but we'll manage.
>
> Thanks again,
> Markus
>
> -Original message-
> > From:David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday 12th April 2018 19:16
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: PreAnalyzed URP and Sc
and analysis-common, it would be helpful,
but we'll manage.
Thanks again,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday 12th April 2018 19:16
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: PreAnalyzed URP and SchemaRequest API
s information. It won't be a problem, but it is
> cumbersome.
>
> Thanks anyway,
> Markus
>
> -Original message-
> > From:David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday 5th April 2018 19:38
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subj
h April 2018 19:38
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: PreAnalyzed URP and SchemaRequest API
>
> Is this really a problem when you could easily enough create a TextField
> and call setTokenStream?
>
> Does your remote client have Solr-core and all its dependencies
Is this really a problem when you could easily enough create a TextField
and call setTokenStream?
Does your remote client have Solr-core and all its dependencies on the
classpath? That's one way to do it... and presumably the direction you
are going because you're asking how to work with
