On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:42:59PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
Blah, I didn't even want to think about this migrane-inducer now.
Maybe people who have recently worked on vnode reclaiming could instead
be the ones to comment?
It's becoming clear that this is something I'm going to need to
On Sep,Tuesday 22 2009, at 9:42 PM, Antti Kantee wrote:
On Tue Sep 22 2009 at 21:04:14 +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
that's not an issue with the reference count. It's an issue with
vclean()
calling VOP_RECLAIM() even if the refcount is greater than 1, and
vrelel() calling vclean() even if
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:09:00PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
Sorry I haven't read this thread until today. I think that it would be
good to test my vreclaim patched kernel it might help to resolve your
problem. But I don't think it is a solution see above.
Your patch won't help. It only
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:08:14PM +, David Holland wrote:
It's becoming clear that this is something I'm going to need to wade
into. Much as I've been trying to avoid it. :-/
There's a (perfectly natural) tendency to try to fix synchronization
problems by adding states -- extra flags,
