Re: [Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

2016-09-20 Thread Alessandro Benedetti
Perfect Joel, keep me updated ! Cheers On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > Alessandro, I'll be doing some testing with the re-ranker as part of > SOLR-9403 for Solr 6.3. I'll see if I can better understand the issue > you're bringing up during the

Re: [Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

2016-09-19 Thread Joel Bernstein
Alessandro, I'll be doing some testing with the re-ranker as part of SOLR-9403 for Solr 6.3. I'll see if I can better understand the issue you're bringing up during the testing. I'll report back to this thread after I've done some testing. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Sep

Re: [Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

2016-09-16 Thread Alessandro Benedetti
In addition to that, I think the only way to solve this is to rely on the aggregator node to actually re-rank after having aggregated. Cheer On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Let me explain further, > let's assume a simple case when we have

Re: [Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

2016-09-09 Thread Alessandro Benedetti
Let me explain further, let's assume a simple case when we have 2 shards. ReRankDocs =10 , rows=10 . Correct me if I am wrong Joel, What we would like : 1 page : top 10 re-scored 2 page: remaining 10 re-scored >From page 3 the original scored docs. This is what is happening in a single sol

Re: [Rerank Query] Distributed search + pagination

2016-09-09 Thread Joel Bernstein
I'm not understanding where the inconsistency comes into play. The re-ranking occurs on the shards. The aggregator node will be sent some docs that have been re-scored and others that are not. But the sorting should be the same as someone pages through the result set. Joel Bernstein