CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2017-10-24 Thread Jaromir Dolecek
Module Name:src Committed By: jdolecek Date: Tue Oct 24 22:27:43 UTC 2017 Modified Files: src/sys/ufs/ufs [tls-maxphys]: ufs_vfsops.c Log Message: remove rebase merge artifacts To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.51.2.3 -r1.51.2.4

CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2017-10-24 Thread Jaromir Dolecek
Module Name:src Committed By: jdolecek Date: Tue Oct 24 22:27:43 UTC 2017 Modified Files: src/sys/ufs/ufs [tls-maxphys]: ufs_vfsops.c Log Message: remove rebase merge artifacts To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.51.2.3 -r1.51.2.4

Re: CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-19 Thread Christoph Badura
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:39:55AM +, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: What I'm more worried about is that it may _never_ be a good idea, in the general case, to put 1M transfers on the bus, particularly single writes, since they may delay things like log transactions in the disk's write cache.

Re: CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-17 Thread Manuel Bouyer
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:39:55AM +, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: I wonder if we could reuse bits from the read-ahead code for write-behind ? I'm not sure the read-ahead code is working properly. When I read through the

Re: CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-16 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: I wonder if we could reuse bits from the read-ahead code for write-behind ? I'm not sure the read-ahead code is working properly. When I read through the filesystem with cat or dd bs=1024k, on a device (wd on ahcisata) that can do

Re: CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-15 Thread Manuel Bouyer
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 02:33:32PM +, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: tls Date: Sun Oct 14 14:33:32 UTC 2012 Modified Files: src/sys/ufs/ufs [tls-maxphys]: ufs_readwrite.c Log Message: In the FFS writebehind code (ufs_readwrite.c:WRITE()),

CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-14 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
Module Name:src Committed By: tls Date: Sun Oct 14 14:33:32 UTC 2012 Modified Files: src/sys/ufs/ufs [tls-maxphys]: ufs_readwrite.c Log Message: In the FFS writebehind code (ufs_readwrite.c:WRITE()), use division and multiplication instead of shifts, to accomodate devices

CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-14 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
Module Name:src Committed By: tls Date: Sun Oct 14 14:33:32 UTC 2012 Modified Files: src/sys/ufs/ufs [tls-maxphys]: ufs_readwrite.c Log Message: In the FFS writebehind code (ufs_readwrite.c:WRITE()), use division and multiplication instead of shifts, to accomodate devices

CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-09 Thread Manuel Bouyer
Module Name:src Committed By: bouyer Date: Tue Oct 9 21:53:03 UTC 2012 Modified Files: src/sys/ufs/ufs [tls-maxphys]: ufs_bmap.c Log Message: Use mnt_maxphys not MAXPHYS to limit the size of I/O to disk. Now the read-ahead code does issue 512k requests to disk. To

CVS commit: [tls-maxphys] src/sys/ufs/ufs

2012-10-09 Thread Manuel Bouyer
Module Name:src Committed By: bouyer Date: Tue Oct 9 21:53:03 UTC 2012 Modified Files: src/sys/ufs/ufs [tls-maxphys]: ufs_bmap.c Log Message: Use mnt_maxphys not MAXPHYS to limit the size of I/O to disk. Now the read-ahead code does issue 512k requests to disk. To