ginal Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 8:35 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
What's happen at AutoCompleteAPI.java:170 ?
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:28 PM Kaminski, Adi
mailto:adi.kamin...@verint.com>>
wrote
ase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
> [tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> [?:1.8.0_201]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> [?:1.8.0_201
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1415)
> [tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
> [tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
> at
>
)
[tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_201]
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gerlowski
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 5:40 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
Hey Adi,
There was a separate JIRA
Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:14 AM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
>
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11775
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:00 AM Kaminski, Adi
> mailto:adi.kamin...
Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:14 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11775
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:00 AM Kaminski, Adi
mailto:adi.kamin...@verint.com>>
t).longValue() ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 8:53 AM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
>
> I suppose there's an issue, which no one ever took a look.
>
> https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.
fact response strange behaviour
I suppose there's an issue, which no one ever took a look.
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/JSON-facets-count-a-long-or-an-integer-in-cloud-and-non-cloud-modes-td4265291.html
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:47 PM Kaminski, Adi
wrote:
> SolrJ client is u
I suppose there's an issue, which no one ever took a look.
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/JSON-facets-count-a-long-or-an-integer-in-cloud-and-non-cloud-modes-td4265291.html
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:47 PM Kaminski, Adi
wrote:
> SolrJ client is used of SolrCloud of Solr 8.3 version for
SolrJ client is used of SolrCloud of Solr 8.3 version for JSON Facets
requests...any idea why not consistent ?
Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
On Jan 27, 2020 22:13, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Hello,
It might be different between SolrCloud and standalone mode. No data enough
to make a conclusion.
Hello,
It might be different between SolrCloud and standalone mode. No data enough
to make a conclusion.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:40 PM Rudenko, Artur
wrote:
> I'm trying to parse facet response, but sometimes the count returns as
> Long type and sometimes as Integer type(on different
I'm trying to parse facet response, but sometimes the count returns as Long
type and sometimes as Integer type(on different environments), The error is:
"java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to
java.lang.Long"
Can you please explain why this happenes? Why it not
12 matches
Mail list logo
