Tried using the ord() function, but it was the same as the standard sort.
Do I just need to bite the bullet and reindex everything?
Thanks!
Pete
On Oct 21, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
I don't know if you'll find exactly what you need, but you can sort by any
field or
Hi everyone,
I have a field that has a letter in it (for example, 1A1, 2A1, 11C15, etc.).
Sorting it seems to work most of the time, except for a few things, like 10A1
is lower than 8A100, and 10A100 is lower than 10A99. Any ideas? I bet if my
data had leading zeros (ie 10A099), it would
Well, yes. You probably have a string field for that content, right? so the
content is being compared as strings, not as numbers, that why something
like 1000 is lower than 2. Leading zeros would be an option. Another option
is to separate the field into numeric fields and sort by those (this last
Is there a way to use a custom sorter, to avoid re-indexing?
Thanks!
Pete
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
Well, yes. You probably have a string field for that content, right? so the
content is being compared as strings, not as numbers, that why something
like 1000
I don't know if you'll find exactly what you need, but you can sort by any
field or FunctionQuery. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Peter Spam ps...@mac.com wrote:
Is there a way to use a custom sorter, to avoid re-indexing?
Thanks!
Pete
On
