On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 01:15:56 +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: ahoka
Date: Tue Apr 13 01:15:56 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/miscfs/specfs: spec_vnops.c
Log Message:
Autoload modules with any class.
This fixes autoloading of pf, zfs and
On Mon Apr 12 2010 at 19:59:57 +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:58:53 +1000
matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
On Fri Apr 09 2010 at 13:49:12 +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: ahoka
Date: Fri Apr 9 13:49:12 UTC 2010
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 01:02:44 +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: ahoka
Date: Tue Apr 13 01:02:43 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dist/pf/net: pf_ioctl.c
Log Message:
Do not auto unload pf if it's enabled.
Well what happens if you non-auto unload it
On Mon Apr 12 2010 at 14:05:38 +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: ahoka
Date: Mon Apr 12 14:05:38 UTC 2010
Added Files:
src/sys/modules/pf: Makefile bpfilter.h pf.h pflog.h pfsync.h
Log Message:
Add new type kernel module for pf (includes pflog, but
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:47:51AM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 01:15:56 +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: ahoka
Date: Tue Apr 13 01:15:56 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/miscfs/specfs: spec_vnops.c
Log
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:54:23PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 01:02:44 +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: ahoka
Date: Tue Apr 13 01:02:43 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dist/pf/net: pf_ioctl.c
Log
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:27:11PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 12:18:38 +, Andrew Doran wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:47:51AM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 01:15:56 +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: ahoka
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 12:32:38 +, Andrew Doran wrote:
So the kernel of the problem is namespace collisions, correct?
Mostly. Though I still think it's not expected that opening a /dev
node will load e.g. an exec package or secmodel even if that's what some
programmer wants.
Would you
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:40:24PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 12:32:38 +, Andrew Doran wrote:
So the kernel of the problem is namespace collisions, correct?
Mostly. Though I still think it's not expected that opening a /dev
node will load e.g. an exec package or
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 13:25:24 +, Andrew Doran wrote:
So the result of our teeth-pulling so far is:
1. You are concerned about namespace conflicts. I am too.
2. I would be happy to see these managed through documentation and
a straightforward approval process for adding modules.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Antti Kantee po...@cs.hut.fi wrote:
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 13:25:24 +, Andrew Doran wrote:
So the result of our teeth-pulling so far is:
1. You are concerned about namespace conflicts. I am too.
2. I would be happy to see these managed through
On Apr 12, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Antti Kantee wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: pooka
Date: Mon Apr 12 22:15:32 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/conf: files
src/sys/kern: kern_lwp.c
src/sys/sys: lwp.h
Added Files:
src/sys/kern: subr_lwp_specificdata.c
On Tue Apr 13 2010 at 13:26:55 -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Antti Kantee wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: pooka
Date: Mon Apr 12 22:15:32 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/conf: files
src/sys/kern: kern_lwp.c
13 matches
Mail list logo