hi,
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:18 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> have you checked callers and ensure that the change from EACCES to EPERM
>> won't be a problem?
>
> Only ipsec_set_policy() returns EPERM instead of EACCES now, and I
> don't think it should be a problem.
"don't think
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:52:40PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> | lu...@netbsd.org wrote:
> |
> | > Modified Files:
> | > src/sbin/fsck_ffs: fsck_ffs.8
> | >
> | > Log Message:
> | > Use "FFSv2" instead of "UFS2".
> |
> | There was a related comment around PR/38192:
Lubomir Sedlacik writes:
> On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:44:27PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> By that token, it would be of use for NetBSD to port over the
>> encrypted swap features other OSes have (it should be essentially no
>> performance hit), [...]
>
> Perry, you can use cgd(4) with rando
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:44:27PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> By that token, it would be of use for NetBSD to port over the
> encrypted swap features other OSes have (it should be essentially no
> performance hit), [...]
Perry, you can use cgd(4) with random key for swap for years on NetBSD.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 07:51:41AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
>> Document that drm(4) needs agp(4). Bump date.
>> (joerg said so, and compilation fails without.)
>
> I really hate to contradict joerg, but...
>
> I think this is incorrect. You can compile drm with DRM_NO_AGP and it
> will compile
Alistair Crooks writes:
>> What's the threat model this is protecting against? Presumably, if a
>> user can execute the program, and the program can read his keys, the
>> uesr can already read his own keys, so having a core dump doesn't give
>> the user information he didn't already have.
>
> Heh
On Sat, 9 May 2009, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 07:51:41AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
So really should simply document the option DRM_NO_AGP rather than
telling folks to include unnecessary drivers!
Just because it compiles doesn't mean it works properly. For most
driver
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 07:51:41AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> So really should simply document the option DRM_NO_AGP rather than
> telling folks to include unnecessary drivers!
Just because it compiles doesn't mean it works properly. For most
drivers at least, you really need the AGP support for
On Sat, 9 May 2009, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: wiz
Date: Sat May 9 14:45:29 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man4: drm.4
Log Message:
Document that drm(4) needs agp(4). Bump date.
(joerg said so, and compilation fails without.)
I reall
