Re: Error in faceted browsing

Outstanding, thanks. - j On 9/13/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/13/06, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the heads up on the merchant_name. I would probably just keep a > dictionary in memory, but if I wanted to pull the stored merchant_name back, > how

Re: Error in faceted browsing

On 9/13/06, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the heads up on the merchant_name. I would probably just keep a dictionary in memory, but if I wanted to pull the stored merchant_name back, how would/can I do that? If you don't want merchant_name tokenized at all, just change t

Re: Error in faceted browsing

Thanks Chris. I bumped the facet.limit to 10 and it works like a charm. Thanks for the heads up on the merchant_name. I would probably just keep a dictionary in memory, but if I wanted to pull the stored merchant_name back, how would/can I do that? thanks, j On 9/13/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAI

Re: Error in faceted browsing

: I just pulled down the nightly solr build from 9/12 and have it up and : running. I copied an index created in a solr version that's about 3 months : old. it looks like my changes to have a sensible default (which is when facet.limit=-1 became legal) didn't make it into solr-2006-09-12.zip, bu

Error in faceted browsing

I just pulled down the nightly solr build from 9/12 and have it up and running. I copied an index created in a solr version that's about 3 months old. I have a query formulated like this: http://solrbox:8080/solr/select?q=description:dell&rows=0&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.field=merchant_nam

Re: Faceted browsing: status

:Simple faceted browsing (grouping) support in the standard query :handler : group by field (provide counts for each distinct value in that : field) : group by (query1, query2, query3, query4, query5) : How far/close is this task to completion? (I'm trying to

Faceted browsing: status

From the Tasklist wiki: - Simple faceted browsing (grouping) support in the standard query handler - group by field (provide counts for each distinct value in that field) - group by (query1, query2, query3, query4, query5) How far/close is this task to

Re: Simple faceted browsing

e. Erik On Jul 6, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Nick Snels wrote: is anybody currently working on the following item from the tasklist? * Simple faceted browsing (grouping) support in the standard query handler * group by field (provide counts for each distinct value in that field)

Simple faceted browsing

Hi, is anybody currently working on the following item from the tasklist? * Simple faceted browsing (grouping) support in the standard query handler * group by field (provide counts for each distinct value in that field) * group by (query1, query2, query3, query4, query5) I had the

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On Jun 29, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Vish D. wrote: Any update on your progress? Eager to get my hands on on your latest code... :=) It's all in our Subversion repository: Sorry I didn't announce it, but we do have a patacriticism- developm

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

Erik, Any update on your progress? Eager to get my hands on on your latest code... :=) Thanks! On 6/28/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > well, the most obvious solution i can think of would be a patch adding an : > invert() method to DocSet, HashDocSet and BitDocSet. :) :

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

: > well, the most obvious solution i can think of would be a patch adding an : > invert() method to DocSet, HashDocSet and BitDocSet. :) : : Yes, we could add a flip(startIndex, endIndex) or flip(maxDoc) Yeah ... like i suggested before just make maxDoc an intrinsic property that DocSets know w

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On 6/26/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : My next challenge is to re-implement the catch-all facets that I used : to do by unioning all documents in an (Open)BitSet and inverting it. : How can I invert a DocSet (I realize I gat get the bits and do it : that way, but is there a bett

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

: It may not even be necessary to cache this type of lookup since it is : simply a TermEnum through specific fields in the index. Maybe simply : doing the TermEnum in the request handler instead of iterating : through a cache would be just as fast or faster. Any thoughts on that? While commutin

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On Jun 24, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On 6/24/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size, so I'm now at the point where it is necessary for me to start using

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

Erik, Oh good! Keep me (us) updated!! As for committing some code into Solr, and the real world uses, I am sure we can find some generic/abstract rules for faceted browsing -- simplest being, a set of fields/categories defined in schema.xml, which could be used for an optional extented query

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On 6/24/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size, so I'm now at the point where it is necessary for me to start using the LRUCache. Though I have already refactored to

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On Jun 24, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Vish D. wrote: Erik, when do you plan on having your implementation refactored with "good" use of code? This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size, so I'm now at the point whe

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

Thank you Chris and Erik. That makes it a bit clearer, but I might need to sit down and look at the code (nines + DisMax...) a bit closer to see how it all works in Solr. Erik, when do you plan on having your implementation refactored with "good" use of code? Or, in general, when is Solr planning

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

: nature of the data I am working with. I have searched through the mailing : list and seen some posts mentioning BitSets DocSets, etc.., but wasn't clear : on if those are already built into the solr's nightly builds (I don't see : any documentation either on the wiki, or online). Can some please

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

take better advantage of Solr's caching infrastructure - so take it as a (bad) example for now. Erik On Jun 23, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Vish D. wrote: Hi all, I am trying to figure out how I can have some type of faceted browsing working. I am also in need of a way to get a list of uniqu

Faceted Browsing questions

Hi all, I am trying to figure out how I can have some type of faceted browsing working. I am also in need of a way to get a list of unique field values within a query's results set (for filtering, etc...). When I say trying, I mean having it up and running without much coding, b/c of

Re: faceted browsing

: What I'd really like to see is an XML query language so I can toss all : the hackish URL query arguments and really move much of the query plugin : logic out into the query itself instead of in the Java code. : customers. We'll introduce dynamic attribute bucketing. Rather than : produce a l

Re: faceted browsing

Chris Hostetter wrote: : My (our) query plugin uses specialized SolrCache's in lieu of the meta : data records. For each new searcher installed each fields possible : values will be determined and stored in a cache (off the top of my head, Are you determining the field values based on all in

Re: faceted browsing

Hey everybody ... sorry i'm getting into the discussion so late ... i was in a Cloud Forrest in Costa Rica for 8 days -- plenty of Internet Cafe's, but i avoided all of them. First off, i wanted to point out that this discussion came up about a month ago, and a lot of ideas about how to define c

Re: faceted browsing

we have 6 to 8 specialized caches, I believe most of them are dedicated to the faceting. Yonik Seeley wrote: On 3/29/06, Clay Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How could faceted browsing be accomplished without [Chris's] metadata documents? The most basic form: consi

Re: faceted browsing

On 3/30/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I need to investigate the flexibility of the solrconfig.xml - can > custom parameters be set there, such that a custom SolrRequestHandler > could read them? For example, I'd want to list the field names that > are the "facets", such that c

Re: faceted browsing

each facet - more memory efficient and faster intersecting filter representations The part I want in the future is simple faceted browsing without having to write any plugins or Java code.. so we need to come up with a syntax to represent the desired faceting operations, and then implement that sy

Re: faceted browsing

On 3/29/06, Clay Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How could faceted browsing be accomplished without [Chris's] metadata > documents? The most basic form: consider if a field called "category" existed on each document. You could then ask for the counts of the top

Re: faceted browsing

How could faceted browsing be accomplished without [Chris's] metadata documents? --cw On 3/29/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Solr has a lot of support to do faceted browsing, but one must > currently write a custom query handler to implement the faceting >

Re: faceted browsing

Solr has a lot of support to do faceted browsing, but one must currently write a custom query handler to implement the faceting logic. The support includes: - custom query handlers: - the ability to return more data than just a list of documents - a filter cache with autowarming, for fast

faceted browsing

I saw Yonik mentioned faceted browsing as something coming in the future of Solr, but I had thought it was one of the initial features from seeing this announcement ages ago: <http://www.nabble.com/Announcement%3A-Lucene-powering-CNET.com- Product-Category-Listings-t266441.html#a748420>