On 4/19/14, 6:51 AM, Ken Krugler kkrugler_li...@transpac.com wrote:
The code I see seems to be using an FSDirectory, or is there another
layer of wrapping going on here?
return new NRTCachingDirectory(FSDirectory.open(new File(path)),
maxMergeSizeMB, maxCachedMB);
I was also curious
Hi Ken,
Given the comments which seemed to describe using NRT for the opposite of
our use case, I just set our Solr 4 to use the solr.MMapDirectoryFactory.
Didn't bother to test whether NRT would be better for our use case, mostly
because it didn't sound like there was an advantage and I've
On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:16am, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 7/10/2013 9:59 AM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
The Javadoc for NRTCachingDirectoy (
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_1/core/org/apache/lucene/store/NRTCachingDirectory.html?is-external=true)
says:
This class is likely only
Hello all,
The default directory implementation in Solr 4 is the NRTCachingDirectory
(in the example solrconfig.xml file , see below).
The Javadoc for NRTCachingDirectoy (
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_1/core/org/apache/lucene/store/NRTCachingDirectory.html?is-external=true)
says:
This
On 7/10/2013 9:59 AM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
The Javadoc for NRTCachingDirectoy (
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_1/core/org/apache/lucene/store/NRTCachingDirectory.html?is-external=true)
says:
This class is likely only useful in a near real-time context, where
indexing rate is lowish but
