you are looking for a small sized index (gigabytes rather
than dozens or hundreds of gigabytes or terabytes) with relatively
simple requirements (a few facets, simple tokenization, English only
linguistics, etc.) Solr is likely to be appropriate for most cases.
FAST however
Could you please elaborate on what you mean by ingestion pipeline and
horizontal scalability? I apologize if this is a stupid question
everyone else on the forum is familiar with.
Thanks,
Ravi
On Dec 12, 2007 1:09 AM, Nuno Leitao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends, if you are looking for a small
FAST uses two pipelines - an ingestion pipeline (for document feeding)
and a query pipeline which are fully programmable (i.e., you can
customize it fully). At ingestion time you typically prepare documents
for indexing (tokenize, character normalize, lemmatize, clean up text,
perform
needs. It's
turned out to be worthwhile because we only want to do one thing really
well and we can customize Solr for it.
Lance
-Original Message-
From: Nuno Leitao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR X FAST
- Original Message
From: Nuno Leitao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 8:50:37 PM
Subject: Re: SOLR X FAST
FAST uses two pipelines - an ingestion pipeline (for document feeding)
and a query pipeline which are fully programmable (i.e., you can
10 matches
Mail list logo
