Sent from my iPad
Hello
I've been trying to index IMDB data from MySQL with no success yet. The
problem was with the data import handler. When I specify using of
"SqlEntityProcessor", DIH either totally skipped the row, or didn't start
importing at all, or the results are not searchable. I also tried setting
remove
suppressed data.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/unstable-results-on-refresh-tp4164913p4165086.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 10/23/2014 2:44 AM, Giovanni Bricconi wrote:
My user interface shows some boxes to describe results categories. After
half a day of small updates and delete I noticed with various queries that
the boxes started swapping while browsing.
For sure I relied too much in getting the same results
idf
values.
We solved this problem by doing an optimize operation which really
remove
suppressed data.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/unstable-results-on-refresh-tp4164913p4165086.html
Sent from
values.
We solved this problem by doing an optimize operation which really
remove
suppressed data.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/unstable-results-on-refresh-tp4164913p4165086.html
Sent from the Solr
.n3.nabble.com/unstable-results-on-refresh-tp4164913p4165086.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I noticed the problem looking at a group query, the groups returned where
sorted on the score field of the first result, and then showed to the user.
Repeating the same query I noticed that the order of two group started
switching
Thank you, I will look for the thread you said
2014-10-20 22:07
was that the different nodes have slightly different idf values.
We solved this problem by doing an optimize operation which really remove
suppressed data.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/unstable-results-on-refresh
was that the different nodes have slightly different idf values.
We solved this problem by doing an optimize operation which really remove
suppressed data.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/unstable-results-on-refresh-tp4164913p4165086
Hello
I have a procedure that sends small data changes during the day to a
solrcloud cluster, version 4.8
The cluster is made of three nodes, and three shards, each node contains
two shards
The procedure has been running for days; I don't know when but at some
point one of the cores has gone
Can you please provide us the exception when the shard goes out of sync ?
Please monitor the logs.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/unstable-results-on-refresh-tp4164913p4165002.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
What are the differences on. The document count or things like facets?
This could be important.
Also, I think there was a similar thread on the mailing list a week or
two ago, might be worth looking for it.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources
total
data on disk per server
4GB JVM-Memory per server, 3GB average in
use
Zookeeper 3.3.5 - 3 servers (one shared with Solr)
haproxy load
balancing
Our Solrcloud is very unstable. About one time a week
some cores go in
recovery state or down state. Many timeouts occur
and we
shards each,
2 servers per shard (every core is on 4
servers)
about 4.5 GB total
data on disk per server
4GB JVM-Memory per server, 3GB average in
use
Zookeeper 3.3.5 - 3 servers (one shared with Solr)
haproxy load
balancing
Our Solrcloud is very unstable. About one time a week
some cores go
is on 4
servers)
about 4.5 GB total
data on disk per server
4GB JVM-Memory per server, 3GB average in
use
Zookeeper 3.3.5 - 3 servers (one shared with Solr)
haproxy load
balancing
Our Solrcloud is very unstable. About one time a week
some cores go in
recovery state or down state. Many
is very unstable. About one time a week some cores go in
recovery state or down state. Many timeouts occur and we have to restart
servers to get them back to work. The failover doesn't work in many
cases, because one server has the core in down state, the other in
recovering state. Other cores work
3.3.5 - 3 servers (one shared with Solr)
haproxy load balancing
Our Solrcloud is very unstable. About one time a week some cores go in
recovery state or down state. Many timeouts occur and we have to restart
servers to get them back to work. The failover doesn't work in many
cases, because
cores, 2 shards each, 2 servers per shard (every core is on 4
servers)
about 4.5 GB total data on disk per server
4GB JVM-Memory per server, 3GB average in use
Zookeeper 3.3.5 - 3 servers (one shared with Solr)
haproxy load balancing
Our Solrcloud is very unstable. About one time a week some cores go
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-unstable-tp4100419p4100432.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi-
Unit tests to the rescue! The current unit test system in the 4.x branch
catches code sequence problems.
[junit4] Throwable #1: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
TokenStream contract violation: reset()/close() call missing, reset()
called multiple times, or subclass does not call
HI,
I am working on OpenNLP integration with SOLR. I have successfully applied
the patch (LUCENE-2899-x.patch) to latest SOLR source code (branch_4x).
I have designed OpenNLP analyzer and index data to it. Analyzer declaration
in schema.xml is as
fieldType name=nlp_type
22 matches
Mail list logo
