Hi,
Dear All,
Apologize for lengthy email
SOLR Version: 4
Im a newbie to SOLR and have gone through tutorial but could not get a
solution. The below requirement doesnt seem to be impossible but I
think Im missing the obvious.
In my RDBMS, there is a Qualification table and an Employee
Hi Vijith,
See if this solution solves your problem. There might be other ways this is
the one i have on top of my mind at this hour.
You might be having and ID for each qualification. then have the relation
using dotted notation.
1 = MBA, 2 = LEAD etc.
arr name=grade
str1.A/str
str2.B/str
Hi,
I tried giving the pdt_id from the subentity a specific value and it worked.
Only now every product has the same value.
I tried a different subentity with the construct
subentity.pdt_id='${entity.pdt_id}'
with the same result as above, all products had a songtitle with the same
value.
So
Dear all,
Using facet date/range on a date typed field and on a distributed search
between schema compatible cores, the use of facet.mincount=1 brings a cut down
number of facet values (over 500 facet values expected, 5 facet values
retrieved). I wonder whether facet.mincount is supported on
Hi guys,
I was fighting with boost factor in my edismax request handler :
lst name=appends
str name=defTypeedismax/str
str name=bq(idente:2)^0.1/str
str name=bfrecip(ms(NOW,data),3.16e-11,1,1)/str
/lst
I'm playing with bq( boost query) and bf (boost function).
Is
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
Please consider never running optimize. That should be called force merge.
Thanks. I have been letting the system run for about two days already
without an optimize. I will let it run a week, then merge to see the
Hi,
I have a problem with index time boosting. I created 4 new fields:
field name=alltext type=text_general indexed=true stored=false
multiValued=true omitNorms=false/
field name=title type=text_general indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true boost=5.0 omitNorms=false/
i am kyuseok in Republic of Korea.
nice to meet you.
i am searching about 'solr boost term postion' and struggling with this
isusse.
and i still didn`t solve it.
i am serving video contents search server.
and my client require the contents which match the value at the start of
field shoud be
Hi,
I am using Solr 4.0.0. I have a HTML content as description of a product.
If I index it without any filtering it is giving errors on search.
How can I filter an HTML content.
Pratyul
I've made some steps ahead.
I'm writing a function to this sort of clustered boosting:
str
name=bfproduct(recip(ms(NOW,data),3.16e-11,1,1),exists(query(field:value)))/str
I multiply the boost, for a specific value of some field, the exists
function will return 0 or 1, and this would cancel or use
Hello!
You try to put the HTML into the XML sent to Solr right ? You should
use the proper UTF-8 encoding to do that. For example look at the
utf8-example.xml file from the exampledocs directory that comes with
Solr and you'll see something like this:
field name=featurestag with escaped chars:
I think you will have to write an UpdateProcessor to strip out html tags.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
As per Solr 4.0 you can also use scripting languages like Python, Ruby and
Javascript to write scripts for use as updateprocessors too.
-Mensagem Original-
Hi,
One trick is to index a special token at the beginning of the content and do a
phrase query for your terms and the special token with little or no slop. You
can also use Lucene's SpanFirstQuery but it's not yet exposed in Solr. There's
a patch for trunk exposing the SpanFirstQuery in
Hello!
You don't need a custom update request processor - there is a char
filter dedicated to strip HTML tags from your content and index only
relevant parts of it -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory
However, you first need to properly
Hi,
Can you show us the configuration for your request handler from
solrconfig.xml?
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Oct 26, 2012 8:33 AM, vsl ociepa.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with index time boosting. I created 4 new fields:
field
Sorry, to be more specific I am referring to partial document update,
which I believe is new to Solr 4. Also I am using a URLDataSource and
I cannot use the delta-import feature, nor is it what I am looking
for.
I.E.
DIH - creates:
id: 12345
first: hello
Runs again and pulls in the same doc
I spoke too soon! Wereas three days ago when the index was new 500
records could be written to it in 3 seconds, now that operation is
taking a minute and a half, sometimes longer. I ran optimize() but
that did not help the writes. What can I do to improve the write
performance?
Even opening the
Hi,
this is my request handler from solrconfig.xml:
requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
int name=rows10/int
str name=dftext/str
/lst
/requestHandler
--
View this message in context:
On 26 October 2012 13:14, mroosendaal mroosend...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried giving the pdt_id from the subentity a specific value and it worked.
Only now every product has the same value.
[...]
No offence, but it is difficult to try help you if you provide partial
information, and keep
Here's a great blog explaining one major difference between
3.x and 4.x:
http://www.searchworkings.org/blog/-/blogs/gimme-all-resources-you-have-i-can-use-them!/
In a nutshell, 3.x blocks on segment merges (which can be triggered by commits).
I've heard anecdotal accounts that pushing your
I'm trying to employ the HunspellStemFilterFactory, but have trouble
loading a dictionary.
I downloaded the .dic and .aff file for en_GB, en_US and nl_NL from
the OpenOffice site, but they all give me the same error message.
When I use them AS IS, I get the error message:
Oct 26, 2012 2:39:37
On 26 October 2012 18:45, Billy Newman newman...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, to be more specific I am referring to partial document update,
which I believe is new to Solr 4. Also I am using a URLDataSource and
I cannot use the delta-import feature, nor is it what I am looking
for.
[...]
Haven't
On 10/26/2012 7:16 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I spoke too soon! Wereas three days ago when the index was new 500
records could be written to it in 3 seconds, now that operation is
taking a minute and a half, sometimes longer. I ran optimize() but
that did not help the writes. What can I do to
I am currently using one master with multiple slaves so I do have high
availability for searching now.
My index does fit on a single machine and a single query does not take too
long to execute. But I do want to take advantage of high availability of
indexing and real time replication. So it
None taken:-)
Here's the info
OS: Linux
Java: 1.6
Oracle driver: ojdbc14.jar
*view structure:*
END_FRG_PRODUCTS_VW
pdt_id
pdt_title
stock_availability
pdt_pce_bolprice
gpc_id
offer_type
search_rank
search_title
Where can I get a copy of Luke capable of reading Solr4 indexes? My
lukeall-4.0.0-ALPHA.jar no longer works.
Thx,
Carrie Coy
Yes, I think SolrCloud makes sense with a single shard for exactly
this reason, NRT and multiple replicas. I don't know how you'd get NRT
on multiple machines without it.
But do be aware of: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3971
A collection that is created with numShards=1 turns into a
You should still use some kind of load balancer for searches, unless you
use the CloudSolrServer (SolrJ) which includes the load balancing.
Tomás
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, I think SolrCloud makes sense with a single shard for exactly
On 26 October 2012 20:01, mroosendaal mroosend...@yahoo.com wrote:
None taken:-)
Here's the info
[...]
The DIH configuration, and schema look fine. I have
not used the new caching setup in 4.0 enough to
comment on it.
*what i;ve tried*
* importing only the products -- worked
* importing
I am thinking of using a load balancer for both indexing and querying to
spread both the indexing and querying load across all the machines.
Bill
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote:
You should still use some kind of load balancer for searches,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
Taking all the information I've seen so far, my bet is on either cache
warming or heap/GC trouble as the source of your problem. It's now specific
information gathering time. Can you gather all the following information
If you are going to use SolrJ, CloudSolrServer is even better than a
round-robin load balancer for indexing, because it will send the documents
straight to the shard leader (you save one internal request). If not,
round-robin should be fine.
Tomás
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Bill Au
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Bill Au bill.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently using one master with multiple slaves so I do have high
availability for searching now.
My index does fit on a single machine and a single query does not take too
long to execute. But I do want to take
Thanks for the response. This workaround would be difficult to
implement. Also Im finding it very difficult to understand that SOLR
doesnt provide this feature for searching.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:42 AM, adityab aditya_ba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Vijith,
See if this solution solves your
On 25 October 2012 23:48, v vijith vvij...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
Apologize for lengthy email
SOLR Version: 4
Im a newbie to SOLR and have gone through tutorial but could not get a
solution. The below requirement doesnt seem to be impossible but I
think Im missing the obvious.
The schema content that I have put in is
field name=EMPID type=integer indexed=true stored=true
required=true multiValued=false /
field name=empname type=string indexed=true stored=true /
field name=gradeid type=integer indexed=true stored=true/
field name=gradename type=string
On 10/26/2012 9:41 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On the dashboard of the GUI, it lists all the jvm arguments. Include those.
Click Java Properties and gather the java.runtime.version and
java.specification.vendor information.
After one of the long update times, pause/stop your indexing application.
The exists function returns a boolean - which you can use in an if
function:
if(exists(query(field:value)),recip(ms(NOW,data),3.16e-11,1,1),0)
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#exists
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alessandro Benedetti
Sent: Friday, October
Hi,
Have a look at http://search-lucene.com/?q=extendeddismax. Use qf
param in edismax to assign weights.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:19 AM, vsl
Hi,
No... but you could simply query your index, get all the fields you
need and process them to get what you need.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Torben
Hi-
I am trying to add a setting that will boost results based on
existence in different buckets. Using edismax, I added the bq
parameter:
location:A^5 location:B^3
I want this to put everything in location A above everything in
location B. This mostly works, BUT depending on the number of
How about a boost function, bf or boost?
bf=if(exists(query(location:A)),5,if(exists(query(location:B)),3,0))
Use bf if you want to add to the score, boost if you want to multiply the
score
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012
: How about a boost function, bf or boost?
:
: bf=if(exists(query(location:A)),5,if(exists(query(location:B)),3,0))
Right ... assuming you only want to ignore tf/idf on these fields in this
specifc context, function queries are the way to go -- otherwise you could
just use a per-field
: I can't find a good way to create a new Collection with SolrJ.
: I need to create my Collections dynamically and at the moment the only way I
: see is to call the CollectionAdmin with a HTTP Call directly to any of my
: SolrServers.
:
: I don't like this because I think its a better way only
Which database rows cause the problem? The bug report talks about fields with
an empty string. Do your rows have empty string values?
- Original Message -
| From: Dominik Siebel m...@dsiebel.de
| To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
| Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 3:15:29 AM
| Subject: Re:
thanks!
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: How about a boost function, bf or boost?
:
: bf=if(exists(query(location:A)),5,if(exists(query(location:B)),3,0))
Right ... assuming you only want to ignore tf/idf on these fields in this
specifc
: I have a problem with index time boosting. I created 4 new fields:
I think you are missunderstanding the meaning of index time boosting vs
query time boosting.
First of all, this is not meaninful syntax in your schema.xml...
: field name=title type=text_general indexed=true
Ah, there's the problem- what is a fast way to fetch all fields in a
collection, including dynamic fields?
- Original Message -
| From: Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
| To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
| Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 3:05:04 PM
| Subject: Re: Get metadata
Hi there
We are currently working on having Solr files read from HDFS. We extended
some of the classes so as to avoid modifying the original Solr code and
make it compatible with the future release. So here comes the question, I
found in QueryElevationComponent, there is a piece of code checking
A side point: in fact, the connection between MBA and grade is not lost. The
values in a multi-valued field are stored in order. You can have separate
multi-valued fields with matching entries, and the values will be fetched in
order and you can match them by counting. This is not database-ish,
I'm not sure I understand the real question here. What is the metadata.
I mean, q=xfl=* gives you all the (stored) fields for documents matching
the query.
What else is there?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 9:42 PM
To:
Yes thanks.
But how can I check the status of a collection? The action STATUS not
exist in the CollectionAdmin, only in the CoreAdmin.
At the moment probably the only way to get information about this is
somehow through the ZkStateReader?
Regards,
Markus
On 27.10.2012 06:37, Chris Hostetter
On 27 October 2012 07:55, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
A side point: in fact, the connection between MBA and grade is not lost. The
values in a multi-valued field are stored in order. You can have separate
multi-valued fields with matching entries, and the values will be fetched in
On 27 October 2012 01:20, v vijith vvij...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
The dataconfig file is
document
entity name=employee query=select * from employee
entity name=qualification query=select * from
qualification where empid='${employee.EMPID}'/
/entity
/document
54 matches
Mail list logo
