There are quite a number of reasons you may be seeing this, all having
to do with trying to put too much stuff in too little hardware.
Yes, an increasing number of collections will spin up an increasing
number of threads. Also your Jetty container has a limited thread pool
may be a factor. Or you
On 3/10/2018 9:44 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
There are quite a number of reasons you may be seeing this, all having
to do with trying to put too much stuff in too little hardware.
At any rate, there's no a-priori limit to the number of
collections/replicas/whatever that Solr can deal with, the
I have manually unsubscribed many times. But I still get emails from the
list. Can some admin please unsubscribe me?
On Mar 9, 2018 9:52 PM, "苗海泉" wrote:
> hello,We found a problem. In solr 6.0, the indexing speed of solr is
> influenced by the number of solr collections. The speed is normal b
Since Google onsite search will be end of life April 1 2018, I'm trying to
setup my own onsite search engine that indexes my site's content and makes
it searchable.
My data config successfully loads data from my database (products,
companies, blogs) into the fields.
I then try to search in both t
You're mixing two different parsers I think.
If you're using edismax (either specify defType=edismax on your query
or set it up as the default for, say, the "/select" handler in
solrcofnig.xml). The "qf" parameter only is relevant if you _are_
using edismax. If you wan to use edismax your query co
Spoonerk:
You say you've tried "many times", but you haven't provided full
header as described in the "problems" link at the link below. You
haven't e-mailed the list owner as suggested in the "problems" link.
You haven't, in short, provided any of the information that's
necessary to actually uns
Wow thanks. Just trying to unsubscribe. Most email lists let u do that
On Mar 10, 2018 2:36 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
> Spoonerk:
>
> You say you've tried "many times", but you haven't provided full
> header as described in the "problems" link at the link below. You
> haven't e-mailed the l
