Hi Markus - thank you for the question.
Could you advise if/that the solrconfig.xml has a element (for
which deprecated warnings would appear separately) or that the solrconfig.xml
has no element?
If either is the case then yes based on the code (SolrIndexConfig.java#L153)
the warnings would
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8734 created for follow-up.
- Original Message -
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
At: Feb 24 2016 22:41:14
Hi Markus - thank you for the question.
Could you advise if/that the solrconfig.xml has a element (for
Hello.
We would like to upgrade from solr 4.8.1 to 4.10.4 and for existing collections
(at least initially) continue to use the 4.8 lucene format rather than the
latest 4.10 format.
Two main reasons for the preference:
(a) no need to worry about a not-yet-upgraded 4.8 replica recovering from an
Hi Tim,
Thanks for reporting this. The (just created)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9775 issue and associated pull
request sound related to this.
Regards,
Christine
- Original Message -
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
At: 03/22/16 14:49:2
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the question.
The existing FieldValueFeature class uses the field value and you would instead
like to map the value to a number that will vary from query to query.
External feature information (efi) can help with the query-to-query variation
but for the mapping we don't (
Hello Joao!
re: your first question, at present there is no direct way to use document hits
in an external SQL database in a feature. Having said that, Solr has a
so-called "ExternalFileField" type and using that in combination e.g. with the
"FieldValueFeature" feature class should work, I thin
Hi everyone,
At my "Learning-to-Rank with Apache Solr and Bees" talk on Friday [1] there was
one question that wasn't properly understood (by me) and so not fully answered
in the room but later in individual conversation the question/answer became
clearer. So here I just wanted to follow-up and
Hi Michael,
Thanks for reporting this here and via SOLR-11386 ticket!
I've just added a note to the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11386
ticket.
Christine
- Original Message -
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
At: 09/20/17 20:07:24
Hi all,
Hi Brian,
I just tried to explore the scenario you describe with the techproducts example
and am able to see what you see:
# step 1: start solr with techproducts example and ltr enabled
# step 2: upload one feature (originalScore) and one model using that feature
# step 3: examine cache stats vi
From a (very) quick look it seems like the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11501 upgrade notes might be
relevant, potentially.
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 12/28/17 15:18:22To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR 7.2 and LTR
Do you have the ltr qparser plugin reg
Hi Vincent,
Would you be comfortable sharing (redacted) details of the exact upload command
you used and (redacted) extracts of the features json file that gave the upload
error?
Two things I have encountered commonly myself:
* uploading features to the model endpoint or model to the feature en
Hello Vincent and Michael,
Thank you for the question and answer here.
I have added an 'Applying changes' section to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Learning+To+Rank and changed
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Managed+Resources to
cross-reference to the reload
Hi Jianxiong,
Thanks for reporting this. I think this is a bug and have filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10421 ticket for fixing it.
Regards,
Christine
- Original Message -
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
At: 03/31/17 23:19:27
Hi,
I
Hello.
The behaviour we observed was that a zookeeper election took about 2s plus 1.5s
for reading the zoo_data snapshot. During this time solr tried to establish
connections to any zookeeper in the ensemble but only succeeded once a leader
was elected *and* that leader was done reading the sna
Sure. https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/SOLR-5577 filed. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), solr-user@lucene.apache.org
At: Dec 23 2013 18:12:50
Interesting stuff! This is expected but not really something I
Thank you for sharing that 7.6 has the same issue.
If anyone is interested in delving into the code to investigate further, I've
added short steps on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13281 as to how
one could potentially make a start on that.
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 03/1
Hello.
Emir mentioned about starting from the feature/concept. If you haven't come
across it yet then the slides and/or recording of Hoss's "Lifecycle of a Solr
Search Request" talk may be of interest - http://home.apache.org/~hossman/ has
links.
Erick mentioned about getting a sense via unit
Hi Krishan,
Could you share what version of Solr you are using?
And I wonder if the observed behaviour could be reproduced e.g. with the
techproducts example, changes not applying after reload [1] sounds like a bug
if so.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Christine
[1]
https://lucene.apache.org/so
Hi Damien,
You mention about JSON term facets, I haven't explored w.r.t. that but we have
observed what you describe for JSON range facets and I've started
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14939 about it.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Christine
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 10/2
Hello Arturas and Munendra!
In the "Currently, JSON facets have support for specifying the number of
threads." sentence, I wonder if perhaps a "does not" got inadvertently omitted
i.e. "Currently, JSON facets does not have support for specifying the number of
threads." was intended?
Let me sha
Hello Kamal Kishore,
Thanks for including the Solr version alongside your question! What you
describe sounds like the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11163 issue
which is fixed in 7.0.0 but not 6.6.2 release. The fix is a simple two line
change to MinMaxNormalizer and perhaps one wor
Hi Richard,
Sorry to hear you're experiencing log-in difficulties. I've opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19280 for this, hopefully it can be
read without logging in.
Regards,
Christine
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 10/15/19 16:31:36To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
he lines in the github. Your
answer is very helpful.
Cheers,
Arturas
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:08 PM Munendra S N
wrote:
> Thank you Christine.
> Yeah, JSON facet does not support specifying threads.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 11:15 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON
Hello Florin Babes,
Thanks for this detailed report! I agree you experiencing
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException during SolrFeature computation sounds like a
bug, would you like to open a SOLR JIRA issue for it?
Here's some investigative ideas I would have, in no particular order:
Reproducibility:
24 matches
Mail list logo