Hi Chris,
Guessing here but this feature might be introduced in case you have use (have
to use) ‘elevated’ field in your schema for some other purpose. Maybe if field
name was “_elevated_", then it would be redundant.
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Ela
4:44:34 -0700 (MST)
> : From: Chris Hostetter
> : To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> : Subject: Re: "editorialMarkerFieldName"
> :
> :
> : IIUC the "editorialMarkerFieldName" config option is a bit missleading.
> :
> : Configuring that doesn
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11977
: Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:44:34 -0700 (MST)
: From: Chris Hostetter
: To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
: Subject: Re: "editorialMarkerFieldName"
:
:
: IIUC the "editorialMarkerFieldName" config option is a bit
IIUC the "editorialMarkerFieldName" config option is a bit missleading.
Configuring that doesn't automatically add a field w/that name to your
docs to indicate which of them have been elevated -- all it does is
provide an *override* for what name can be used to refer to the
"[elevated]" DocTra
Bumping this question up. Is anyone familiar with how the
'editorialMarkerFieldName' parameter works?
Am I doing something wrong?
-Original Message-
From: Sadiki Latty [mailto:sla...@uottawa.ca]
Sent: February-04-18 11:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: "editorialMarkerFie
