On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Erik Fair wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 01:56, Christoph Egger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/etc/rc.d: network
Log Message:
Do not flush routes if root file system is nfs mounted.
Fixes boot problem when the nfs server is in a different subnet.
This change should be
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Erik Fair wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 01:56, Christoph Egger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/etc/rc.d: network
Log Message:
Do not flush routes if root file system is nfs mounted.
Fixes boot problem when the nfs server is in a different subnet.
matthew green wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Erik Fair wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 01:56, Christoph Egger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/etc/rc.d: network
Log Message:
Do not flush routes if root file system is nfs mounted.
Fixes boot problem when the nfs
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:26:54PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
matthew green wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Erik Fair wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 01:56, Christoph Egger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/etc/rc.d: network
Log Message:
Do not flush routes if
christoph_eg...@gmx.de wrote:
recent history has shown that patches got discussed after commit
not before.
The history has also shown you put too much botches ;-p
---
Izumi Tsutsui
Reduce diffs a bit between ext2fs_reload() and ffs_reload().
It sounds like ext2fs and ffs can share some code.
Many people say ext2fs is a bad mimic of ufs
and actually both ffs and ext2fs are under sys/ufs/,
though detailed structures (reinvented by Linux guys?)
are somewhat different to
Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Reduce diffs a bit between ext2fs_reload() and ffs_reload().
It sounds like ext2fs and ffs can share some code.
Many people say ext2fs is a bad mimic of ufs
and actually both ffs and ext2fs are under sys/ufs/,
though detailed structures (reinvented by Linux guys?)
are
