, December 08, 2012 7:36 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which fields matched?
We've used lucene-1999 with some success in ActiveMath to find the language
that was matched.
paul
Le 8 déc. 2012 à 10:09, Mikhail Khludnev a écrit :
Jeff,
explain() algorithm is definitely too slow
: Which fields matched?
The debugQuery explain is simply a text display of what Lucene has
already calculated. As such, you could do a custom search component that
gets the non-text Lucene Explanation object for the query and then
traverse it to get your matched field list without all the text
.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which fields matched?
The debugQuery explain is simply a text display of what Lucene has
already calculated
If I have an arbitrarily complex query that uses ORs, something like:
q=(simple_fieldtype:foo OR complex_fieldtype:foo) AND
(another_simple_fieldtype:bar OR another_complex_fieldtype:bar)
I want to know which fields actually contributed to the match for each document
returned. Something like:
be
required, but the Explanation structure could get messy.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Wartes
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 11:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Which fields matched?
If I have an arbitrarily complex query that uses ORs, something like:
q
[mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which fields matched?
The debugQuery explain is simply a text display of what Lucene has already
calculated. As such, you could do a custom search component that gets the
non
Paul,
I would think debugQuery would make it slower too, wouldn't it? Where is the
thread you are referring to? Is there a lucene jira ticket for this?
On Mar 11, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Russel,
there's been a thread on that in the lucene world... it's not really perfect
Russel,
there's been a thread on that in the lucene world... it's not really perfect
yet.
The suggestion to debugQuery gives only, to my experience, the explain monster
which is good for developers (only).
paul
Le 11 mars 2012 à 08:40, William Bell a écrit :
debugQuery tells you.
On
debugQuery tells you.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Russell Black rbl...@fold3.com wrote:
When searching across multiple fields, is there a way to identify which
field(s) resulted in a match without using highlighting or stored fields?
--
Bill Bell
billnb...@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076
When searching across multiple fields, is there a way to identify which
field(s) resulted in a match without using highlighting or stored fields?
10 matches
Mail list logo