Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/acpi

2010-07-30 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: 1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that 2. My laptop is dual core, but ACPI reports 4 cpu nodes. Instead of attaching the unmatched ones, make the match fail. Do we want to attach and do

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/acpi

2010-07-30 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article 20100730072156.ga20...@marx.bitnet, Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote: -=-=-=-=-=- On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: 1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that 2. My laptop is dual core, but ACPI reports 4 cpu nodes.

Re: CVS commit: src

2010-07-30 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
Log Message: Make a first pass at documenting the module(9) subsystem. BTW, I wondered what was the official name of this when I maintained src/doc/CHANGES... - src/sys/modules - options MODULAR - module(9) --- Izumi Tsutsui

Re: CVS commit: src

2010-07-30 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
BTW, I wondered what was the official name of this when I maintained src/doc/CHANGES... - src/sys/modules - options MODULAR - module(9) Since all of the public API routines are named module_xxx() I figured that that was the best name for the subsystem. Hmm, then module(9) seems