I was just wondering why this change was made? It seems to be a backwards
step to me?
If we need exact-width interger we should use uintNN_t
but I don't think exact width is required in locale.
As other guys say we can't assume uint8_t == unsigned char implicitly:
On Sunday 06 June 2010 11:15:51 Nick Hudson wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: skrll
Date: Sun Jun 6 10:15:51 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/hp700/hp700: machdep.c
src/sys/arch/hp700/include: cpu.h
bah!
Commit message is
More MULTIPROCESSOR groundwork
On Jun 6, 4:51am, dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh
| If it's more important that the nightly test runs come up clean than
| that it actually check for correct behavior so sh gets fixed, the test
| script should at least
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
If we need exact-width interger we should use uintNN_t
but I don't think exact width is required in locale.
The [u]int_leastN_t types may be useful in this sort of code. For
example, [u]int_least32_t is required to exist, and on a 36-bit machine
it
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:37:57AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Modified Files:
src/etc: rc.subr
Log Message:
fix conditional, from dholland.
That makes a lot more sense :-)
(but now I'm wondering if sh should provide some kind of
WIFEXITED/WEXITSTATUS logic so we don't have to
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:08:57AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| If it's more important that the nightly test runs come up clean than
| that it actually check for correct behavior so sh gets fixed, the test
| script should at least document what the correct behavior is. I have
| done
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:18:09PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Sun Jun 6 18:18:09 UTC 2010
Update of /cvsroot/src/sys/external/intel-public/acpica/dist
In directory ivanova.netbsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11458
Log Message:
Import ACPICA
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:11:05PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:08:57AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| If it's more important that the nightly test runs come up clean than
| that it actually check for correct behavior so sh gets fixed, the test
| script
hi, all
I was just wondering why this change was made? It seems to be a backwards
step to me?
my intension is quite paranoia.
changing uint8_t - unsigned char / int16_t - short is because
_ctype_ / _tolower_tab_ / _toupper_tab_ in ctype.h (now splitted
sys/ctype_bits.h)
declared as unsigned
